D
DrumminFool91
Guest
So around the dinner table, I heard that Hillary Clinton’s universal health care plan that she tried to enact during her presid… I mean her husband’s presidency included making amniocentesis testing for pregnant women a mandatory feature of the plan. Supposedly, if a woman would refuse the testing, or refused an abortion if the tests came back positive, the healthcare costs for the woman and the child would not be covered by the government.
(*For those who don’t know, amniocentesis is an invasive test in which amniotic fluid is extracted by a long, thin needle in order to determine whether or not an unborn child has a defect like down-syndrome - they are egregiously incorrect and come with a 1% risk of miscarriage).
The other part of this is that this mando-testing is supposed to be included in some form in the current administration’s universal health care plan.
So here’s some questions: how can I verify the veracity of these claims? If these claims are true, what can we do about it?
(*For those who don’t know, amniocentesis is an invasive test in which amniotic fluid is extracted by a long, thin needle in order to determine whether or not an unborn child has a defect like down-syndrome - they are egregiously incorrect and come with a 1% risk of miscarriage).
The other part of this is that this mando-testing is supposed to be included in some form in the current administration’s universal health care plan.
So here’s some questions: how can I verify the veracity of these claims? If these claims are true, what can we do about it?