Hitler and the churches

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalt
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
By “Money Lords” I mean the families who OWN the governments of this planet. As I’m sure we all know by now, the monetary system used by the world’s government changed in 1910. That’s when we went off the old gold system and onto the new “government BORROWS credit from private international banks” system. The laws creating the US Federal Reserve were shoved through around Christmas time, when many representatives were absent for the vote. Also, the true nature of the new banking system was very obscure to most men in government. They even gave it the name :Federal Reserve" to imply that it was owned by the Federal Government (it’s not) and that is issues money backed up by gold reserves (it doesn’t). It’s owned by PRIVATE international banking cartels, and it CREATES the money on a balance sheet out of thin air! Obama borrows a TRILLION DOLLARS from them and on the balance sheet it reads $1 TRILLION credit to the owners of the Fed, and $1 TRILLION debt to the US taxpayers. And THEN the US government can issue cheques and print currency totalling $1 TRILLION.

The owners of the Fed get interest payments on this money for DOING NOTHING. It’s been this way since 1910. The same happened here in Canada when the “Bank of Canada” was created. It’s NOT owned by the Federal government in Canada. Same with the “Bank of England”. It’s all a SCAM.

So who owns the Fed? A purusal on the internet will quickly tell you. You’ll see names like “Rothschild”, “Morgan”, “Warburg” and “Leeman” amongst others. These are the RICHEST familes in the world, and they could buy and sell Bill Gates a thousand times over. Now some, but not all, of these families describe themselves as Jewish. German Jews in fact. But that’s just another smoke screen in my books. They’re actually occultists, and they are intricately tied to secret societies within secret societies. Rothschild for certain. This is why Roosevelt placed the Masonic symbolism on the back of the One Dollar bill during his “New Deal” era in the 1930’s.

And THAT’S who I mean by the “Money Lords”. They CONTROL the people we elect to “run” the government. And when the people we elect get too big for their boots, they conveniently get rid of them. I’ve heard it said that JFK made overtones in the Whitehouse about eventually doing away with the Federal Reserve system. The whole world saw what happened after that.

They are HIDING BEHIND the name “Jew”. That’s Satan’s ultimate protection! Remember the words of Our Lord:

"I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." - Rev. 2:9
As expected.

GKC
 
By “Money Lords” I mean the families who OWN the governments of this planet. As I’m sure we all know by now, the monetary system used by the world’s government changed in 1910. That’s when we went off the old gold system and onto the new “government BORROWS credit from private international banks” system. The laws creating the US Federal Reserve were shoved through around Christmas time, when many representatives were absent for the vote. Also, the true nature of the new banking system was very obscure to most men in government. They even gave it the name :Federal Reserve" to imply that it was owned by the Federal Government (it’s not) and that is issues money backed up by gold reserves (it doesn’t). It’s owned by PRIVATE international banking cartels, and it CREATES the money on a balance sheet out of thin air! Obama borrows a TRILLION DOLLARS from them and on the balance sheet it reads $1 TRILLION credit to the owners of the Fed, and $1 TRILLION debt to the US taxpayers. And THEN the US government can issue cheques and print currency totalling $1 TRILLION.

The owners of the Fed get interest payments on this money for DOING NOTHING. It’s been this way since 1910. The same happened here in Canada when the “Bank of Canada” was created. It’s NOT owned by the Federal government in Canada. Same with the “Bank of England”. It’s all a SCAM.

So who owns the Fed? A purusal on the internet will quickly tell you. You’ll see names like “Rothschild”, “Morgan”, “Warburg” and “Leeman” amongst others. These are the RICHEST familes in the world, and they could buy and sell Bill Gates a thousand times over. Now some, but not all, of these families describe themselves as Jewish. German Jews in fact. But that’s just another smoke screen in my books. They’re actually occultists, and they are intricately tied to secret societies within secret societies. Rothschild for certain. This is why Roosevelt placed the Masonic symbolism on the back of the One Dollar bill during his “New Deal” era in the 1930’s.

And THAT’S who I mean by the “Money Lords”. They CONTROL the people we elect to “run” the government. And when the people we elect get too big for their boots, they conveniently get rid of them. I’ve heard it said that JFK made overtones in the Whitehouse about eventually doing away with the Federal Reserve system. The whole world saw what happened after that.

