F
FiveLinden
Guest
Yes, he is clearly correct about the Hail Mary unless Angels have a language that allows a word corresponding to ‘us’ that excludes the speaker. I confess that I don’t have strong views on the other points but as you have asked:So are you saying that the priest is correct? What about the other parts of what he was saying?
1 that not everything Paul wrote is true. (I didn’t confront)
I am sure that is the case. In fact, not everything ‘Paul’ wrote was written by Paul, in the opinion of a great many scholars.
2 that the just Angels were not saved by grace (resisted correction)
Well, they must have been saved at the least by grace plus the exercise of free will, as some were not saved.
3 that Mary was sinless from Her Birth (took correction like a saint)
I am sure Catholic teaching upholds this, just as she was female from birth. What happened prior to birth is irrelevant to this statement.
4 that Jesus could have sinned by chose not to (hostilely resisted correction but later on seeing the evidence of the Church’s teaching, humbly assented to the faith).
Hmmm. Given the deity of Jesus, and the omnipotence of God, not sure that this can be established. The same logic would suggest that God cannot be both creator and creature yet in Catholic teaching he managed that!
[/quote]