Two things.
First, the company that distributes these things has already made a choice. They are not ignorant of the standards of good taste, decency, nor how it may be offensive to Catholics.
Understood, but there is still a freedom of speech element that must be respected. Yes, its wrong, and yes it is outraging, but for those of us blessed with the truth I think a more appropriate reaction should be sadness for their state, and Christ’s love to win them to the kingdom.
Second, it is fallacy to think it is wrong to NOT seek government intervention in any action if you think it is WRONG. Why don’t I have to right to drive without a seat belt? Why can’t I put sharp fenders on my car if I want? Who is anyone to say I shouldn’t have that right? Examined the other way, who are YOU to say murder is wrong? What if I think it’s perfectly fine? What if 70% think it’s perfectly fine?
Freedom of speech is not the same as relativism in morality. They can say whatever they feel like, print whatever they feel like, and distribute it to whomever they like provided it is not pornographic (in this case, it is so minors should not be allowed to purchase it). They are not, however, allowed to act on hateful bias. They cannot attack catholics, desecrate statues owned by the church, and they cannot muder anyone or physically assault them. They can distribute whatever literature they like, and as anyone knows we can choose not to support it, and ask them
in love to acknowldge that we have a difference in opinion, and they need to keep our faith out of the arguement. The best way to destory an idea isn’t to burn to books, its to get people to not read them. Freedom of speech must be respected.
The point is that there are activists who dislike that anyone criticizes their behavior and makes a moral judgment about it. They run around trying to convince everyone that no one has a right to do that, but they DO have that right. It’s the same right that allows us to call murder wrong and ban it, to call using heroin wrong and ban it (wait - aren’t you discriminating against addicts?

).
Agreed, and they are free to dislike all they want, and say how much they disagree if they want. Just as we are. It’s back to freedom of speech again, which is wholly different from prohibition and murder.
This is the kind of action we see on one hand from a group who, as a whole, is critical of the Catholic church for not embracing their lifestyle. Well who in their right mind CAN when you have behavior like this? **Imagine the outcry there would be if you drove past a Catholic Church one morning and outside there was a giant billboard showing something anti-gay using the same offensive tone this calendar takes? ** How many “oh, it’s just free speech, so be quiet” types do you imagine would show up to support it? Answer: zero, because it wouldn’t be viewed as free speech, but as hate speech.
Yes, there would be an outcry. Lots of people would send “hate mail” to the church, but I can tell you that unless the sign was telling people to physically harm gays, they government would
not interfere. This is actually happening right now, all the time, all over America with Westboro Baptist. They are literally promoting hate in the streets but because they are not infringing on other’s rights their right to free speech is protected by federal government, and should be. In this country, and in all others, freedom of speech should
always be protected.
So, as the saying goes, what’s good for the goose…
As I have pointed out above with Westboro Baptist, it is. Gays are bashing christians, and Christians are bashing them back. I personally think that we need to be the better people, since we represent the almighty and most loving God, and stop hating and love them. Not by accepting their sin, but by not trying to deprive them of their right to free speech.
