Hieromonk Ambrose

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hesychios
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And who in this thread is asking that you or anyone else honor him? Other than your unnecessary, mean-spirited posts and the replies to them, all I see are requests for and agreements to pray for a priest of the Orthodox Church who is terminally ill.
 
If by anti-catholicism, you mean being against the administration of the Catholic Church, then pretty much all Orthodox are “anti-catholic”, and most Catholics are rather “anti-orthodox” (look at all of the Moscow bashing that goes on here at CAF)
So you believe that Catholicism is “a vehicle for damnation”? And worthy of hatred?

So does Jack Chick - and his ilk would not be tolerated, let alone honored, here.
 
I fear many don’t know him - and his quote exposes him for what he is. Yes, we need to pray for him. But, he is not what many here say he is. He publicly says Catholicism is a vehicle for damnation - and you want us to pretend he’s all sweetness and light? He needs our prayers as all anti-Catholics do.
But, we don’t need to honor him!
Just who is honouring him ?

Al we are doing is what the Church asks us to do - pray for the sick and suffering .

Lord have mercy
 
So you believe that Catholicism is “a vehicle for damnation”? And worthy of hatred?

So does Jack Chick - and his ilk would not be tolerated, let alone honored, here.
No, I do not believe that the Catholic Church is a vehicle of damnation. I doubt that Fr. Ambrose does either. In context his statement was a reference to how the Catholic Church has changed its teaching about whether failing to abstain from meat on fridays is a mortal sin or not. It was a statement rhetorical in nature, which you are taking out of context.
 
No, I do not believe that the Catholic Church is a vehicle of damnation. I doubt that Fr. Ambrose does either. In context his statement was a reference to how the Catholic Church has changed its teaching about whether failing to abstain from meat on fridays is a mortal sin or not. It was a statement rhetorical in nature, which you are taking out of context.
It’s not rhetorical and it’s completely in context - and consistent with his postings in general.

Let folks look at his post quoted above - it’s clear and consistent. Let anyone who’s interested look at his posts here and otherwise.

You may like him (as does Hes) and his posts (which raises its own issues…), but he is vehemently anti-Catholic - as is obvious now to even the most blind. The attempt to say black is white is beneath you…or, maybe not.
 
If by anti-catholicism, you mean being against the administration of the Catholic Church, then pretty much all Orthodox are “anti-catholic”, and most Catholics are rather “anti-orthodox” (look at all of the Moscow bashing that goes on here at CAF)
The article Never the Twain? was quoted and discussed in the Why do the Orthodox need Catholics? thread. I just mention it here for the sake of anyone who missed it before:
Conservative Roman Catholics, looking sympathetically at the Orthodox, seem to feel that a great deal of the foregoing hopes might be soon fulfilled, perhaps even in our generation. They share Pope John Paul’s grand vision of a Christendom reunited for the third millennium. It is natural, I suppose, that they should imagine that the Orthodox partake of these hopes.
But then something terrible happens. They stumble across the latest Christian Activist, for example, or Epiphany, or Again, or maybe even a diocesan magazine like The Word. They will not read many issues of such journals without running across some severe (and, I am sorry to say, not always just nor invariably accurate) criticisms of either the Roman Catholic Church in general or the Vatican in particular. They are shocked.
Like the recent editorial in This Rock, these conservative Roman Catholics may want to dismiss such negative commentary as atypical, radical, and aberrant. They cannot bring themselves to believe that those nice Eastern Orthodox Christians do not feel so close to Rome as Rome does to them. Surely the Orthodox as a whole are more kindly disposed, they imagine; people like Frank Schaeffer and Father Alexey Young must be fanatics of some sort, not genuinely representative of the Orthodox attitude toward reunion with Rome.
 
As one who has crossed swords (verbally, of course!) with Fr. Ambrose many times, and who is very familiar with his intense dislike (hatred?) of the Catholic Church, I find it somewhat shameful that we should be discussing him here in the manner that has been going on. A very similar situation occurred on the Orthodox board which he formerly played an active role in, when someone started a thread in the prayer request forum for him. It quickly devolved in something less than, shall we say, “charitable”. That thread was locked and a new one opened solely for the purpose of posting prayers for him.

What is at issue here is that someone has requested that we pray for this dying man, who, other things aside, was loved and respected by many. Perhaps this request should have been posted in the prayer forum on this board, rather than on the EC forum. Be that as it may, most especially as we begin Holy Week, can we not set aside any dislike or animosity we may have for him and his positions, offer forgiveness to a dying Christian priest, and just pray for the suffering man?
 
