High Church, Low Church, Broad Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter JNB
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JNB

Guest
I know some say the Roman Catholic church in the US and in the West for that matter is headed for schism, but I doubt that, but what I do think is the church is headed for liturgical divsions similar to that of the Anglicans/Epsicopalins. First let me give a background of the liturgical divsions among the Anglicans.

High Church- This branch of the Anglicans are also known as Anglo Catholic. Their style of worship almost amounts to the Tridentine mass in English, though most of the priests who celebrate in this manner now face the people.

Low Church- A almost non liturgical style of worship, also called the Evangelical wing of the church.

Broad- Church, sort of in between. Its a liturgical style of worship, though without the smalles and bells, somwhat similar to the current Novus Ordo mass but still uses communion rails.

That said, one ha sto keep in mind that in terms of theology, the divsions in the Anglican church are not all that neat. Many high church conregations are very liberal theologically, while the low church/evengelical wing is the most conservative theologically.

As for how the splits in the Catholic church, here is how I place them.

High Church- Tridentine mass and trad-lite Novus Ordos. In the case of the Novus Ordo, it usually has traditional elements such as use of some Latin, no altar girls, no EMHCs, use of the altar rail. This liturgical group is fairly small, but it produces vocations that far exceeds its small numbers as a percentage of the church as a whole. This group is also almost entirely conservative theologically.

Broad Church- The biggest grouping of the church in the US. The basic suburban parish, with altar girls, a large number of EMHCs, Haugen and Haas hymns and so on. Theologically moderate-conservative, but doesnt take any tough stands, though also it is rare that one would see outright dissent or liturgical dancers at these parishes.

Low Church- This group is all over the place. From Newman centers, to rich suburban and inner city parishes to Charismatic groups. Here one will see oddball liturgical practices such as liturgical dancers, an agressive attempt to de sacramentalize the liturgy, agressive dissent from church teachings, and a big push on social justice or as often called “peace & justice”. This group per capita is probably the most well off in terms of finances, it has many allies in chancery offices, various orders, universities and many of the more senor clergy and even a few bishops are sympathetic to this group, so it has a fair amount of power still. The thing is it is almost in terms of age the oldest of these main groups and produces almost no vocations. Theologically except for the Charismatics, they are liberal.
 
I doubt you will see formal liturgical divisions within the church on this basis.

I would not be surprised, if the majority of the first world Bishops stood strongly for the faith in line with the magisterium, that a small number of Bishops and some clergy split off into a liberal church where “pick and choose” morality was acceptable and more freedom in the liturgies were granted.

Taken to an extreme of liturgy this schismatic church which I will call for discussion purposes (using the term they might use), the Tolerant Catholic Church, would be the drive-through mass.

Picture a small church with a drive through with three windows.

First window, you pick up a cassette tape, CD, or DVD with today’s service on it.

Second window, you make your offering.

Third window, a Eucharistic Minister wearing a uniform, distributes communion and asks if you want a snack with it.

Think I am crazy, if the dissidents break off and do not reunite within a few years, I foresee this sad event coming around.

The Tolerant Catholic Church would be the media darling while the Catholic Church would be even more demonized by the media.
 
In fairness to history one cannot ignore a terce observation cited in the Catholic Encyclopedia:

“What is the nature of the visible Church? Is it a society whose organization with its threefold ministry has been preordained by Jesus Christ, and is therefore essential, or is it one in which this organization, though of Apostolic precedent, can be departed from without forfeiture of church status? The High Churchmen have always stood for the former of these alternatives, the Low Churchmen for the latter.”

This is not essentially a liturgical issue. It manifests in liturgy but does not reside there.
 
These are my thoughts on the issue:

When it comes to praise of Almighty God, why in the world would one want to give God anything less than High? This is one thing that I don’t like about the Roman Rite. I am of an Eastern Rite, and there is no distinction between high and low.

Cocamo Joe
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top