They are HIDING BEHIND the name “Jew”. That’s Satan’s ultimate protection! Remember the words of Our Lord:

"I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." - Rev. 2:9
:hmmm:

:hypno::hypno::hypno:

:doh2:
 
GKC,

“As expected”? What’s THAT supposed to mean?

You think the attack on Pearl Harbour was a surprise? You think JFK was killed by one crazy dude named Lee Harvey Oswald? You think America was brought to its knees on 9-11 by 19 men carrying box cutters? You think a plane flew into the Pentagon and left NO plane wreckage? You think flight 93 crashed into the ground in PA and left NO wreckage? You think that Congress, relaxing the controls on investment banking, didn’t know that it would lead to a financial collapse and a forced BAIL OUT by the Fed? I pity you, I really do.

I’m sorry if I know too much for my own good, but I’m one of the last remnants of a public education system that was designed by Christians (yes, we once actually did read the BIBLE every morning in government-run Canadian Public Schools). But in another 30 years, when we’re all dead and gone, the puppet masters at the top of the power pyramid will cease to have any opposition. And then EVERYONE will be quite happy to pay money to watch the TV sitcoms and controlled news stories that will tell them what to think and when to think it.

Listen, I think it best if I just leave this post. I really don’t want to upset too many apple carts.

I truly wish you all the best. Stay close to Jesus. God bless. 🙂
 
That means that you played true to expected form.

I likely know far more about Pearl Harbor than you; it’s a hobby of mine, part of those 20,000 books. Including Stinnett, Costello, Clausen and Lee, Rusbridger and Nave, Tansill, Bartlett and Toland, inter alia, on the conspiracy side, the usual (Prange, et al, Lord, etc) on the standard side.

In fact, whacko conspiracy theories of many sorts, including your listed favorites, are one of my lesser hobbies. Folks who buy into that paranoia in one area tend to be attracted to others as well. It’s an interesting psychological effect.

Thank you for the pity, and for not upsetting my apple carts. I would likely get a stomach ache and have to sleep with a night light, were you to do so. And I’m of an age when I recall the Bible reading, to start the school day, too. I do not think you need worry about knowing too much for your own good

On the Fed Reserve scenario, you left out Jekyll Island. My favorite part.

GKC
GKC,

“As expected”? What’s THAT supposed to mean?

You think the attack on Pearl Harbour was a surprise? You think JFK was killed by one crazy dude named Lee Harvey Oswald? You think America was brought to its knees on 9-11 by 19 men carrying box cutters? You think a plane flew into the Pentagon and left NO plane wreckage? You think flight 93 crashed into the ground in PA and left NO wreckage? You think that Congress, relaxing the controls on investment banking, didn’t know that it would lead to a financial collapse and a forced BAIL OUT by the Fed? I pity you, I really do.

I’m sorry if I know too much for my own good, but I’m one of the last remnants of a public education system that was designed by Christians (yes, we once actually did read the BIBLE every morning in government-run Canadian Public Schools). But in another 30 years, when we’re all dead and gone, the puppet masters at the top of the power pyramid will cease to have any opposition. And then EVERYONE will be quite happy to pay money to watch the TV sitcoms and controlled news stories that will tell them what to think and when to think it.

Listen, I think it best if I just leave this post. I really don’t want to upset too many apple carts.

I truly wish you all the best. Stay close to Jesus. God bless. 🙂
 
That means that you played true to expected form.

I likely know far more about Pearl Harbor than you; it’s a hobby of mine, part of those 20,000 books. Including Stinnett, Costello, Clausen and Lee, Rusbridger and Nave, Tansill, Bartlett and Toland, inter alia, on the conspiracy side, the usual (Prange, et al, Lord, etc) on the standard side.

In fact, whacko conspiracy theories of many sorts, including your listed favorites, are one of my lesser hobbies. Folks who buy into that paranoia in one area tend to be attracted to others as well. It’s an interesting psychological effect.

