Help with friends who had IVF, left the Church because of it

  • Thread starter Thread starter Southwood
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Southwood

Guest
My wife and I are godparents to two children, siblings, of good friends of ours. They had trouble conceiving, and went the IVF route, then left the Church because of the Church’s stance on IVF. They are great people, genuinely loving, and their kids are now getting to the age where, despite being baptized, are not getting a good faith formation.

The question I have is, how do my wife and I work to invite them back into the Church, for their own benefit and for the benefit of their children (our godchildren), knowing that the first thing they are going to bring up is the Church’s stance on IVF? They can’t comprehend that their kids, whom they love dearly, “should not exist”, according to the Church, and have voiced their inability to understand the Church’s stance now that they have their children.

Many thanks in advance.
 
My wife and I are godparents to two children, siblings, of good friends of ours. They had trouble conceiving, and went the IVF route, then left the Church because of the Church’s stance on IVF. They are great people, genuinely loving, and their kids are now getting to the age where, despite being baptized, are not getting a good faith formation.
They had their children baptized without any intention of attending Mass or raising the children Catholic?
 
What a sad situation. The church isn’t upset because they have children by IVF is she? But because of the hundreds of thousands or more of children who were destroyed in order to make it happen… I don’t understand it all, but I think they use multiple eggs and multiple eggs get fertilized and then the doctors choose the most likely? and destroy the rest??? Who is supposed to speak up for the rest? They are also babies with DNA…

I will pray for you and for them. One of these days they may realize that they have several more children in heaven that they didn’t accept… it’s just so weird when people think they know more than God and circumvent His plan…

Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy name.
Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread and forgive us our trespasses,
As we forgive those who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee.
Blessed art thou among women
And blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.
Holy Mary, Mother of God,
Pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen.
 
What a sad situation. The church isn’t upset because they have children by IVF is she? But because of the hundreds of thousands or more of children who were destroyed in order to make it happen… I don’t understand it all, but I think they use multiple eggs and multiple eggs get fertilized and then the doctors choose the most likely? and destroy the rest??? Who is supposed to speak up for the rest? They are also babies with DNA…

I will pray for you and for them. One of these days they may realize that they have several more children in heaven that they didn’t accept…
not all cycles result in more embryos than can be implanted. A friend of mine just had an IVF cycle where 20 eggs were retrieved, but only 3 successfully fertilized, and they transferred all 3 embryos

And even if a cycle results in more embryos than can be successfully transferred, they don’t have to be surprised- there is always the option to freeze the embryos for a subsequent pregnancy.

So don’t make an assumption that these parents have “several more children in heaven that they didn’t accept”
 
IVF is wrong for the same reasons contraception is wrong. It separates the unitive and procreative dimensions of marital relations. Extra embryos merely adds to its sinfulness.

From the CCC
2377 Techniques involving only the married couple (homologous artificial insemination and fertilization) are perhaps less reprehensible, yet remain morally unacceptable. They dissociate the sexual act from the procreative act. The act which brings the child into existence is no longer an act by which two persons give themselves to one another, but one that “entrusts the life and identity of the embryo into the power of doctors and biologists and establishes the domination of technology over the origin and destiny of the human person. Such a relationship of domination is in itself contrary to the dignity and equality that must be common to parents and children.” “Under the moral aspect procreation is deprived of its proper perfection when it is not willed as the fruit of the conjugal act, that is to say, of the specific act of the spouses’ union . . . . Only respect for the link between the meanings of the conjugal act and respect for the unity of the human being make possible procreation in conformity with the dignity of the person.”
 
IVF is wrong for the same reasons contraception is wrong. It separates the unitive and procreative dimensions of marital relations. Extra embryos merely adds to its sinfulness.

From the CCC
I’m well aware of the church’s standpoint. I was simply clarifying that IVF does not always result in discarded embryos.

