C
ciero
Guest
Vico, pray tell what Bishop and chancery you are referring too? I would like to speak to him myself. I cant believe you are being given this info from a Byzantine catholic bishop in the year 2010. Thank you. Feel free to PM me if you are reluctant to post this info publicly.In understanding I am following the advice of the Eparchial Bishop to use the book “Inter-Ecclesial Relations Between Eastern and Latin Catholics”. An adaptation of rite is issued by the Congregation for the Eastern Churches. This is described on page 9 of that book. The issues about the legality of administering the sacraments is throughly described in this book also, which is the source of my posted comments (in addition to my pastor and the chancery), not my speculation or personal opinion.
Previous I said: “What I mean by automatically is: without a specific com[m]itment by the Church. It is not lawful when they are Christian faithful of other Churches sui iuris if they are not his subjects, unless through another title or danger of death.” And you object to the words the words committed and entrusted, because they are not the word commitment, and because there is no canonical definition.
I can recommend that you read the book I reference to see what I am talking about with regard to each sacrament, and also in general for the canons included for the preservation of the individual rites and the rights and obligations of the faithful.