K
KellyPalmer
Guest
You make some excellent points. Generally, intervention in pregnancy is only beneficial when there is a medical problem going on. Intervention as standard may help those who need it but may harm those who don’t. Most people don’t. Also, it is true that unless a c-section is done, it can’t be said that a provider “did all they could”. This is a motivational factor in unnecessary c-sections but I think it’s important to note that there are many other factors as well. One study explored when inductions and c-sections are most likely to occur and it corresponded with the convenience of a dr. For example, so-called medically indicated c-sections are significantly more likely to happen just before dinner each night and especially so on Fridays, just before the weekend.No, I don’t want to imply at all that women “cheated” on their preventative care. I meant to imply that more of them can’t afford it, so thank you for clarifying that (as it could be inferred from my mention of diabetics who take their pills but don’t change their diets!)
When you have a system where everyone gets care, you automatically lower the intervention mentality, too–for better and for worse, because the system has an incentive to avoid interventions. When you have a system that anyone might sue even if the doctor (or midwife) is not at fault, you almost enforce an intervention mentality, because nobody can afford to go into court and face the accusation that they “did nothing” when there is some intervention that could have been tried.
It could be that an “intervention” mentality increases good outcomes in preemies, but actually works against the highest number of good outcomes in full term babies. For instance, it was found that avoiding surgery was a good strategy for a lot of carpal tunnel cases because the health care system in some countries enforced a wait-and-see “treatment plan” because of the waiting list for OKd surgeries was so long! They could compare the outcomes of those who got treatment promptly and those who had to wait around, and the ones forced to wait around did better. Getting better by doing nothing and only getting surgery when doing nothing failed to work was the best strategy. When there is the money to do something, though, people want that, especially when waiting around is painful and the condition is debilitating. When the system says, “sorry, it is the best we can do”, though, then it isn’t malpractice to do nothing.
We have Tricare Prime where everyone’s care is covered 100% and the intervention rates are not lower. In fact, in many cases, intervention rate is higher even though active duty members are prohibited from suing. And I don’t think diabetic rates are lower among those with Tricare. Medicaid doesn’t appear to have lower intervention rates either. I would also note that low income women are eligible for free or low cost maternity coverage.
Parents do demand that drs do but this is because drs throughout history have created such a culture. With obestetrics, they did not have good evidence to start with and still to this day there is a major lacking, only 1/3 of recommendations put out by the governing body of Obstetricians (ACOG) is based on good evidence. Parents themselves, taking the time to read up on the science, are the ones who have formed a small but vocal and growing minority to impact change in this arena. I hope to see that continue.