A
anamchara
Guest
This isn’t cool. Do you really want to take this discussion to it’s most ridiculous, irrelevant conclusions, or should we focus on the matter at hand? (No pun int.) Because if you really want to play that way, lets talk about the poster a few pages back who refuses to even do the sign of peace- part of the liturgy- because any ackowledgement whatsoever of the people sitting next to her will take her focus from God.
This is, of course, ludicrous, and so are the conclusions some of you are making. I am talking ONLY about the practice of joining hands during the Our Father prayer at mass. Period. Don’t throw in a bunch of other stuff and accuse me of advocating for that, too. Please don’t accuse me of denying the Sacrifice if I admit that I enjoy the fellowship of the mass and the Lord’s Supper. Don’t tell me I’m putting community before God because I didn’t do that, and you’re only weakening the legitimate use of that accusation.
The Church acknowledges that it’s common among the laity to join hands for the Our Father. The practice would have been condemned if it was truly worthy of condemnation. It’s a very brief, unofficial, optional outward sign of fellowhsip that the congregation can take part in or opt out of.
Someone, somewhere had to introduce the practice to the mass. But I don’t see it as a a “meaningless addition” -and I think I speak for a lot of people in my age group- because it’s always been done, as far back as I can remember (20+ years) and in various parishes in 3 states. No, I am not saying that just because something is a common practice, that makes it right. I am saying that choosing to hold your neighbor’s hand during this short prayer is right because there’s nothing wrong with it.
If you don’t like it, just don’t think twice about it!