Thank you for the pity, and for not upsetting my apple carts. I would likely get a stomach ache and have to sleep with a night light, were you to do so. And I’m of an age when I recall the Bible reading, to start the school day, too. I do not think you need worry about knowing too much for your own good

On the Fed Reserve scenario, you left out Jekyll Island. My favorite part.

GKC
Your posts only prove that you’re a good reader…:rolleyes:
 
GKC,

“As expected”? What’s THAT supposed to mean?

You think the attack on Pearl Harbour was a surprise? You think JFK was killed by one crazy dude named Lee Harvey Oswald? You think America was brought to its knees on 9-11 by 19 men carrying box cutters? You think a plane flew into the Pentagon and left NO plane wreckage? You think flight 93 crashed into the ground in PA and left NO wreckage? You think that Congress, relaxing the controls on investment banking, didn’t know that it would lead to a financial collapse and a forced BAIL OUT by the Fed? I pity you, I really do.

I’m sorry if I know too much for my own good, but I’m one of the last remnants of a public education system that was designed by Christians (yes, we once actually did read the BIBLE every morning in government-run Canadian Public Schools). But in another 30 years, when we’re all dead and gone, the puppet masters at the top of the power pyramid will cease to have any opposition. And then EVERYONE will be quite happy to pay money to watch the TV sitcoms and controlled news stories that will tell them what to think and when to think it.

Listen, I think it best if I just leave this post. I really don’t want to upset too many apple carts.

I truly wish you all the best. Stay close to Jesus. God bless. 🙂
No, don’t leave. People don’t want to hear the truth, or anything that implies a path that isn’t straight if you know what I mean. Seems you can’t have your own opinion, or an opinion that is fact here because if others hadn’t heard it, or you don’t have “evidence” of it, it must be a lie, or you are crazy. People need to chill out and respect what others have to say, even if it is what they don’t want to hear.
 
No, don’t leave. People don’t want to hear the truth, or anything that implies a path that isn’t straight if you know what I mean. Seems you can’t have your own opinion, or an opinion that is fact here because if others hadn’t heard it, or you don’t have “evidence” of it, it must be a lie, or you are crazy. People need to chill out and respect what others have to say, even if it is what they don’t want to hear.
As when you didn’t want to hear that Bishop Williamson said that no Jews were killed by gassing. Which you denied he had said, in the face of the video, repeatedly.

GKC
 
Your posts only prove that you’re a good reader…:rolleyes:
Or that he buys a lot of books (and hasn’t read one of them). Or that he does many Amazon searches.

On a forum like this, there is no way to know for sure that someone is telling you the truth about themselves. You can provide proof of the other things you claim, though, and it’s up to the one making the claim to prove it. If you don’t have the proof, either don’t make the claim or expect that the claim will be challenged.

There was a time when educated men collected books simply for the pleasure of having a “library”. They didn’t necessarily read most of what they acquired, acquiring many volumes in lots. Sets of books with nice bindings were favorites, regardless of the subject. So, a man with no interest in botany would have several volumes on the subject because they looked nice on the shelf.

I’m not saying that this is the case with the other poster–just giving you a little historical background on personal libraries. I would be surprised if this weren’t true today. Antique book collectors don’t read what they acquire, usually, either the old version they have or a newer printing.
 
GKC,

“As expected”? What’s THAT supposed to mean?

You think the attack on Pearl Harbour was a surprise? You think JFK was killed by one crazy dude named Lee Harvey Oswald? You think America was brought to its knees on 9-11 by 19 men carrying box cutters? You think a plane flew into the Pentagon and left NO plane wreckage? You think flight 93 crashed into the ground in PA and left NO wreckage? You think that Congress, relaxing the controls on investment banking, didn’t know that it would lead to a financial collapse and a forced BAIL OUT by the Fed? I pity you, I really do.

I’m sorry if I know too much for my own good, but I’m one of the last remnants of a public education system that was designed by Christians (yes, we once actually did read the BIBLE every morning in government-run Canadian Public Schools). But in another 30 years, when we’re all dead and gone, the puppet masters at the top of the power pyramid will cease to have any opposition. And then EVERYONE will be quite happy to pay money to watch the TV sitcoms and controlled news stories that will tell them what to think and when to think it.

