I do not know how far off the mark this Jesuit ended up in his career, but his initial statement was in my opinion not altogether untrue. Truth is like a multifaceted gem stone, it does not change, but depending on the light, the point of view, etc. it will be in some ways unique to each observer exactly how he will describe it. That is why we have a majesterium, to keep people from regrinding the gemstone and changing its shape and absolute meaning.
Consider for example and auto accident. One event actually took place in specific ways, but observers will each have a slightly different perspective on what happened and when. Similarly with an absolute truth. There are not multiple truths, but how it impacts one life and how one understands it will differ slightly from individual to individual. When asked to state the truth a dozen people may state it in exactly the same words, but when asked to explain what it means and how it impacts their lives you are going to get different statements, hopefully very similar, but rarely exactly the same.
There is also a time element in all these truths as well. The truths and definitions do not change, but society does change. How it is understood and how it impacts lives is going to change with the times. For example principle says we are required to dress modestly, but what is considered modest changes with time. The principle does not change, but the manner in which it is obeyed does.