OP- to be honest, I can understand your friends position on why they left the church. My parents did not leave the church after their IVF cycles, nor did they ever repent, as they did not believe they had sinned- and both of my parents remained actively involved in their congregation- serving on the pastoral council and hands on in the community outreach ministries.

My husband and I made the decision this past week to step away from the church during our treatment cycles simply because, like your friends, I have no desire to worship with people who think they can dictate how a couple builds their family.
 
I’m well aware of the church’s standpoint. I was simply clarifying that IVF does not always result in discarded embryos.

OP- to be honest, I can understand your friends position on why they left the church. My parents did not leave the church after their IVF cycles, nor did they ever repent, as they did not believe they had sinned- and both of my parents remained actively involved in their congregation- serving on the pastoral council and hands on in the community outreach ministries.

I’ve stepped away from the church simply because, like your friends, I have no desire to worship with people who think they can dictate how a couple builds their family.
So you don’t think religious morals should speak to single women going to artificial insemination or IVF specifically to have a baby while being a single mother? Or adoption of children by homosexual couples? (These issues in particular speak to the rights of a child and the cost to society, and not material costs). Religious morals shouldn’t speak to the love and relationship between married couples? I find this a rather odd to think that religion and specifically God, would not speak on such matters to guide people.
 
I’m well aware of the church’s standpoint. I was simply clarifying that IVF does not always result in discarded embryos.

OP- to be honest, I can understand your friends position on why they left the church. My parents did not leave the church after their IVF cycles, nor did they ever repent, as they did not believe they had sinned- and both of my parents remained actively involved in their congregation- serving on the pastoral council and hands on in the community outreach ministries.

My husband and I made the decision this past week to step away from the church during our treatment cycles simply because, like your friends, I have no desire to worship with people who think they can dictate how a couple builds their family.
:eek:🤷:gopray::signofcross::
 
So you don’t think religious morals should speak to single women going to artificial insemination or IVF specifically to have a baby while being a single mother? Or adoption of children by homosexual couples? (These issues in particular speak to the rights of a child and the cost to society, and not material costs). Religious morals shouldn’t speak to the love and relationship between married couples? I find this a rather odd to think that religion and specifically God, would not speak on such matters to guide people.
Personally, I would much rather see a child adopted and raised by a homosexual couple than to be left to age out of the foster care system with no parents.

As to ART and single women- more power to them. Children are born of much worse circumstance (rape, one night stand, an abusive partner) than to a parent who so desperately wanted to be a mother that she was willing to subject herself to painful testing and medical procedures to being that child into the world.

The reality is that 1 in 8 couples face infertility, and you would be surprised just how many of your fellow congregants have gone through IVF. Until you walk that road, you cannot even begin to comprehend the emotional turmoil that those couples face. Many will stay in the church because they feel they made the right decision. Others will leave for the reasons the OP’s friends left, and for other reasons, like the judgement and scrutiny of people such as yourselves.

I find it interesting that there is so much support for folks going through annulments on this board- last time I checked divorce is not condoned in the bible, and yet I don’t see people harping on those going through the process to suck it up, reconcile, or remain single.

So before you remove the splinter from your brother’s eye, perhaps you should work on removing the log from your own.
 
All: Please do not make this into another thread debating the Church’s stance on IVF. Let’s just all walk away from the downward spiral of this discussion before this thread gets closed like the previous one.

OP: It is tough to advise. I think the best is to pray to the Holy Spirit for guidance to help you find the words when the time comes. It is a very personal and touchy topic. I personally think that while Church might not agree with the way their children came to be, she still loves them and welcomes them.
 
IVF is wrong for the same reasons contraception is wrong. It separates the unitive and procreative dimensions of marital relations. Extra embryos merely adds to its sinfulness.

From the CCC
How is having a child together not both unitive and procreative?
 
I would invite them back to Mass. Tell them the Church is incomplete with out them! 🙂 let God do the rest.
 
Personally, I would much rather see a child adopted and raised by a homosexual couple than to be left to age out of the foster care system with no parents.

