P
PbloPicasso
Guest
Well, aside from the fact that this thread has been resurrected over the past 2 years with huge gaps in between, explain the married priesthood looking only at the theology presented. Sure, it’s symbolic, not required other than discipline. Homosexual attraction is a serious problem from my own experience running from gay seminarians and priests so much that I ultimately found no support for my vocation in the diocese and ended up fleeing away from near occasion of sin that didn’t interest me anyway. Ultimately, I became a really hardened anti-Catholic fundamentalist (more like returning to my roots) . I am not alone and have found men like me that have returned home humbled by truth in history, not the inspiration of sinful clergy. Clergy abuse is nothing new, I’ve seen the same thing among fundamentalists. I would never trivialize adult homosexuality the way I’ve seen so many Catholics. A mortal sin will still produce hell for an unrepentant soul. But thankfully, I see much change since I’ve returned home to the Catholic Church.So I didn’t get through all pages of posts, but from what I did see nobody mentioned what the priesthood represents. It is a marriage between the man and the Church. The same type of marriage that Jesus has with the Church. Jesus is the bridegroom and the Church is the bride. Sooooo does that make sense that someone who is attracted to men would want to marry a female entity, which the Church is. I’m not saying this to bash anyone by the way, I’m just simply trying to be logical.
Start a new thread.