Host in album

  • Thread starter Thread starter a83192
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi there,
Wow, lots of answers. 🙂

I would explain to the person (gently, as I assume they don’t know that they did wrong, although I find it odd that someone would just do that in a Church! I mean, they should get the sense that we believe Communion is something special, at least, from the Mass itself…and it’s at the very least just wrong to do that…I wouldn’t walk into another place of worship and wander off with something as a token, but I know I shouldn’t judge here…) that the Host is considered to be very Holy in the Roman Catholic faith (how much you explain is up to you) and that we are not meant to “keep it” and that this is considered very wrong to us. I would say that you wish to take it to a priest. I would wrap it in cloth or tissue (whatever you had available) and bring it to the nearest Roman Catholic Church after explaining what happened.
I would not dissolve it in water. It’s one thing if clergy does that…they know the proper method, but lay people are not instructed to do that. The Church also has a sacrarium, which is a sink that drains directly into the ground, not into the sewer system. We are not to dissolve it in water ourselves, from what I have researched:

holyspiritinteractive.net/columns/williamsaunders/straightanswers/133.asp
ewtn.com/library/liturgy/zlitur177.htm
catholicdoors.com/faq/qu171.htm

I would also not consume it, because you don’t know how old it is I’m assuming, and if it is brittle or unsanitary you don’t want to choke (imagine how awful that would be!) by accident. None of the directives I read said to consume it in this case.

This site said it well:
fisheaters.com/disposing.html
"The Blessed Sacrament

In the sacristy (also called “vestry”) of a church – the room where vestments, vessels and oils are stored – there is a special sink called a “sacrarium” (also “piscina”) which is used for cleaning sacred vessels. This basin’s drainage pipe doesn’t lead to the sewer as do those of most sinks; instead, it goes directly to the earth so that liquid sacramentals, such as Holy Water and oils, or even the tiniest morsels of the Blessed Sacrament or drops of the Precious Blood which might be found on Patens or in Chalices, will be disposed of correctly and with reverence. If the accidents of a consecrated Host or chalice of the Precious Blood were to become contaminated in some way such that it could not be consumed, they are disposed of in the sacrarium.
"

The Church will know the proper, and holiest way, to do this.

I’m sorry, but I still find it rude that someone would walk off with a Host,regardless if they knew what they were doing. Trying hard to bite my tongue here, but I just wonder why they would do that in the first place.

God Bless.
 
This is a serious matter, and yes one must discern what is best to do. But as NEP has stated, and ZAB has elaborated, do the job required to protect the Eucharist and put everything in order afterwards. In other words, consume the host, then go see your pastor and tell exactly what you did, he will be more than happy to “help you set things right”.
One must choose the correct means of protection…that was my point.

And I would imagine in the various possible contingent aspects of an event of this kind…there are various good ways to proceed to choose from in prudence …depending on those contingent aspects.
 
I should hope the statement is that he is. Priest!

🙂
So would I…and I give the benefit of the doubt of course. But ordination does not mean that the person is correct. (I am sure Father knows of Priests whom he disagrees with about one thing or another…)
 
I’ll simply refer you to Canon Law on the exemption to this matter:

Can. 916 A person who is conscious of grave sin is not to celebrate Mass or receive the body of the Lord without previous sacramental confession** unless there is a grave reason and there is no opportunity to confess; in this case the person is to remember the obligation to make an act of perfect contrition which includes the resolution of confessing as soon as possible.**

Whether or not the situation we are faced with meets this exemption, I will leave up to everyone to decide on their own. IMHO, it meets it, especially since as Deacon Lapey has pointed out, the primary intention is proper disposal of a host and not reception of a sacrament.
Yes I am aware of that Canon.

Even if that would be that sort of grave necessity (I leave it to Canon Lawyers and the Magisterium to judge) it does not of course cover the self-reception of the Eucharist by a lay person. Again I could see a real emergency situation like that which happened in times of persecution in the early Church or other like times…but again I note that we ought not to be quick to judge that such is the solution to the described situation. Of course opinions may differ here.

Perhaps someone (yourself or others…) will be able to find other documents etc that can have bearing here.

(PS: please note that my posts up above is not doubting per se your being a Priest…nor is it meant in any disrespect of course!)
 
In any case… the situation certainly needs to be remedied in a way that the Holy Eucharist is removed from such irreverent circumstances.
 