As to ART and single women- more power to them. Children are born of much worse circumstance (rape, one night stand, an abusive partner) than to a parent who so desperately wanted to be a mother that she was willing to subject herself to painful testing and medical procedures to being that child into the world.

The reality is that 1 in 8 couples face infertility, and you would be surprised just how many of your fellow congregants have gone through IVF. Until you walk that road, you cannot even begin to comprehend the emotional turmoil that those couples face. Many will stay in the church because they feel they made the right decision. Others will leave for the reasons the OP’s friends left, and for other reasons, like the judgement and scrutiny of people such as yourselves.

I find it interesting that there is so much support for folks going through annulments on this board- last time I checked divorce is not condoned in the bible, and yet I don’t see people harping on those going through the process to suck it up, reconcile, or remain single.

So before you remove the splinter from your brother’s eye, perhaps you should work on removing the log from your own.
Regarding your comparison to divorce, it’s not the same. Divorce is not a mortal sin. Having a relationship or getting married without an annulment is a mortal sin. So people on here will advise for people to receive an annulment so they do NOT commit mortal sin.

I mean no disrespect, but I find it inconsistent to be in favor of gays adopting children vs the children “aging out of the system” AND be in favor of IVF?? There are a ton of children around the world who need parents. But too many people who can’t be parents the natural way don’t want those kids. They would rather go through medical procedures and ignore the Church (if Catholic) than adopt a child.

Saying that we need gays to adopt children so they don’t remain in orphanages but then have heterosexuals use IVF instead of adopting?? To me, it’s kind of like saying that the death penalty is wrong, but abortion is ok.

I also don’t understand leaving the Church because you used IVF? Where would you go? Besides the Orthodox Church, the Protestants do not have the seven sacraments. And most “Old Catholics” and “American Catholics” in North America do not have apostolic succession, therefore no valid Sacraments. Not to mention, Protestants don’t believe in the Real Presence of Christ in the form of the Body and Precious Blood.

True Catholics do not judge others. The Catholic Church is a hospital for sinners. We do not believe that Children born from IVF were not supposed to be here. God sends Children. The method of their birth does not negate their life or make then any less human. But at the same time, the method of their conception may be sinful. Whether it be IVF, pre-martial sex, adultery, failed use of birth control, rape, or other sexual sins; the parent(s) committed a sin.

Sin is sin. The Church cannot and should not say “well since everyone is doing it, it’s ok then.”

I fell away from the Church in college and returned when I was 36. I married a Jewish girl and had premarital sex and lived with her before marriage. I even got married outside the Church without dispensation. People used to say do me “don’t you wish the Church would say its OK to use Birth Control and have premarital sex?” And I would always say “no, I think its important for the Church to keep the bar high for society.” Even if individuals don’t follow all of the Church’s teachings or disagree, we need that moral compass to show us the correct path, even if we take short cuts or joy ride… That compass always show use the correct course to Christ.

If you had IVF, repent and know that God still loves you and loves your Children. Your Children are supposed to be here, that’s why there are here.

Lets also look how IVF is a slippery slope too. If society accepts IVF (and I think society already does) how long until we start having genetic engineering (even mild alterations). Couples will start to chose to have IVFs over the natural way to engineer their child to prevent {insert whatever here}. Even if no embryos or eggs are destroyed, the Church can’t condone IVF due to what it could lead society to.

Finally, remember, as Catholics we hate the sin but love the sinner. Remeber, we are all sinners; we are just trying to help everyone we can get to Heaven.

God Bless

*Oh my Jesus, forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell; lead all souls to Heaven; especially those in most need of Your Mercy.

Amen*
 
My wife and I are godparents to two children, siblings, of good friends of ours. They had trouble conceiving, and went the IVF route, then left the Church because of the Church’s stance on IVF. They are great people, genuinely loving, and their kids are now getting to the age where, despite being baptized, are not getting a good faith formation.

