A
andrewstx
Guest
The Episcopal church is the American version of the C of E, now you know.LOL Don’t even know that church but LOL
The Episcopal church is the American version of the C of E, now you know.LOL Don’t even know that church but LOL
You cannot re-define the terminology used by the Church. First Natural Law it is not simply what is normal for a man or a woman to do, if you go to a book of moral theology you can see that the Church is very careful in the language that she uses.The church is saying that by “natural law” it means what is normal for a man or woman to feel/do. Stating that homosexual thoughts/acts are not normal, therefore a mental disorder.
I don’t want to fight either, but discussion would be good. Perhaps this is a semantics problem. Phrases often mean different things to different people.Look it up yourself. The church says its a MENTAL disorder NOT a moral one. Look I dont like to fight.
Sorry; its not like having an inclination towards evil. If you develop sexual attraction towards the same sex instead of the opposite sex, then this represents an error in ones sexual development. Its a disorder; and it possibly has genetic elements to it as well.I don’t want to fight either, but discussion would be good. Perhaps this is a semantics problem. Phrases often mean different things to different people.
What I hear you objecting to is the idea that if SSA is a “moral disorder” than you are a bad person if you have it, while if it is mental, that’s just a sickness that isn’t your fault. I’d like to suggest a different way of looking at it.
Moral disorder describes ALL humans since Original Sin. We each just have different ones. You’re very brave to share one particular one of yours. Everybody else here has plenty of their own. Calvinism sees the effects of this as being humans are totally depraved (bad people). Not cool. Catholicism says it leaves us good, but fallen. Like a Shakesperean tragic hero. That’s how God sees us (and why Shakespeare still resonates in the human heart).
You can’t necessarily help the evils you are inclined towards. All you can do is struggle to control them and accept the Grace to do good instead. God bless.
I don’t know if what you are saying is correct. But I suppose I should have (and did think of it at the time) stated as I posted the Catechism text for you, that I did it at your request but had no intention or enough information to be able to start therefore after any debate or discussion about the topic. Sorry.You cannot re-define the terminology used by the Church. First Natural Law it is not simply what is normal for a man or a woman to do, if you go to a book of moral theology you can see that the Church is very careful in the language that she uses.
When the Church talks about acts like in the case of homosexual acts she refers to something determined by the will; however, same sex attraction is a thought but it is not determined by the will.
Moral disorder is not a mental disorder, you are mixing two aspects of the human nature: the spiritual one and the physical one. Concupiscence is a generalized moral disorder but nobody in his right mind would call it a mental disorder. If a married man is attracted by a magazine showing a naked women on the cover he has a moral disorder but he does not have a mental illness.
Yes the link is the right one. The letter talks quite a bit about the nature of the disorder.
I do not want you to feel sorry. I was just trying to make sure that people understand that more often than not some Church documents tell much more than what we think. In the thread about Dogmas re-formulation there is a very good post from a very well educated religious brother (I encourage you to read his posts here on CAF, I learned a lot from him) that states:I don’t know if what you are saying is correct. But I suppose I should have (and did think of it at the time) stated as I posted the Catechism text for you, that I did it at your request but had no intention or enough information to be able to start therefore after any debate or discussion about the topic. Sorry.
What he is implying is not that we should not read or quote the CCC but that we should really make the effort of digging much deeper than we originally planned if we really want to understand the intricacies and origins of the statements in the CCC.The issue is that the CCC assumes that you know what came before. If you notice, it gives you references in the margins or and footnotes, as well as end notes. When you go to those references, they are based on other writings that came before them and so forth down the line.
Unless the reader is either familiar with what came before or is willing to do the reading going as far back as it may take you, then it’s not such a good book for the person in the pew.
I’m straight, but I admit I have many sins.The only reason why I’m writing this is because I’m sick and tired of being called ‘evil’ just because of my sexual orientation.
Same with me, but I’m still a sinner. I’ve never been in jail, I’ve never been to court (unless you count Small Claims as being in court, and at that I was the one suing for money), I’ve never been arrested, I’ve never paid a fine except for traffic violations, I don’t think I’ve been in more than 10 fights that got physical my entire life including elementary and highschool. But I am a sinner, even though what most people see is someone who abides by the rules and social norms, I have many sins.I strongly believe I’m a loving person. I love my life, my family and friends. ALL human beings are creatures of love, no matter what they are attracted to.
No one is evil. Only the devil is evil. But when we give in to the devil, then we do evil things.At the end of the day that’s all it is, a sexual orientation. Just because I’m gay doesnt mean I’m ‘evil’. I’m tired of the Catholic Church in particular persuading people that it’s wrong. It is not, nor has it ever been.
A child benefits from the nourishment of a loving father and a loving mother. Men and women are different. They are different physically, they are different psychologically. Two men or two women can never equate to the complete love and affection one man and one woman will give to a child.In reference to another thread about gay couples being allowed to adopt, to quote one of this websites answers “Adoption is for the benefit of the child involved”. Are you saying a child is better to be in a foster home rather than be adopted by a same-sex couple? I am telling you that any child would be lucky to have two dads or two mothers.
