T
twopekinguys
Guest
I’m thinking there may be some truth to that statement.I wonder how many Mormon men with nagging, shrewish wives will conveniently forget the woman’s new name? A case of ignorance being bliss.![]()
I’m thinking there may be some truth to that statement.I wonder how many Mormon men with nagging, shrewish wives will conveniently forget the woman’s new name? A case of ignorance being bliss.![]()
Interesting about that flowchart - the 3 levels of the Celestial Kingdom don’t really make any sense unless you consider that Joseph Smith and his successors taught that only those who were plurally married could be exalted. Now it suddenly makes sense: the celestial kingdom contains only faithful Mormons, whom we assume would all be endowed and sealed. But the top level (godhood) is only for those who entered into polygamy.
“. . . he that abideth not this law (polygamy) can in no wise enter into my glory, but shall be damned, saith the Lord.” (D & C, 132:27)
“Go ye, therefore, and do the works of Abraham; enter ye into my law [polygamy] and ye shall be saved.” (D & C, 132:32)
'“The only men who become Gods . . . are those who enter into polygamy.” (Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 11, p. 269)
“I bear my solemn testimony that plural marriage is as true as any principle that has been revealed from the heavens. I bear my testimony that it is a necessity, and that the Church of Christ in its fullness never existed without it. Where you have the eternity of marriage you are bound to have plural marriage; bound to and it is one of the marks of the Church of Jesus Christ in its sealing ordinances.” (George Teasdale, Journal of Discourses, vol. 25, p. 21)
'“The Lord has said, that those who reject this principle [polygamy] reject their salvation, they shall be damned, saith the Lord . . . they will finally go down to hell and be damned if they do not repent.” (0rson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, vol. 17, pp. 224-225)
God has bouncers and bodyguards.P.S.: As to the secret handshakes, passwords and secret names: in the endowment we are told we must not forget them as we will need them to pass by the angels that stand as sentinels [at the entrance to the celestial kingdom]. So a Mormon could forget them, but I wouldn’t advise it.
Yeah I’ve seen that as well. The funny thing about polygamy is that people don’t realize that the polygamy revelation is merely inactive, and that it could in theory be practiced again at some point in the future. I wonder what happens to those that lived polygamy in the past and their “family units”, as well as those today that are sealed to two wives.Interesting about that flowchart - the 3 levels of the Celestial Kingdom don’t really make any sense unless you consider that Joseph Smith and his successors taught that only those who were plurally married could be exalted. Now it suddenly makes sense: the celestial kingdom contains only faithful Mormons, whom we assume would all be endowed and sealed. But the top level (godhood) is only for those who entered into polygamy.
From MormonWiki.org:
According to the early LDS prophets, they are the only ones who will be exalted. Of course, according to modern LDS, there will be a lot of plural-marriage sealing done during the millenium. And many current spouses will be torn asunder and re-assigned to more “worthy” partners, all under the direction of the inspired LDS leaders.I wonder what happens to those that lived polygamy in the past and their “family units”, as well as those today that are sealed to two wives.
Yes, Paul, you are absolutely right. The Mormon heaven are a series of ghettos where family members are separated from one another because they did not jump through certain mormon hoops. Yes, Paul, mormon families are broken up both on earth and in heaven. Yes, Paul you are so right. Your hatred and unbias opinion is ´worthy of the trash can. Yes, Paul the christian heaven is much better where families are separated by heaven and hell.The LDS heaven is a series of ghettos, where family members are separated from one another because they did not jump through certain Mormon hoops. “The family-centered church” breaks up families, both on earth and in heaven.
I’ll take the Christian heaven, where I can be with my whole family for eternity, in the presence of the entire Trinity.
Yes, Paul, you are so right. It is amazing just how you figured it all out. I am truely amazed. Unfortunately, the mormons are known for their strong families and moral virtues inside the family. In fact, thanks to the mormons, gay marriage was not instituted in California. But yes, Paul, the mormon church is the most antifamily church in christiandom and in all the world’s religions. Yes, Paul, it is the family busting church even though mormons have less divorce than most christian faiths. But that is okay. It is still a ffamily busting church.Correct, the Mormons have succeeded in breaking up the family - in essence putting asunder that which God has joined together.
