C
Calgar
Guest
The burden of proof is not on me for that.Roman Catholics do not go back to the beginning? The when exactly did the RCC start?
The burden of proof is not on me for that.Roman Catholics do not go back to the beginning? The when exactly did the RCC start?
And how are you a follower of Christ, if you are going in a different direction than Christ and His followers? If you separate yourself from His first followers, the Apostles, then have you not separated yourself from following Christ?So youāre saying you must follow Peter and his āsuccessorsā to be a Christian? And here all this time I thought you just had to follow Christ to be a Christian.![]()
I mean rebelling against Godās anointed one - the person that God has chosen to lead His people.You mean sin?
Moses was anointed by God to be the leader of Israel; Korah knew a better way, and persuaded people to depart from Moses, whom God had chosen to lead the people, because to his way of thinking, Moses was not leading the people correctly.Please be more specific. I donāt see prophecy there.
Actually, it does. Our first Pope is Peter, the Apostle of Jesus Christ, to whom the promise was made, āI give you the keys of the kingdom of God. What thou bindest on earlth is bound in Heaven. What thou loosest on earth is loosed in Heaven.ā (Means that Peterās law is Godās law.)But I really doubt the roman catholics go back to the beginning of Christianity.
What other churches claim that Peter, the Apostle of Jesus, to whom the promises were made, was their founding leader?I mean, I understand that you SAY you do, but so do other churches.
Actually, it is, since you are the one who claims that it started at a later time.The burden of proof is not on me for that.![]()
Several orthodox churches, anglicans/church of England, some lutherans, the E.G.C., the methodists do but they donātWhat other churches claim that Peter, the Apostle of Jesus, to whom the promises were made, was their founding leader?
The Anglicans know that their church got started when King Henry VIII named himself Head of the English Church, in place of the Pope; they donāt claim to go back to St. Peter.Several orthodox churches, anglicans/church of England, some lutherans, the E.G.C., the methodists do but they donāt.
What about the orthodox.The Anglicans know that their church got started when King Henry VIII named himself Head of the English Church, in place of the Pope; they donāt claim to go back to St. Peter.
The Lutherans were started by Martin Luther in 1529. (He wasnāt excommunicated until 1534, but he was still creating an organization that was outside of the authority of the Pope, and he had no permission to do this.) Luther did not claim to be in communion with St. Peter, and in fact he knocked the heads off of the statues of the Apostles at the Vatican, when he attacked it in the late 1540s.
I donāt know what the E. G. C. is.
The Methodists were started by John and Charles Wesley in the 1700s.
Funny that Lutherans claim Apostolic Succession while Luther himself rejected it!What about the orthodox.
Also, the anglicans come from the church of England, but doesnāt the church of England claim succession?
The EGC is gnostic catholics. Donāt know much except they claim to be the church.
I was simply trying to show that other churches claim succession. Not just the roman catholic.Funny that Lutherans claim Apostolic Succession while Luther himself rejected it!
The only Churches that can claim Apostolic Succession are Catholic and Othodox.
The Armenian Apostolic Church may be able to make that claim as well, being that they are a split from the Oriental Orthodox Church!
The Gnostic Catholics like everybody else, Lutherans and Anglican included, who claim Apostolic Succession redefine the terms in order to claim it.
That is why the only recognized valid consecration of the Eucharist is in the Catholic and Orthodox Churches. Every group that has removed themselves from Apostoilic succession, serves juice and crackers or bread and wine, No body, blood, soul, and divinity.
Hereās a tip: if the person who started the religion was not a Bishop (or actually an Apostle, as in the case of the Catholic Church), then they canāt have Apostolic Succession, since only Bishops can have Apostolic Succession.I was simply trying to show that other churches claim succession. Not just the roman catholic.
Respect their choice to worship God as they do.Hello there everyone! I am a new convert and I came into the Church after leaving an INDEPENDENT FUNDAMENTAL BAPTIST CHURCH. I was a part of that church for many years and developed some friendships there that I would like to maintain. I have found this to be very difficult. I tried to attend a Bible study there and even attended a few services, but after becoming Catholic and seeing the beauty of the Mass, I NOW see the many flaws in the teachings and beliefs AND āworshipā in my former church. However, I still want to maintain my relationships with some of my friends from the baptist churchā¦I just donāt know how. Attending services and Bible studies there only made me feel uncomfortable. How can I maintain relationships with non- catholic friends outside of the church building? Thanks in advance for your help and GOD bless!
