Here we go again...Satanist jihad

[spn82756]

Just wait through the commercial

news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/18499474

 

[qwerk]

Should we wait for the peaceful ones to be outraged? Or to jump on non-Muslim forums and tell us we are misunderstanding Islam?

Everyone should check out the definition of Jihad in Sharia laws, o.9.

I won’t quote the whole thing, but here is the beginning of it:

Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.
``We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.’’

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- ``Fighting is prescribed for you’’ (Koran 2:216);

-2- ``Slay them wherever you find them’’ (Koran 4:89);

-3- ``Fight the idolators utterly’’ (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

``I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah’’;

``To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.’'Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.) …]

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29)

09.1 He who has provided the equipment for a soldier in Jihad has himself performed jihad, Those believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their property and lives.

o9.3 Jihad is obligatory upon everyone (I paraphrase).

There are quite a bit of other things in o.9 that are pretty distasteful if one is a non-Muslim such as slavery, killing old people, etc. If we accept the ‘call to Islam’, or accept their protection (what a laugh - that is accepting subjugation which is like a slave class) then they don’t have to war against us.

 

[qwerk]

I wonder how long this thread will stay up. I suspect that it will be taken down because people are afraid of the knowledge of what is in Sharia laws and the Koran.

 

[spn82756]

I wonder how long this thread will stay up. I suspect that it will be taken down because people are afraid of the knowledge of what is in Sharia laws and the Koran.

People should be scrambling to learn what islam is all about. Lest they become its victim.

I’m still waiting to hear from the muslim scholars…imams and other muslim clerics to condemn this video. They won’t though. They fully support it. Just by their silence. Now…if the pope or any other Christian leader where to encourage Christians to indiscriminately kill muslims…these so called muslim leaders would be screaming islamophobia and hatred of muslims. Isn’t it amazing the grip Satan has on those in his religion?

 

[qwerk]

People should be scrambling to learn what islam is all about. Lest they become its victim.

I’m still waiting to hear from the muslim scholars…imams and other muslim clerics to condemn this video. They won’t though. They fully support it. Just by their silence. Now…if the pope or any other Christian leader where to encourage Christians to indiscriminately kill muslims…these so called muslim leaders would be screaming islamophobia and hatred of muslims. Isn’t it amazing the grip Satan has on those in his religion?

The problem with that sort of thing that I find is that they only tell us what we want to hear. They don’t do one darn thing to stop Al Qaeda. Look at Pakistan. They have taken our money and do nothing and maybe give us one or two guys way down on the ladder of leadership. Last year sometime they told us they were not going to do anymore to help us after they got a bigger chunk of our money.

Musharraf told us that he took most of our money in his Jihad against India.

We not only do not give them any consequences for this sort of thing, our politicians just dump more money into their laps.

Bush caught a lot of zakat going to the terrorists and stopped the flow and I suppose it just went ‘under the table’ but still flowed. Obama put an end to all the problems and let it flow again. If we look at Sharia laws regarding zakat, some of it is required to go to the violence. Here is a recent article on Saudi funding. And don’t forget the oil money we just hand over to them and our politicians don’t have any problem doing since they haven’t let us drill offshore (but let the Russians and Chinese do). I trust their word to stop terror funding like they stopped slavery NOT!!!

Here we see Saudi Arabia openly having telethons to raise funds for the terrorists. We would be kidding ourselves if we think this has stopped since there has been an increase in mosques and their stocking them with hate literature that they have found in way too many of them.

 

[qwerk]

What no one realizes and it is not acknowledged because if it were there would be an alarm raised in all of our countries is the fact that Jihad is as much religious as it is political. It is all through their Koran and somewhat in the hadith. Sharia laws has extensive details about it too.

They are currently demanding that some of our Universities in California be antisemitic. This is totally illegal for our University system here to do that.

here is a little blurb on why a group standing up against this:

UC Berkeley’s Student Senate passed a divestment resolution targeting Israel in a 16 to 4 vote at 3 AM this morning, March 18th. The resolution calls for the University to divest funds from GE and ITT because of their ties with Israel. Professor Alan Dershowitz immediately issued a statement denouncing the resolution.

