O
otjm
Guest
Your concern is too narrow to respond to, as you do not expand on what the history lesson (or bureaucratic lesson) was about.So do I. Preach on the Gospel (and the Epistle), not on the hierarchy of the Church.
If it was simply pedantic and totally structurally oriented, then I would agree with you. I do not see it as wrong in any way to get some history or structure, as that can often be tied to what is currently happening (e.g. who was at the first round of the synod on family, and why) as it reflects on what is currently happening in the Church; but I would want it to be tied to “where the Church is going and why”.
Having known a number of “new” priests, I find that no two are alike; and some are better than others at homiletic; a few are excellent, and a few might find that they will never be able to deliver from the pulpit.