B
Bonnie
Guest
Does anyone know where I could find out the history of godparents? When they started to be a part of baptism & any differences between then & now?
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
It should be noted that the above information is very dated and much no longer applies: Confirmation IS a requirement, members of religious orders MAY BE sponsors, etc.From the Catholic Encyclopedia on oce.catholic.com/index.php?title=Baptism
When infants are solemnly baptized, persons assist at the ceremony to make profession of the faith in the child’s name. **This practice comes from antiquity and is witnessed to by Tertullian, St. Basil, St. Augustine, and others. **Such persons are designated sponsores, offerentes, susceptores, fidejussores, and patrini. The English term is godfather and godmother, or in Anglo-Saxon, gossip. These sponsors, in default of the child’s parents, are obliged to instruct it concerning faith and morals. One sponsor is sufficient and not more than two are allowed. In the latter case, one should be male and the other female. The object of these restrictions is the fact that the sponsor contracts a spiritual relationship to the child and its parents which would be an impediment to marriage. Sponsors must themselves be baptized persons having the use of reason and they must have been designated as sponsors by the priest or parents. During the baptism they must physically touch the child either personally or by proxy. They are required, moreover, to have the intention of really assuming the obligations of godparents. It is desirable that they should have been confirmed, but this is not absolutely necessary. Certain persons are prohibited from acting as sponsors. They are: members of religious orders, married persons in respect to each other, or parents to their children, and in general those who are objectionable on such grounds as infidelity, heresy, excommunication, or who are members of condemned secret societies, or public sinners (Sabetti, no. 663). Sponsors are also used in the solemn baptism of adults. They are never necessary in private baptism.
I know but the OP was asking about the origins of godparents.It should be noted that the above information is very dated and much no longer applies: Confirmation IS a requirement, members of religious orders MAY BE sponsors, etc.
Anyone have a clue what this means? Would a godparent marry a baby? I mean in the old days.The object of these restrictions is the fact that the sponsor contracts a spiritual relationship to the child and its parents which would be an impediment to marriage.
It means it was not permitted. Offhand, I think it could be dispensed but would have to check.Great! That’s a start, but I guess I’ll have to look up Tertullian, et al. Maybe there are footnotes?
Anyone have a clue what this means? Would a godparent marry a baby? I mean in the old days.
This rule applied mainly to sponsors of adults being baptized which was why a person couldn’t sponsor his/her own spouse. Then again, my godfather was only 10; with only a 10 year age difference it was not inconceivable that I might want to marry him when I turned 18 or 20.Anyone have a clue what this means? Would a godparent marry a baby? I mean in the old days.