K
kristacecilia
Guest
Thank you kage_ar for answering my question. You have explained the difference.
Corki…I figured there were more than was speaking up. So what you are saying is…that since my tubes are tied, and for medical purposes because of possible death, I needed to not have my tubes tied and refrain from sex with my husband up until the point that I was in menopause?? Again, I don’t think that is what 1 Corinthians 7 teaches. Just my 2 cents.
Mommyofrosebuds…keep your head up! You are welcome.
No, what we are saying is that it is allowable for couples to use periodic abstinance (mutually consenting to avoid sex for a time, using prayer to discern when to come back together- just like St. Paul said) to avoid or postpone a pregnancy. In your situation NFP would have been both alloweable and encouraged. If there were a legitimate medical reason for a hysterectomy, that would have been morally licit as well.Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self control
Sterilization is never morally licit. Contraception is never morally licit. St. Paul did not say, “Sure, have sex. Have lots of sex. As much as you want. You don’t have to get pregnant all the time. There are ways of making sure that doesn’t happen. Go right ahead and do that. Whatever makes you happy.”