The question I have is, how do my wife and I work to invite them back into the Church, for their own benefit and for the benefit of their children (our godchildren), knowing that the first thing they are going to bring up is the Church’s stance on IVF? They can’t comprehend that their kids, whom they love dearly, “should not exist”, according to the Church, and have voiced their inability to understand the Church’s stance now that they have their children.

Many thanks in advance.
Wow. You are in a tough position!
From my experience, people often times read into situations things that are not there. For instance, the Church would NEVER say any child should not exist. Good Heavens! The Catholic Church actually teaches that lots more children SHOULD exists (and not be aborted). But I guess I can understand that your friends feel judged. How sad. From those I know who have used IVF, they feel judged too because something inside of them knows it isn’t quite right . . some knew it was sinful, some just felt it wasn’t “right” but couldn’t explain it - so afterwards, it’s guilt I suppose that comes to the surface that lets them feel judged even when no one is judging.

One way that might help is to re-catechize your friends. There are honestly people out there who went thru 12 years of Catholic school who have no clue what the Church actually teaches. Start with reassuring them of Jesus’ and the Church’s unconditional love and then maybe move into explaining out Catholic morality that is based on life and the dignity of the human person. It would also be good to remind them that since they chose you as Godparents, you have an obligation to help them bring the kids up in the Faith and you don’t want to let them, the kids or God down on your promise. Ask if you can take the kids to Mass with you next Sunday and invite the parents to come too . . .but take the kids even if the parents don’t want to come. It would be a great start!

Good luck. I’ll add you all to my prayer list.
 
not all cycles result in more embryos than can be implanted. A friend of mine just had an IVF cycle where 20 eggs were retrieved, but only 3 successfully fertilized, and they transferred all 3 embryos

And even if a cycle results in more embryos than can be successfully transferred, they don’t have to be surprised- there is always the option to freeze the embryos for a subsequent pregnancy.

So don’t make an assumption that these parents have “several more children in heaven that they didn’t accept”
What happened to the other 17 eggs? They were essentially killed, correct? Will your friend carry all 3 children to term? What if 6 eggs were fertilized? Would your friends have been willing to become the next “John and Kate plus 8”? If your friend would have been ok having 3 or 6 children; would they have been willing to have 15, if 15 were fertilized? And if she decided to abort some, how would she chose?

How many fertilized eggs are aborted each year from IVF?

I’ve watched enough science fiction in my day to tell you that science often follows science fiction. IVF is just the first step, genetic engineering is next, then cloning …

I know that infertility is an emotional subject and I’m sure that many who do it will be great parents. They really want a child badly, which is why they are doing it. So why not adopt a child who needs a home?

God Bless
 
Wow. You are in a tough position!
From my experience, people often times read into situations things that are not there. For instance, the Church would NEVER say any child should not exist. Good Heavens! The Catholic Church actually teaches that lots more children SHOULD exists (and not be aborted). But I guess I can understand that your friends feel judged. How sad. From those I know who have used IVF, they feel judged too because something inside of them knows it isn’t quite right . . some knew it was sinful, some just felt it wasn’t “right” but couldn’t explain it - so afterwards, it’s guilt I suppose that comes to the surface that lets them feel judged even when no one is judging.

One way that might help is to re-catechize your friends. There are honestly people out there who went thru 12 years of Catholic school who have no clue what the Church actually teaches. Start with reassuring them of Jesus’ and the Church’s unconditional love and then maybe move into explaining out Catholic morality that is based on life and the dignity of the human person. It would also be good to remind them that since they chose you as Godparents, you have an obligation to help them bring the kids up in the Faith and you don’t want to let them, the kids or God down on your promise. Ask if you can take the kids to Mass with you next Sunday and invite the parents to come too . . .but take the kids even if the parents don’t want to come. It would be a great start!

