History of Fundamentalism in America

  • Thread starter Thread starter kspillane
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Having once been part of this movement I will put my two cents in for you.
The fundamentalist movement began in the early part of the 20th century as a reaction against the growing liberalism in mainline denominations. The early fundamentalist conferences included almost every Protestant denomination.
It included many denominations (including Episcopal) who argued incessantly over WHAT those fundamentals were.* The Presbyterians wished to include Calvinism. Others wished to include a new theology called Dispensationalism, still others argued over the Millennial Reign of Christ. It became so fractured that by the 1960s only Fundamental Baptists accepted the term. Today, only a few Presbyterian denominations refer to themselves as ‘fundamentalists’, most would prefer the term ‘evangelical’.
Fundamentalism exists in the fog of a false history (which is why they discourage educated inquiry) and ‘separation’. They believe they are ‘Bible based’ and all other denominations reject the Bible and salvation.
There are three basic types of fundamentalist baptists:

**1. The Jerry Falwel, Liberty University variety. **
I attended LU and can safely say they are the most reasonable kind (that may shock some people). They would fit into the " ‘New Evangelicals’ Billy Graham, Charles Colson, James Dobson" types. Hard-core fundamentalists do not consider them to be fundamentalists (for a variety of reasons I will not bore you with explaining, not the least of which is that they (GASP) use modern english versions of the Bible.
2. The Bob Jones University variety.

They range from Calvinist to Arminian in theology. They tend to be more intellectual, but very elitist and racist. Their numbers are dwindling however, Two pastors I sat under were from BJU.

**3. The Hyles-Anderson College, KJV-only variety. **
These are the wide-eyed fanatics. These are the haters. Very anti-intellectual, cultic, abrasive, paranoid…I could go on, but you get the picture. The third group I have encountered, even preached in a few of their churches, but I avoided them.
Just wanted to comment on the bolded. I consider myself an evangelical. I came to know Christ in a real way through a Billy Graham crusade several years ago and have been growing stronger in my walk with Christ ever since, through God’s help.

There are a lot of Christians who have benefited greatly in their faith over the years from the teachings of evangelical Christian leaders like Billy Graham, Franklin Graham, Chuck Colson, and from folks like James Dobson, who gives help and practical advice on family dynamics. I am one of them.

Even some Catholics had life-changing conversions at a Billy Graham crusade and became more faithful and productive parishioners as a result of it. I guess I’m not sure what your point is, but I hope it is not trying to paint evangelicals as uneducated second class Christians.
 
There are other groups that would fit into the “fundamentalist” mold. The Restoration movement was part of the “Second Great Awakening” in the late 1700’s early 1800’s. Also known as the Campbell-Stone movement. This grew out of Appalachia, and spread throughout parts of the South and pretty heavily in Texas. You’ll recognize the descendants of that movement as the “Church of Christ” and the “Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)” and all their offshoots. They were the first attempt at “non-denominationalism”. The goal was to have everyone leave denominations and become a part of this movement, which by necessity, focused on the “fundamentals” as they saw them. Both Thomas and Alexander Campbell were educated in Scotland, so there may in fact be a fundamentalist connection to the old world. The Alexanders and Barton Stone left the Presbyterian Church to start this movement.

It’s worth noting that Joseph Smith (yes, THAT Joseph Smith) knew Alexander Campbell. Obviously, they did not agree on things, but I believe you can trace the Mormon restorationist and “Great Apostasy” beliefs back to this movement. In fact, Joseph Smith’s first followers were former followers of Alexander Campbell.

The Wikipedia article about the Restoration Movement is pretty good. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restoration_Movement
The problem is however you are using a modern definition of the word. Historic fundamentalism WAS denominational. It only became ‘non denominational’ after the 1920s Scopes trial.
The origin of ‘fundamentalist’ is found in the ‘five fundamentals’ of Christianity (as they saw it).
  1. The Deity of our Lord Jesus Christ (John 1:1; John 20:28; Hebrews 1:8-9).
  2. The Virgin Birth (Isaiah 7:14; Matthew 1:23; Luke 1:27).
  3. The Blood Atonement (Acts 20:28; Romans 3:25, 5:9; Ephesians 1:7; Hebrews 9:12-14).
  4. The Bodily Resurrection (Luke 24:36-46; 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, 15:14-15).
  5. The inerrancy of the scriptures themselves
 
Just wanted to comment on the bolded. I consider myself an evangelical. I came to know Christ in a real way through a Billy Graham crusade several years ago and have been growing stronger in my walk with Christ ever since, through God’s help.

There are a lot of Christians who have benefited greatly in their faith over the years from the teachings of evangelical Christian leaders like Billy Graham, Franklin Graham, Chuck Colson, and from folks like James Dobson, who gives help and practical advice on family dynamics. I am one of them.

Even some Catholics had life-changing conversions at a Billy Graham crusade and became more faithful and productive parishioners as a result of it. I guess I’m not sure what your point is, but I hope it is not trying to paint evangelicals as uneducated second class Christians.
Simmer down Tommy. 😉
I was just explaining the origins and the differences. The term ‘new evangelical’ is outdated anyway. Part of that post itself is a few years old. The longer you are here at CAF, the easier it is to cut and paste old responses for newbies. 😃
 
I understand what you are saying, but I believe the attitudes and ideas that spawned formal historic fundamentalism have roots in prior movements that go much further back.
 