Listen, I think it best if I just leave this post. I really don’t want to upset too many apple carts.

I truly wish you all the best. Stay close to Jesus. God bless. 🙂
You seem to be very informed and, more importantly, concerned about these plots. What is your background? What are you doing to prevent the future you imagine from becoming a reality?
 
Not really related to this particular subject, but related to respect - I wish Americans would realize that they are expected to respect the office of president, but aren’t required to respect the person holding the office. We are free to say that the person in office is a liar and to impeach the person. It’s been done before.

It’s funny that the conspiracy theorists on the forum claim that Hollywood has given us our version of 9/11, Pearl Harbor, the Kennedy Assasination, and so on, yet it is Hollywood that gives us so many versions of the conspiracy theories. If it weren’t for “Hollywood”, I never would have heard of these theories. Hollywood, not surprisingly, is about storytelling. What’s a better story than a anti-establishment conspiracy theory?

I’ve heard the “official” versions of these events in history books and other mainstream publications. It’s only from Hollywood that I’ve heard the conspiracies.

It appears that Hollywood, rather than giving us the party line, has given us the conspiracy theory version.

Conspiracy theorists on the forum, it seems that Hollywood is on your side! 🙂
 
The Catholic Church was not apart of the problem of the Nazi movement. Pope Pius XII is getting a bad rap nowadays for other reasons.

What the Catholic Church did do, however, is help in establishing the poisonous world that led to the rise of the fascist Nazis.

The Nazis themselves (the higher ups) were certainly not Christians; they were a German pagans; but they used “techniques” [and I’m not talking about torture, I’m talking more about scholarly techniques] developed by the Church in the 18th and 19th centuries that made it easier for the Nazis to justify their arguments in a more persuasive manner to the general public.
 
The Catholic Church was not apart of the problem of the Nazi movement. Pope Pius XII is getting a bad rap nowadays for other reasons.

What the Catholic Church did do, however, is help in establishing the poisonous world that led to the rise of the fascist Nazis.

The Nazis themselves (the higher ups) were certainly not Christians; they were a German pagans; but they used “techniques” [and I’m not talking about torture, I’m talking more about scholarly techniques] developed by the Church in the 18th and 19th centuries that made it easier for the Nazis to justify their arguments in a more persuasive manner to the general public.
Can you give us some specific examples? From the Church and the Nazis.
 
Can you give us some specific examples? From the Church and the Nazis.
First, the Nazi paganism is well documented.

Secondly, I would suggest reading of the throne and alter conservative movement in Continental Europe. Then I would suggest comparing this to the documents of the medieval world. The “ancien regime” so desired never existed; just as the Aryan past was a fabrication.

This essay atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/GF01Aa02.html comes to some similar conclusions, and is much more lucid in presenting them than I could ever be.
 
Or that he buys a lot of books (and hasn’t read one of them). Or that he does many Amazon searches.

On a forum like this, there is no way to know for sure that someone is telling you the truth about themselves. You can provide proof of the other things you claim, though, and it’s up to the one making the claim to prove it. If you don’t have the proof, either don’t make the claim or expect that the claim will be challenged.

There was a time when educated men collected books simply for the pleasure of having a “library”. They didn’t necessarily read most of what they acquired, acquiring many volumes in lots. Sets of books with nice bindings were favorites, regardless of the subject. So, a man with no interest in botany would have several volumes on the subject because they looked nice on the shelf.

I’m not saying that this is the case with the other poster–just giving you a little historical background on personal libraries. I would be surprised if this weren’t true today. Antique book collectors don’t read what they acquire, usually, either the old version they have or a newer printing.
Very true. In my 11 years in the business of selling books, I spent 4 in the rare and OP world. I can recall people who needed books as decorations. Loved that sort, they bought by color of bindings a lot.

And no, I haven’t read all my books. There’s a small blue one I’ve been saving for a rainy day.

I added 40 books to the total, yesterday; a friend was liquidating his small holdings and gave me first pick. That 40 included about 8 duplicates, that will make fine gifts.

And if you suspect me of acquiring these things purely as wall coverings myself, try engaging me on one of my topics. Say, Chesterton, who I’ve collected and studied for over 45 years. Or parts of Tudor history, such as Hank’s Great Matter. Or parts of WWII that I concentrate on. Some folks here know me from that.