Good luck. I’ll add you all to my prayer list.
Great post! Must better than mine! 👍
 
UnCatholicBride;11688837 said:
I can sympathize with the desire to have children. But please don’t say that the Church dictates how a couple builds their family. That is not fair. It is the Church’s purpose to show us what is sinful behavior and what is holy behavior so that we might come to know, love, and serve God as God desires us to do.

If the Church is wrong on the teaching that IVF is an intrinsic evil then you can’t trust any Church teaching and have no way of knowing how to do the will of God. The hardest thing we can do in this life is trust God. To be obedient to the teachings of the Church is to trust God.
 
I would recommend NaPro technology to anyone trying to get pregnant. Also, the charting aspect of NFP can help a woman discover fertility issues that might otherwise go unnoticed. Once those issues are treated, conception in the natural way becomes possible. IVF is not condoned by the Church, and there have been great advances in helping women achieve pregnancy without falling into sin. Why put one’s soul in jeopardy? Wanting but not having children can be very painful, but there are other kinds of parenthood, even for those who are completely barren: spiritual parenthood and adoption.

Just because there are worse ways to bring a child into the world (i.e. it’s not rape or incest) doesn’t mean it’s moral. Also, just because something is legal or is covered by one’s health insurance plan doesn’t make it moral. I read posts from people who used certain “reproductive services” simply because they were covered under their insurance. :eek:

I do think that married Christian couples should adopt more, but things aren’t quite so simple. There is a long waiting list to adopt infants, even those born with disabilities. And a lot of older kids are not able to be adopted because their biological parents will not give up their parental rights. It seems some people like to be able to say they have children but have no interest in taking care of them or letting others raise them. 😦 And of course a lot of people aren’t interested in foster care if they cannot adopt because they don’t want to bond with the child(ren) only to have them taken away. And then you get those who are just in it for the monthly paycheck, which isn’t good either. Money is necessary but it shouldn’t be the focus; the kids should be. And of course adoption is very expensive. A family that could afford to feed another mouth each month might not be able to pay the high adoption fees. The government really needs to work toward making adoption easier.

Anyone who has sinned can repent and come back into the Church. A lot of people “shouldn’t have been born” but God is an expert lemonade maker, making something good out of a bad situation. People born to unwed mothers, IVF, sperm/egg donation, all the way up to rape and incest, we are all loved by God no matter how we got here. A child should not be punished (banned from Church) because of the sins of his/her parents. And the parents can repent of their sins and come back. God loves them, too. People should not be away from Church because they are ashamed of their sins. It takes great humility to go to Confession and to admit to one’s sin. And even if we do not understand why some things are sins (maybe we don’t think we did anything wrong, especially in our mixed-up culture today where a lot of wrongs are considered good or normal), we are still called to obey.
 
I would recommend NaPro technology to anyone trying to get pregnant. Also, the charting aspect of NFP can help a woman discover fertility issues that might otherwise go unnoticed. Once those issues are treated, conception in the natural way becomes possible. IVF is not condoned by the Church, and there have been great advances in helping women achieve pregnancy without falling into sin. Why put one’s soul in jeopardy? Wanting but not having children can be very painful, but there are other kinds of parenthood, even for those who are completely barren: spiritual parenthood and adoption.
It might interest you to know that NaPro Technology can’t fix every fertility problem. I know most instructors teach it as a cure all, but it isn’t .

Now, I am not saying that because NaPro may not be able to treat every problem that someone should dash out and investigate IVF.

Just that there are problems that simply mean that a couple cannot produce their own children.
 
Infertility has certainly become a huge problem in the last decade or so and researchers are now linking SOME cases of it with prior use of birth control pills. Please, before any nasty comments are made, I wrote SOME CASES of infertility, not ALL.

But I’m not sure why younger women haven’t been told about this link? There seems to be a misconception that women can “control” fertility as if it were a problem to be solved . . .take pills to stop it and then stop pills to resume fertility. But it doesn’t always work that way. Children are not a right and they are not guaranteed to every couple.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top