A
aileron
Guest
It doesn’t disturb me at all. There are certain aspects of evil that have supernatural elements to them, which I obviously reject. That doesn’t mean that I have to abandon a familiar term altogether.Yes, but you used the term evil. That is why I asked. And I can see that it disturbs you to concede that these terms come from a Christian world view, because it then links your thoughts and actions to that view.
You are making the assumption that humans are unable to learn better ethics over time. You paint a dismal picture of man, likely influenced by the doctrine of total depravity. I believe humankind is capable of learning from its history and improving its ethics as a result.And yet, this still doesn’t answer the question. Because their decision was also based on a moral compass, that which came from God.
Brahmen, Ahura Mazda, or Yahweh? Prove it.So you are ducking the question as to not concede that your moral compass in fact is based on that which indeed comes from God.
Is God not omnipotent? Why did he go to great lengths to forbid mixing certain food products or fibers together, but never teach humans that slavery is wrong? If you claim that he did teach humans, prove that it was Yahweh and not one of the other gods. Second thought, forget that. Why did it take thousands of years? “Don’t like it” and “straw man” are two entirely different things. If you’ve got a good reason, let’s hear it.These other topics are a straw man argument. Slavery is something that pertains to one have power over the other. Domination of the stronger over the weak.