H
hansgeorg
Guest
1 If that had been true, that is exactly why a man before teaching 1st and 2d Baltimore Catechisms should have in youth already mastered 3d and then go through 4th. And maybe read Aquinas too.True. We were taught the Catechism by memorization by teachers who’d been taught the same. Asking questions was useless, they had no answers. (1)
We learned the 10 commandments by rote but didn’t know what some of them meant. “Thou shall not steal” is easy “Thou shall not commit adultery” less so if you have nobody who’ll tell you what adultery is. Even more difficult was leaning them in French where that commandment was rendered as “Thou shall desire the act of the flesh only within marriage.” Uh?? (2)
2 Seems the priest who invested in 20 volumes Oxford English Dictionary did a good deed. You could have looked up “desire” and “the act of the flesh” (see “flesh”, one of senses will include “act of”) and “only” and “within” and “marriage”.
Actually I think there was a lot of pests in one generation asking a lot of questions that not only embarrassed previous prudish generation, but were calculated to do so.
If a Catechist was not able to answer the content of VI and IX commandments as “what your parents did in bed in order to make you, you must only do in bed with your wives and husbands when you marry and likewise for desiring it, you must not desire it before you are married or desire to do it with other persons,” it is clearly not a question of understanding lacking in someone who only memorised words, but a probable refusal to go into sidelines that might arouse curiosity.
Dreadful thing before a class raised on all other fronts to have their curiosities aroused, it might be? But that was not the fault of catechists, but of Frankfurt school.