A woman cannot take herself through the veil. She must be brought through by her husband, father or some other “priesthood holder”. But not to worry. If her husband is not worthy, she will be taken from him and given to another. Note that it does not say she will be able to choose another, but that she will be * given* to another. Women are still very much property in LDS doctrine and culture.
Not only will the woman be taken from her husband, but all her children and grandchildren will be taken from him as well and assigned to the new man. Congrats to the Mormons - they have broken up yet another family.
I think “the family-centered church” doesn’t really fit, does it? Maybe they should call it “the family-busting church”.
P.S.: As to the secret handshakes, passwords and secret names: in the endowment we are told we must not forget them as we will need them to pass by the angels that stand as sentinels [at the entrance to the celestial kingdom]. So a Mormon could forget them, but I wouldn’t advise it.
I wonder how many Mormon men with nagging, shrewish wives will conveniently forget the woman’s new name? A case of ignorance being bliss.![]()
You don’t believe hell is a real place/condition? I thought it was still a part of Mormon cosmology.Yes, Paul, you are absolutely right. The Mormon heaven are a series of ghettos where family members are separated from one another because they did not jump through certain mormon hoops. Yes, Paul, mormon families are broken up both on earth and in heaven. Yes, Paul you are so right. Your hatred and unbias opinion is ´worthy of the trash can. Yes, Paul the christian heaven is much better where families are separated by heaven and hell.
I do remember being told in catechism when I was a boy that hell was a real place and evil or bad people go there, especially when one dies in mortal sin. Yes, Paul that is much better than the mormon ghetto.
My friend Paul was taking glee with the missionary figure of leaving the church after they served a mission. Of course I am still waiting for a reference but that is okay. Catholics never should show glee in this example since many catholics are leaving their faith. Or as in Ireland, France, and Spain, not attending church very much. And of course, if I were a mean spirited person, I could also show glee and rub it in.Yes, true. My point was that your bringing up converts to Pentecostalism in Latin America was irrelevant, yet its premise made sense, since pretty much all Latin American countries are 70%+ Catholic, so converts to other religions would obviously be mostly Catholic.
This is true. In Catholic theology, God does not send people to Hell, people send themselves to Hell.You don’t believe hell is a real place/condition? I thought it was still a part of Mormon cosmology.
I think the objection to the varying levels of heaven is that people who succeeded in living lives of love, in “doing most of it right,” still get separated. God checks your merit badges and segregates you based on them, not on love. God is a “respecter of persons.”
Whereas hell is chosen by the individual when the individual rejects God and His perfect Love. All who welcome God and choose His love will be joined in heaven, one big happy family.
You are too hilarious. Many people of all religions are leaving their religion (or not going to church) in the Western world. And you don’t have to rub anything in, because you’re doing the same thing that Paul is doing by trying to casually mention many Catholics leaving their faith, and Ireland, France, and SpainMy friend Paul was taking glee with the missionary figure of leaving the church after they served a mission. Of course I am still waiting for a reference but that is okay. Catholics never should show glee in this example since many catholics are leaving their faith. Or as in Ireland, France, and Spain, not attending church very much. And of course, if I were a mean spirited person, I could also show glee and rub it in.
But…I am basically a nice human being.![]()
Not really. Mormons are not separated upon death if they lived a faithful life. But in truth, it is difficult to know just what is happening in the afterlife. Most christian faiths have a heaven and a hell. The faithful go to heaven and the unfaithful go to hell. Now that is a separation. Very few, very few people go to hell or outer darkness in the mormon faith. The very wicked will inherit the telestial kingdom, the lowest degree. And yet, still glorious.You don’t believe hell is a real place/condition? I thought it was still a part of Mormon cosmology.