Christ did some pretty divisive thingsā¦Respect their choice to worship God as they do.
Differences should not lead to contention or arguments in anyway.
What would Christ do if he were here in the flesh?


Sorry to hear about the apparent loss of your friendship. Maybe it will take a little time for her to get used to the idea? Not saying that sheāll ever be comfortable with it, but maybe she needs to be allowed to reflect.UPDATE
When I first asked for help in dealing with my non-catholic friends, I was STILL attending Bible studies and an occasional service at my former baptist church.
After much prayer and a LOT of good advice (THANKS EVERYBODY AT CAF), I told my friend exactly how I felt.
I was gentle.
I was NOT confrontational!
I simply told her how HAPPY I am as a Catholic and that (while I love her and MANY others at the old church) I will NOT be attending any more services or Bible studies.
Things have NOT gone as I had hoped.:crying:
I havenāt heard from her (or anyone else for that matter) since I left.
I know that she THINKS that the FUNDAMENTALISTS are right and that ALL Catholics are bound for HELL but I really thought that our friendship could survive this.
L@@ks like I was WRONG!!
THANKS AGAIN EVERYBODY for the GREAT advice.
Thereās a comfort in knowing that MANY of you out there understand EXACTLY how I feel and what Iām going through.
Angela
Youāre right!Sorry to hear about the apparent loss of your friendship. Maybe it will take a little time for her to get used to the idea? Not saying that sheāll ever be comfortable with it, but maybe she needs to be allowed to reflect.
In my experience, the people (not many) who seemed to abandon me over Catholicism did so with real sadness and confusion, not at all with a āholier-than-thouā attitude (Iām sure youāre already aware of that, since youāve probably had more experience than I have!) She may be feeling that you abandoned her.
Give it time, You never know what can happen. But if its not meant to be, then you just have to move on and always pray for your friend.UPDATE
When I first asked for help in dealing with my non-catholic friends, I was STILL attending Bible studies and an occasional service at my former baptist church.
After much prayer and a LOT of good advice (THANKS EVERYBODY AT CAF), I told my friend exactly how I felt.
I was gentle.
I was NOT confrontational!
I simply told her how HAPPY I am as a Catholic and that (while I love her and MANY others at the old church) I will NOT be attending any more services or Bible studies.
Things have NOT gone as I had hoped.:crying:
I havenāt heard from her (or anyone else for that matter) since I left.
I know that she THINKS that the FUNDAMENTALISTS are right and that ALL Catholics are bound for HELL but I really thought that our friendship could survive this.
L@@ks like I was WRONG!!
THANKS AGAIN EVERYBODY for the GREAT advice.
Thereās a comfort in knowing that MANY of you out there understand EXACTLY how I feel and what Iām going through.
Angela
Letās say one of your devoted friends were to suddenly become an adult actress. This friend then tells you that she beleivies this is how she ought to liveā¦How would you react?Youāre right!
I donāt think she has a āholier-than-thouā attitude.
I think you are probably correct as well in saying that perhaps she feels like I abandoned her.
Still, I miss her friendship.
She and I were friends for many years and spent almost every weekend of those years together.
Some of the other church members that I thought cared so much about me, have stopped speaking to me on FACEBOOK as well.
I just donāt get it!
I didnāt change my feelings towards them when I became Catholic.
Why canāt they do the same?
Just because I no longer hold many of the same beliefs as they do, now we canāt be friends?!
Sigh!
I am so sorry you had to experience that. When one walks away from that kind of cultish fundamentalism it can be jarring to see that side of a person you thought you knew. I was once part of that myself.Well itās been a couple of weeks since I mailed a friendship card to my friend.
I told her that I loved her and that I value our friendship.
I said that I would love to see her or talk to her on the phone sometimeā¦NO REPLY!
I just donāt understand this!
How can we be such good friends when weāre attending the same church but now that we donāt worship together, she wonāt speak with me?!
This isnāt a casual acquaintance, we were friends for YEARS!!
I miss her!
I reached out to her husband on facebook but he hasnāt replied either!
Well. I just thought Iād let you all know whatās been happening.
THANK YOU for your words of encouragement.![]()