Your logic leads to hate, not love:
Due to the actions of their priests, Catholics have reason in our generation to be suspicious of the behaviours and morals of adult male heterosexuals.
Due to the actions of various terrorist groups, people have reason in our generation to be suspicious of the behaviours and morals of people from most all countries in the middle east and of most all religions.
Due to the actions of various professed Catholics, people have reason in our generation to be suspicious of the behaviours and morals of Catholics.
Due to the actions of certain women politicians, people have reason in our generation to be suspicious of the behaviours and morals of women politicians.
and so on…
One of two things, Either this person missed or is ignoring my point, thus he or she has hijacked my thread,
Or this person believes that my fear of triggered memories of acts between two males is irrelevent, and that the ‘rights’ of homosexuals trump my right to feel safe, and to heal.
I really hope its the former, because the latter is sinful, judgemental, and downright apathetic to not only me, but hundreds of thousands ( millions? ) of others who go through similar events, and just want to heal. Part of healing is dealing with triggers. Or in my case trying to resist the urge to run screaming from the room, upon that trigger of sexual acts between two males. Not on account of the acts themselves, but because of the memories I still am struggling with.
You can use your argument to shape a justification for suspiciousness of everyone. I don’t think its valid. I think, yes, there is plenty of reason why you can be suspicious of EVERYBODY. But I think that you shouldn’t discriminate by group, because the logic doesn’t hold up.