Books are my hobby because of what I find in them. Now if only I could get the library addition built to the house (I’m aiming at 1000 sq. feet) and stop storing 2/3s of them in attic, garage and rented storage. Before I die, I hope.

GKC
 
Very true. In my 11 years in the business of selling books, I spent 4 in the rare and OP world. I can recall people who needed books as decorations. Loved that sort, they bought by color of bindings a lot.

And no, I haven’t read all my books. There’s a small blue one I’ve been saving for a rainy day.

I added 40 books to the total, yesterday; a friend was liquidating his small holdings and gave me first pick. That 40 included about 8 duplicates, that will make fine gifts.

And if you suspect me of acquiring these things purely as wall coverings myself, try engaging me on one of my topics. Say, Chesterton, who I’ve collected and studied for over 45 years. Or parts of Tudor history, such as Hank’s Great Matter. Or parts of WWII that I concentrate on. Some folks here know me from that.

Books are my hobby because of what I find in them. Now if only I could get the library addition built to the house (I’m aiming at 1000 sq. feet) and stop storing 2/3s of them in attic, garage and rented storage. Before I die, I hope.

GKC
Not doubting you. Just commenting on personal claims on the Net. And personal libraries.
 
Very true. In my 11 years in the business of selling books, I spent 4 in the rare and OP world. I can recall people who needed books as decorations. Loved that sort, they bought by color of bindings a lot.

And no, I haven’t read all my books. There’s a small blue one I’ve been saving for a rainy day.

I added 40 books to the total, yesterday; a friend was liquidating his small holdings and gave me first pick. That 40 included about 8 duplicates, that will make fine gifts.

And if you suspect me of acquiring these things purely as wall coverings myself, try engaging me on one of my topics. Say, Chesterton, who I’ve collected and studied for over 45 years. Or parts of Tudor history, such as Hank’s Great Matter. Or parts of WWII that I concentrate on. Some folks here know me from that.

Books are my hobby because of what I find in them. Now if only I could get the library addition built to the house (I’m aiming at 1000 sq. feet) and stop storing 2/3s of them in attic, garage and rented storage. Before I die, I hope.

GKC
You must be one of our oldest members. If you read one book per day, and read only the books that you’ve decided to purchase and keep, and nothing else, it took you more than 54 years to get through all of those books!
 
You must be one of our oldest members. If you read one book per day, and read only the books that you’ve decided to purchase and keep, and nothing else, it took you more than 54 years to get through all of those books!
I suspect I am one of the oldest members, as suggested by my 45 years of collecting and studying Chesterton (and Belloc and Lewis and Tolkien and others of that ilk). But the hobby started 10 years earlier, when I was in the 6th grade, and bought Dekker’s DEFEAT AT SEA, GERMAN RAIDER “ATLANTIS” (author forgotten, packed away) Ruppelt’s THE REPORT ON UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS and Carr and Doyle’s collection of pastiches, THE EXPLOITS OF SHERLOCK HOLMES. In each of these areas I’ve continued to collect and read for those 55 years or so. And added many other areas along the way. And I have no expectation of living long enough to read all I own, but I’ll give it a shot. The others are ready reference, until then. I rarely use the internet for research (though I will, to jog my memory). I prefer books. On another RC board a question was raised recenty about a point related to Mary, Queen of Scots’ excecution at Fotheringhay. I found the point in two of my books on her, one of which I had read, one of which awaits reading. Owning both, I could reference both, by page, if needed. I like that.

In short, I love books. Buying books, reading books, collecting books, using books, living with books. And, like Scrooge McDuck and his money, I like tossing them up in the air and letting them hit me on the head (See " Only a Poor Old Man", UNCLE SCROOGE COMICS, 1952).

GKC
 
Books are my hobby because of what I find in them. Now if only I could get the library addition built to the house (I’m aiming at 1000 sq. feet) and stop storing 2/3s of them in attic, garage and rented storage. Before I die, I hope.
GKC, I hope the climate where you live is not too damp (for the sake of your books in the attic and garage).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top