If I refused to pray for those who I disagree with, my prayers would be significantly shorter, consisting only of myself.

As Christ said, even the tax collectors love those who love them, the trick is to love your enemies.

I didn’t know Fr. Ambrose outside of some posts, and I don’t exercise virtue by praying for him, but I ask that posters refrain from vice when they condemn him.
 
If I refused to pray for those who I disagree with, my prayers would be significantly shorter, consisting only of myself.

As Christ said, even the tax collectors love those who love them, the trick is to love your enemies.

I didn’t know Fr. Ambrose outside of some posts, and I don’t exercise virtue by praying for him, but I ask that posters refrain from vice when they condemn him.
I’ve seen no one here refuse to pray for Fr. Ambrose - I certainly haven’t. Indeed I have prayed for him - and continue to do so.

However, if someone came here and asked us all to pray for Jack Chick, I do believe it would be appropriate to point out his virulent anti-Catholic stance - and even highlight it for prayer. That I have done for Fr. Ambrose. That I would do for any anti-Catholic. They need additional prayers.

If Jack Chick’s friends came here, and they were long time posters on this forum, I would feel compelled to identify Jack and note his hatred for Catholicism. I would still pray for Jack - and his friends.

I, for one, feel sorry for a sick man who in his self-posted notes proclaims his hatred for Catholicism and his accusation that Catholicism is a “vehicle of damnation.” Dying in hatred and outside the Church is a terrible thing.

Fr. Ambrose certainly needs our prayers. But, everyone here needs to know what and who he is - perhaps God will touch his heart and bring him back before it is too late.
 
If by anti-catholicism, you mean being against the administration of the Catholic Church, then pretty much all Orthodox are “anti-catholic”, and most Catholics are rather “anti-orthodox” (look at all of the Moscow bashing that goes on here at CAF)
No… I mean saying he “hates” Catholicism and calling it a “vehicle of damnation.” That really takes it a light year past administrative concerns…

That sort of language is consistent with the most hate-filled anti-Catholicism one can find in history.
 
I think this thread may have reached the point where it’s just going around in circles.
 
I don’t think I said that; but I do have my suspicions, in light of your diatribes on this thread.
No diatribe - just an inconvenient truth.

I’m reminded of President Truman’s famous quote: “I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it’s hell.”
 
I’ve seen no one here refuse to pray for Fr. Ambrose - I certainly haven’t. Indeed I have prayed for him - and continue to do so.

However, if someone came here and asked us all to pray for Jack Chick, I do believe it would be appropriate to point out his virulent anti-Catholic stance - and even highlight it for prayer. That I have done for Fr. Ambrose. That I would do for any anti-Catholic. They need additional prayers.

If Jack Chick’s friends came here, and they were long time posters on this forum, I would feel compelled to identify Jack and note his hatred for Catholicism. I would still pray for Jack - and his friends.

I, for one, feel sorry for a sick man who in his self-posted notes proclaims his hatred for Catholicism and his accusation that Catholicism is a “vehicle of damnation.” Dying in hatred and outside the Church is a terrible thing.

Fr. Ambrose certainly needs our prayers. But, everyone here needs to know what and who he is - perhaps God will touch his heart and bring him back before it is too late.
I (think) I understand where you’re coming from, butwhy is it necessary to know anything beyond the reason we have been asked to pray for them about anyone whom we have been asked to pray for?
 
I (think) I understand where you’re coming from, butwhy is it necessary to know anything beyond the reason we have been asked to pray for them about anyone whom we have been asked to pray for?
It is not.
 
I (think) I understand where you’re coming from, butwhy is it necessary to know anything beyond the reason we have been asked to pray for them about anyone whom we have been asked to pray for?
So that we might pray properly for what is needed - especially for one like Fr. Ambrose who is so desperately in need of it.
 
Thank you for the “correction”, johnnykins, but there was nothing incorrect about my statement as I posted it.
 
So that we might pray properly for what is needed - especially for one like Fr. Ambrose who is so desperately in need of it.
God knows what is needed. If we are asked to pray for someone who is sick and dying, God knows how to use whatever we offer up in the most beneficial manner possible–irregardless of how much or how little we know otherwise about those we are offering our prayers for. Surely a name is quite sufficient, and I’m quite sure God even knows that–even if we do not.
 
I (think) I understand where you’re coming from, butwhy is it necessary to know anything beyond the reason we have been asked to pray for them about anyone whom we have been asked to pray for?
I think everyone here should know what sort of man Fr. Ambrose is – at least enough to know that the comparisons between him and Jack Chick are absurd propaganda.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top