“Divesting from Israel is immoral, bigoted and if done by a state university illegal. It encourages terrorism and discourages peace. Any university that would actually divest from Israel will be subjected to countermeasures–financial, legal,academic and political. We will fight back against this selective bigotry that hurts the good name of the University of California. This misuse of the university’s name does not represent the views of students, faculty, alumni and other constituents of the greater Berkeley community. Instead it represents the hijacking of the university for improper ideological purposes. It must be rejected immediately and categorically.”

This bigoted and hypocritical anti-Israel divestment resolution that UC Berkeley’s Student Senate passed last night in a 16 to 4 vote.

Singling out Israel for condemnation in the 100-year- old Arab-Israeli conflict is immoral and racist, and “anti-Semitic,” according to New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman.

It is also illegal if done by a state university, according to Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz.

StandWithUs is shocked that the 16 Senators based their decision on the widely discredited UN Goldstone Report. Liberal democracies condemned the Report for bias, misinformation, and distortion of facts, law, and legal reasoning.

The divestment bill claims to be a response to Israel’s alleged war crimes in Gaza, but anti-Israel activists have unsuccessfully called for divestment from Israel since 2002, years before the Gaza war began. The Student Senate unfortunately was hijacked and capitulated to this bigoted campaign. As Professor Dershowitz points out, it “does not represent the views of the greater university community” which has consistently rejected divestment efforts.

If the Berkeley Student Senators really opposed war crimes, they would condemn the ongoing killing in Darfur, the Congo, Iran, Nigeria, and other countries where human rights are consistently violated and the murder of innocents is systematic. They would denounce Iran as it violates all international resolutions and races to build nuclear weapons to dominate and terrorize the region and export its Islamist revolution.

If the Senators really wanted to promote Palestinian- Israeli peace, they would denounce the historical record of thousands of Hamas rocket attacks from Gaza against Israeli men, women, and children in southern Israel where children still suffer from severe Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome. They would condemn Abbas’ government for honoring Dalal Mughrabi, the perpetrator of the worst terrorist attack in Israel’s history, by officially naming a public square after her and holding ceremonies in her memory-all just days before this Senate resolution passed. They would condemn Abbas’ government for fomenting riots over the past week because Israel completed restoring its 300-year-old synagogue in Jerusalem which had been destroyed by Jordanian forces in 1948. They would condemn Abbas for refusing to recognize the Jewish State of Israel, and for refusing to return to the negotiating table.

Above all, they would condemn Hamas whose founding document calls for the murder of Jews, the obliteration of Israel and its replacement with a Taliban-like theocracy. They would denounce Hamas’ occupation of Gaza, its oppression of Gaza’s people, and its routine murder of its Palestinian opponents.

If the Senators are interested in peace, they should praise Israel’s multiple peace offers and repeated willingness to compromise. If they oppose human rights violations, they should support Israel, a staunch American ally in the larger battle against terrorism and anti-democratic regimes.

StandWithUs is extremely disturbed that the Berkeley Student Senate focused on condemning democratic Israel yet remains silent or seems to endorse the real crimes against humanity and the real enemies of peace who threaten both the Israeli and Palestinian people. Apparently the Student Senate no longer believes in “speaking truth to power.” Instead, it has capitulated to the bigotry, falsehoods, and racism of anti-Israel campaigns encouraged and supported by oil-rich nations in the Middle East.

 

[qwerk]

The blur between Church and state is very real in Islam. There is no division and that is why we see them increasing their demads for us to do things to accomodate their religous needs in areas where we successfully divided Church and State so everyone can practice their religion at home and no one cares. Criticizing Islam ALWAYS means we offend them which is outrageous since it is an ideology not above criticism just as Chritianity, Judaism, etc. Leave it at home, you can talk about it but don’t shove it in people’s faces at work or in businesses. Now there are demands all the time for schools to accomodate them (they should be told to buy what they need and send it along with their kids if they don’t want to eat what is provided for them in schools since the schools have many religious groups and are also strapped for money). They demand foot baths, segregation, etc. Segregating was gotten rid of years ago and now they bring it back. What if we did that to them?

The real human rights violations are contained in Sharia laws that are followed in Muslim lands. Currently Wales is going to be trying to start putting Sharia laws into its system and people are gathering to counter that idea. It is making the rest of England a mess and now they have ‘no go’ areas in Britain too just as they do in many areas in France and the rest of Europe.