Don’t use NARTH, they have no credibility
What was his argument?
There are thousands of posts on homosexuality here at CAF. I did a search for you and picked out a few threads that I thought you may be interested in reading. There are many others, though, so if what I found isn’t useful for you, you can still use the search feature and find a lot of other threads to read which may be helpful to you. Good luck with your future discussions!
Why do you say that?
I have seen two male animals bond, two male dogs and there were bitches around too so it wasn’t hormones causing them to mount everything. When one got hit by a car and died the other dog stayed by the body until it died.
Nicolosi has been discredited according to the secular world.
They aren’t arguing that everyone should be gay, they want to be able to marry to force people to recognize their relationships.
snort
telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/5550488/Homosexual-behaviour-widespread-in-animals-according-to-new-study.html
Homosexual anal sex is no more or less risky than heterosexual anal sex. Also, according to this logic you should be fine with female homosexuals then.
That is such a load of …
Should we outlaw the mating of infertiles too? Ah yes, their numbers are so insignificant that it we shouldn’t bother. Funny how that doesn’t go for homosexuals who are a mere 10% of the population.
Agreed, if your message is not getting through to him, dust the dirt off your sandals, he is not worth your God given Time!!!
It is against the nature and the purpose of man, even according to Darwin. To a Darwinian, a homosexual is a broken branch that contributes nothing to the gene pool and is therefore insignificant. Blowing just as the dust.
Someone needs a hug:hug1:@OP: There is no secular argument against homosexuality. None that stands any water anyway. Here’s an article you should read:
cltampa.com/dailyloaf/archives/2009/11/02/sexually-antagonistic-selection-the-evolution-of-male-homosexuality#.T-3a7ZH4WSo
(Basically (male) homosexuality is a byproduct of female hyperfertility like sicle cell anaemia is a byproduct of better protection against malaria. While some individuals may “suffer”, overall there is a benefit. With sicle cell more survive than without, with homosexuality there is more offspring to the family even with some members not procreating. The non-procreating members also can function as babysitters. Kind of like bees and ants where only the queen procreates.)
snort
telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/5550488/Homosexual-behaviour-widespread-in-animals-according-to-new-study.html
- Nobody claimed that homosexuality is normal aka the norm. Obviously heterosexuality is the norm. Homosexuality however, like heterosexuality, is natural.
- Homosexuality in animals is rare, therefore homosexuality in animals doesn’t exist. Yeah, right.
- It would be nice to see some evidence to his claims (i.e.the difference between humans and animals), unfortunately, not suprisingly though, there is none.
Homosexual anal sex is no more or less risky than heterosexual anal sex. Also, according to this logic you should be fine with female homosexuals then.
That is such a load of …
Procreation argument? Really?
One also can’t separate voluntary infertiles (aka those who use contraception) from fertiles? One can if we know which doctor prescribed contraception to whom. One could also simply outlaw any contraceptives, like Romania in the past.
Children need father and mother? O rly?
newscientist.com/article/dn19014-children-of-lesbian-parents-do-better-than-their-peers.html
newscientist.com/article/dn6670-lesbian-couples-raise-welladjusted-teenagers.html
People are having less children who are better educated, on a planet that is overpopulated, how terrible.
Does this guy think before he puts such tripe down?
P.S.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8772014
:this +1
Homosexuals are nowhere near 10 percent of the population, and the world is not overpopulated.@OP: There is no secular argument against homosexuality. None that stands any water anyway. Here’s an article you should read:
cltampa.com/dailyloaf/archives/2009/11/02/sexually-antagonistic-selection-the-evolution-of-male-homosexuality#.T-3a7ZH4WSo
(Basically (male) homosexuality is a byproduct of female hyperfertility like sicle cell anaemia is a byproduct of better protection against malaria. While some individuals may “suffer”, overall there is a benefit. With sicle cell more survive than without, with homosexuality there is more offspring to the family even with some members not procreating. The non-procreating members also can function as babysitters. Kind of like bees and ants where only the queen procreates.)
snort
telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/5550488/Homosexual-behaviour-widespread-in-animals-according-to-new-study.html
- Nobody claimed that homosexuality is normal aka the norm. Obviously heterosexuality is the norm. Homosexuality however, like heterosexuality, is natural.
- Homosexuality in animals is rare, therefore homosexuality in animals doesn’t exist. Yeah, right.
- It would be nice to see some evidence to his claims (i.e.the difference between humans and animals), unfortunately, not suprisingly though, there is none.
Homosexual anal sex is no more or less risky than heterosexual anal sex. Also, according to this logic you should be fine with female homosexuals then.
That is such a load of …
Procreation argument? Really?
One also can’t separate voluntary infertiles (aka those who use contraception) from fertiles? One can if we know which doctor prescribed contraception to whom. One could also simply outlaw any contraceptives, like Romania in the past.
Children need father and mother? O rly?
newscientist.com/article/dn19014-children-of-lesbian-parents-do-better-than-their-peers.html
newscientist.com/article/dn6670-lesbian-couples-raise-welladjusted-teenagers.html
People are having less children who are better educated, on a planet that is overpopulated, how terrible.
Does this guy think before he puts such tripe down?
P.S.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8772014
Smoking also affects people who aren’t smoking whereas sodomy doesn’t.
Except that HIV has been in human populations for many years. Heterosexual infections far outnumber homosexual infections.