I think the objection to the varying levels of heaven is that people who succeeded in living lives of love, in “doing most of it right,” still get separated. God checks your merit badges and segregates you based on them, not on love. God is a “respecter of persons.”
Whereas hell is chosen by the individual when the individual rejects God and His perfect Love. All who welcome God and choose His love will be joined in heaven, one big happy family.
Not really. I did not bring it up with glee as Paul did. He brought it up and I responded. Paul claimed that many return missionaries are leaving the faith. He said the figure was 50 percent. I challenged it and asked for a reference. His glee was overwhelming. I then brought to his attention that most penecostal converts in latin america were catholic. And I took no glee even though the catholic faith has lost many members.You are too hilarious. Many people of all religions are leaving their religion (or not going to church) in the Western world. And you don’t have to rub anything in, because you’re doing the same thing that Paul is doing by trying to casually mention many Catholics leaving their faith, and Ireland, France, and Spain. But again, your Latin America example was funny, since it had nothing to do with anything, since you may as well say that most converts to any religion in India are former Hindus.
![]()
Instead of blathering aimlessly about his post, why don’t you explain where he got it wrong?Yes, Paul, you are so right. It is amazing just how you figured it all out. I am truely amazed. Unfortunately, the mormons are known for their strong families and moral virtues inside the family. In fact, thanks to the mormons, gay marriage was not instituted in California. But yes, Paul, the mormon church is the most antifamily church in christiandom and in all the world’s religions. Yes, Paul, it is the family busting church even though mormons have less divorce than most christian faiths. But that is okay. It is still a ffamily busting church.![]()
Correct, the Mormons have succeeded in breaking up the family - in essence putting asunder that which God has joined together.
A woman cannot take herself through the veil. She must be brought through by her husband, father or some other “priesthood holder”. But not to worry. If her husband is not worthy, she will be taken from him and given to another. Note that it does not say she will be able to choose another, but that she will be * given* to another. Women are still very much property in LDS doctrine and culture.
Not only will the woman be taken from her husband, but all her children and grandchildren will be taken from him as well and assigned to the new man. Congrats to the Mormons - they have broken up yet another family.
I think “the family-centered church” doesn’t really fit, does it? Maybe they should call it “the family-busting church”.
P.S.: As to the secret handshakes, passwords and secret names: in the endowment we are told we must not forget them as we will need them to pass by the angels that stand as sentinels [at the entrance to the celestial kingdom]. So a Mormon could forget them, but I wouldn’t advise it.
I wonder how many Mormon men with nagging, shrewish wives will conveniently forget the woman’s new name? A case of ignorance being bliss.![]()
LOL! Where do you get your facts? I was at Church today - and in just our little Church, there were five Baptisms.Catholics never should show glee in this example since many catholics are leaving their faith. Or as in Ireland, France, and Spain, not attending church very much.
Your reading comprehension is Waaaaaay off.Not really. I did not bring it up with glee as Paul did. He brought it up and I responded. Paul claimed that many return missionaries are leaving the faith. He said the figure was 50 percent. I challenged it and asked for a reference. His glee was overwhelming. I then brought to his attention that most penecostal converts in latin america were catholic. And I took no glee even though the catholic faith has lost many members.
And yes, you are right about christianity in the western world but my friend paul did not consider that premise. His premise seemed to be lookie here…this is what happening in the mormon church…yippee!
Again, I’m just noting that your tit-for-tat posting tactic is interesting, like how above you couldn’t help but adding “even though the catholic faith has lost many members”.Not really. I did not bring it up with glee as Paul did. He brought it up and I responded. Paul claimed that many return missionaries are leaving the faith. He said the figure was 50 percent. I challenged it and asked for a reference. His glee was overwhelming. I then brought to his attention that most penecostal converts in latin america were catholic. And I took no glee even though the catholic faith has lost many members.
And yes, you are right about christianity in the western world but my friend paul did not consider that premise. His premise seemed to be lookie here…this is what happening in the mormon church…yippee!