I have ADD, I was born this way too. Does that mean people have to accept the fact that oftentimes I act lazy even though I don’t mean to, that I forget little details because I wasn’t paying attention even though I wanted to pay attention, that I can’t look at a person straight in the eye when talking to them, that sometimes I do something completely obnoxious and insane that even I cannot explain why I did it? Many who have ADD do end up in jail, perhaps they should just let them go because we are born this way. Is it enough of a justification? If a person is born blind, should they just embrace that even if they have a chance to gain sight?Homosexuality is not contagious, its not caused by mothers ‘loving’ their child that bit too much. I was born this way.
I actually sympathize with all the gay men and women who have been physically and emotionally abused because of what they are dealing with. But that doesn’t change the fact that homosexuality is wrong. We should treat each other with respect and dignity because we are all human beings, and at the same time help and encourage each other to live the life that God expects us to live. What we have been given being born this way, with you being attracted to the same sex, with my ADD, it is indeed a cross that God has given us. It is not an excuse to make justification to what we have, but rather it give us the chance to achieve holiness by overcoming this hurdle we are born with. It actually gives me motivation to live more like God (be perfect as the Father in heaven is perfect) because if I make it then I know when Christ resurrects me on the last day, I will have no more ADD. I will for the first time think clearly without the assistance of medication. The wonderful part is I do get a glimpse of what heaven would be like, even a small bit for it.I always wonder why the Church continues this mentality, when thousands of people (teenagers in particular) are committing suicide because they can’t live with being gay because YOU are telling them they are evil?
I know the chances of a half decent rebuttal to this is slim, but I had to let you know my opinion.
-Johnny
Yes I know you are right. So many subjects in the Catechism, so many literal works to look into even just for a small answer.I do not want you to feel sorry. I was just trying to make sure that people understand that more often than not some Church documents tell much more than what we think. In the thread about Dogmas re-formulation there is a very good post from a very well educated religious brother (I encourage you to read his posts here on CAF, I learned a lot from him) that states:
What he is implying is not that we should not read or quote the CCC but that we should really make the effort of digging much deeper than we originally planned if we really want to understand the intricacies and origins of the statements in the CCC.
You are making a very valid point and that is why the Church told us in several occasions that we really need to use our own reason to develop our faith. I still think that usually the opinions on CAF are a very good starting point for our own research. Reading threads in this forum really helped me a lot of times in reaching a correct understanding much faster than if I were left do do a search from scratch on my own.Yes I know you are right. So many subjects in the Catechism, so many literal works to look into even just for a small answer.
…and the problem really is, even if you ask for an answer here you may get a wrong one that claims to be accurate according to the CCC. It’s quite worrying. You can’t simply take anyones word for it. You have to find out yourself.
I would turn to the Apologists for accurate answers, not the members of this board. Very few here are experienced Apologists. Many are speaking from opinion. That’s just life.Yes I know you are right. So many subjects in the Catechism, so many literal works to look into even just for a small answer.
…and the problem really is, even if you ask for an answer here you may get a wrong one that claims to be accurate according to the CCC. It’s quite worrying. You can’t simply take anyones word for it. You have to find out yourself.
A starting point yes. This is where it all started for me.You are making a very valid point and that is why the Church told us in several occasions that we really need to use our own reason to develop our faith. I still think that usually the opinions on CAF are a very good starting point for our own research. Reading threads in this forum really helped me a lot of times in reaching a correct understanding much faster than if I were left do do a search from scratch on my own.
They never respond.I would turn to the Apologists for accurate answers, not the members of this board.
I wish they wouldn’t.Very few here are experienced Apologists. Many are speaking from opinion. That’s just life.
Have you tried private messages? Sometimes the Ask an Apologist thead won’t get an answer because a question has been addressed repeatedly BUT they are generally very good about answering private messages.They never respond.
I wish they wouldn’t.
The Catholic Church has never called you evil.The only reason why I’m writing this is because I’m sick and tired of being called ‘evil’ just because of my sexual orientation.
Just last year you were here telling us that you were very confused.I strongly believe I’m a loving person. I love my life, my family and friends. ALL human beings are creatures of love, no matter what they are attracted to.
At the end of the day that’s all it is, a sexual orientation. Just because I’m gay doesnt mean I’m ‘evil’. I’m tired of the Catholic Church in particular persuading people that it’s wrong. It is not, nor has it ever been.
In reference to another thread about gay couples being allowed to adopt, to quote one of this websites answers “Adoption is for the benefit of the child involved”. Are you saying a child is better to be in a foster home rather than be adopted by a same-sex couple? I am telling you that any child would be lucky to have two dads or two mothers.
Again I question your posts from last year stating that you were confused?Homosexuality is not contagious, its not caused by mothers ‘loving’ their child that bit too much. I was born this way.
Again, the Catholic Church doesn’t tell anyone that they are evil. Where have you heard this?I always wonder why the Church continues this mentality, when thousands of people (teenagers in particular) are committing suicide because they can’t live with being gay because YOU are telling them they are evil?
Hopefully you will come back and respond to some of the statements that have been made.I know the chances of a half decent rebuttal to this is slim, but I had to let you know my opinion.
-Johnny
Dear Johnny,T
I always wonder why the Church continues this mentality, when thousands of people (teenagers in particular) are committing suicide because they can’t live with being gay because YOU are telling them they are evil?
-Johnny