Yit does not of course cover the self-reception of the Eucharist by a lay person.
Its not considered “self reception.” As I pointed out already, if there were left over hosts that needed to be consumed because of a lack of tabernacle, the consumption of those hosts would not be considered “communicating” by any canonical standard.

Or if someone is concerned about receiving it, bring a pyx and put it in it instead and bring it to the parish priest.
 
I would either consume it or bury it in the grounds of a Church.Honestly if I dissolved it in water I would have to drink the water as well as I would do when I clean the pix,in case there are particles left.So honestly,I would choose consuming it immediately .I would rather have the hard time with my relatives than see the Eucharist in a book.God Bless.
 
I would either consume it or bury it in the grounds of a Church.Honestly if I dissolved it in water I would have to drink the water as well as I would do when I clean the pix,in case there are particles left.So honestly,I would choose consuming it immediately .I would rather have the hard time with my relatives than see the Eucharist in a book.God Bless.
If you dissolved it in water, you could pour the water directly into the ground where it does not get walked upon, like a flower bed.
 
what do you do if you are in a situation in which you visit a relative’s house and you are looking through a photo album of a vacation and you find a host in the album.

You ask the relative what it is and you are told that they took the host as a souvenir to remember the trip since they happened to be visiting a Catholic Church during communion time.

What do you do in such a situation? Should you go on your knees and adore the Blessed Sacrament right then and there or what else?
I would explain to the people exactly what that host is say sorry your book is the wrong place to have this Sacred Host I would then consume it whether I offended the people or not, Jesus should not be kept in a book as a memory:shrug:
 
This is a serious matter. In a parish I used to belong to, they were having trouble with mistreatment of the host. They found them used as book-markers in missals in the pews, given to babies, and lying out on the lawn of the church. I even saw a deacon chase down someone who had just received a host from him but did not consume it right away. A few homilies a year would reduce a lot of this.
Reception directly on the tongue would be a deterrent! It was a deterrent for centuries! [edited] —we had supposedly intelligent people in the chain under the Pope who thought the opportunity for desecration wasn’t as important as changing the manner in which the Sacred Host is received. After all these years the practice continues. With extensive proof that blatant desecration occurs, the folly continues: a sort of guaranteed plan for Satan to add to his tally. Amazing! Simply amazing!
 
If you dissolved it in water, you could pour the water directly into the ground where it does not get walked upon, like a flower bed.
Let the Priest at the parish do this. They have a special set up for such…
 
Reception directly on the tongue would be a deterrent! It was a deterrent for centuries! [edited]
In the early centuries…up to the ninth century it was received in the hand standing. But yes…If there is a problem in some place…things need to be done to correct it in that place (the Church in fact agrees). Though I will note that sacrilege can happen too when received on the Tongue.
 
In the early centuries…up to the ninth century it was received in the hand standing. But yes…If there is a problem in some place…things need to be done to correct it in that place (the Church in fact agrees). Though I will note that sacrilege can happen too when received on the Tongue.
You might want to check your dates.
 
You might want to check your dates.
Quote:

"…we know that until the ninth century Communion was received in the hand, standing. That does not of course mean that it should always do so. For what is fine, sublime, about the Church is that she is growing, maturing, understanding the mystery more profoundly. In the that sense the new development that began after the ninth century is quite justified, as an expression of reverence, and is well founded. But, on the other hand, we have to say that the Church could not possibly have been celebrating the Eucharist unworthily for nine hundred years. If we read what the Fathers say, we can see in what a spirit of reverence they received Communion…

We should be concerned only to argue in favor of what the Church’s efforts directed toward, both before and after the ninth century, that is a reverence in the heart, an inner submission before the mysteryof God that puts himself into our hands…"

Cardinal Ratzinger (Pope Benedict now in case some readers do not know…) From “God Is Near Us” Ignatius Press Pg 70 2001

(he of course also would say that if there is an abuse in some place…such needs to be corrected and the Eucharist safeguarded of course.)
 
This post seems to have gotten derailed.

Please tell us when you have done something about this situation! I have been thinking about it all week with concern.

Let us all pray today, since it’s First Friday, in reparation for this sacrilege against Jesus’ love in the Blessed Sacrament.
 
This post seems to have gotten derailed.

Please tell us when you have done something about this situation! I have been thinking about it all week with concern.

Let us all pray today, since it’s First Friday, in reparation for this sacrilege against Jesus’ love in the Blessed Sacrament.
It was a hypothetical question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top