I still have a lot of respect for the Jerry Falwell variety of fundamentalism. Falwell organized the first inter-denominational response to abortion in 1973. He also opened up shelters for unwed mothers as an alternative to abortion.
 
I understand what you are saying, but I believe the attitudes and ideas that spawned formal historic fundamentalism have roots in prior movements that go much further back.
On that I agree. I think the post Civil War period was ripe for the movement. The whole post-war atmosphere and culture was bound to produce a religious response. Even though fundamentalism originated in the North, it found it’s roots in the South.
 
I guess I’m not sure what your point is, but I hope it is not trying to paint evangelicals as uneducated second class Christians.
No, not evangelicals.
But if you have ever met a hardcore KJV-only fundamentalist, they are woefully ignorant and racist. But as I said, that is fading, at least in the North and in WV. I can’t speak for the deep South.
 
I still have a lot of respect for the Jerry Falwell variety of fundamentalism. Falwell organized the first inter-denominational response to abortion in 1973. He also opened up shelters for unwed mothers as an alternative to abortion.
Yes, I believe that evangelical Protestants share more in common with conservative Catholics on stuff like abortion, so-called gay marriage, HHS mandate, and other issues than we do with the liberal mainline denominations.

That is one of the main reasons I came to CAF, as well as enhancing and deepening my walk with Christ.

However, at times I get the impression through subtle comments here and there that Catholics (in general) consider evangelicals second-class Christians who can be categorized in certain ways and dissected in posts like this like we were a frog or something.

Forgive me if I am being a little overly-sensitive on this. :tiphat:
 
Southern fundamentalism (the historic Baptist variety) has been influenced by Bob Jones fundamentalism and KJV-only (offshoots of Hyles, Landmark, and Peter Ruckman). And they are rapidly disappearing from the landscape.
I seriously have no clue what you are talking about when you mention 400 years. The Puritans, if that is what you are referring to, were not fundamentalists. They served in some way to the ‘nostalgic’ foundation of fundamentalism. But as I said, that was based on nostalgic mythology of a ‘golden age’ of American Christianity.
In the South, American fundamentalism is better traced from the Civil War.
There IS an interesting parallel in history involving the birth of fundamentalism and the KKK. The RISE (post-Civil War and the 1920s) of both movements were similtaneous and loosely connected.
Fundamentalist forebearers, are considered ‘heroes’ to these groups, and they were pretty chummy with the Klan. Bob Jones Sr. is the most nortorious. One of the buildings on his campus is named after a state govenor and Klan grand dragon. The racism of his school continues to this very day.
Another ‘hero’ of fundamentalism was William Bell Reilly who not only was a supporter of the Klan (if they were members, they curiously kept it quiet), he also supported the infamous Protocols of Zion.
No, not the Puritans. Early in British colonization of North America, significant numbers of Scots-Irish, Borderers and no few Welsh were brought here as settlers and workers. Many of them took to the hill country, which they thought healthier than the lowlands, (though for some it was to avoid indentured servitude) first in the Appalachins, then to the Smokies, Ozarks, and so on. They were very isolated from the remainder of society, all the way up to the early 20th Century. Not much in the culture has changed even to this day, including the use of a slightly modified Elizabethan English which still persists in some remote areas.

In recent decades, they have tended to actually engage preachers, largely from the local Baptist Bible schools, but even when I was a kid they tended to draw preachers from their own congregation; preachers whose only “theological” education was their own lifetime reading of the bible and what others in the congregation said. They wouldn’t know Bob Jones University from Bob the Builder.

In the early 20th Century, the KKK, at least in this part of the country, was composed of middle class mainline protestants who lived in towns. Country fundamentalists were not part of that group. There was a brief reign by Baldknobbers after the Civil War, who were sort of Klan-like, but probably contained as many Union veterans as Confederate. The post Civil War KKK was not all that big in the hill country.

We really are talking about different things, you and me.

And there’s not much point in pasting them with racism because in most of the southern hill country, there’s nobody to be “racist” toward, or at least there wasn’t until Hispanics began coming into some of the industrial towns. Among the hill people in the Smokies and in the Ozarks, virtually all are partly Indian, and proud of it, though they don’t look it.
 
Yes, I believe that evangelical Protestants share more in common with conservative Catholics on stuff like abortion, so-called gay marriage, HHS mandate, and other issues than we do with the liberal mainline denominations.

That is one of the main reasons I came to CAF, as well as enhancing and deepening my walk with Christ.

However, at times I get the impression through subtle comments here and there that Catholics (in general) consider evangelicals second-class Christians who can be categorized in certain ways and dissected in posts like this like we were a frog or something.

Forgive me if I am being a little overly-sensitive on this. :tiphat:
Don’t mean to make you nervous. Sometimes, too, people don’t make a distinction between Fundamentalists and Evangelicals. Around here, anyway, they’re similar but they’re not the same thing. The term “Evangelical” in this part of the country is largely associated with the Assemblies of God, whose worldwide headquarters is in Springfield, Mo. “Fundamentalism” is different, much more plain and basic, with each congregation much more independent. Much more bible-and-that’s-all.

I grew up among country Fundamentalists. I also know a lot of Evanglelicals. I have nothing against either, though I would not be much of a Catholic if I didn’t believe Catholicism has the fullness of truth whereas the Fundamentalists and Evangelicals have a part of it. But it’s a respectable part.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top