N
NickVA
Guest
I KNOW THAT IT IS FORBIDDEN TO BUY OR SELL A RELIC.
should I contact the dominican order?
should I contact the dominican order?
Firstly what type of relic are you talking about? There are three different classes of relics.I KNOW THAT IT IS FORBIDDEN TO BUY OR SELL A RELIC.
should I contact the dominican order?
I do not believe that at all.Of course, with the rabid desire to modernise the RCC about 50 years ago, a lot of relics were discarded onto the rubbish tips…an incredible betrayal in my humble opinion.
I personally shudder at the thought of having say a fingerbone of St. Lawrence, it seems to me a desecration of the saint. I have no problem with third class relics which can e found in the strangest places. I have a 3rd class relic of St Therese of the Child Jesus found in the leaves of an old catholic book.
I have a sneaking suspicion that he would be somewhat more likely to obtain a relic because, as a priest, the assumption is he would be more aware of the necessity for careful and reverent storage and treatment of it.I know a priest who cares for a vast number of relics. He receives a lot of relics and all he does is write letters to the Orders who would care for such relics. You can try that but its no guarantee that you will be given a relic.
I cannot give documented evidence, I have had friends who rescue dumped Catholic items such as statues, boxes containing such items as relics. The Brisbane Cathedral dumped their relics and were rescued by some of the congregation. Whether or not this was intentional or not I cannot give an answer as I was not a witness, I have seen some of the relics rescued and they are second class relics.I do not believe that at all.
Please cite your documentary evidence for such a claim.
Then you have to very careful about what you say. Maligning the Church is serious.I cannot give documented evidence, I have had friends who rescue dumped Catholic items such as statues, boxes containing such items as relics. The Brisbane Cathedral dumped their relics and were rescued by some of the congregation. Whether or not this was intentional or not I cannot give an answer as I was not a witness, I have seen some of the relics rescued and they are second class relics.
That story is horrifying. Who has the right to say that the relics are inauthentic and burn them all? It wasn’t the bishop was it?I would love to have a relic of dear Blessed John Henry Newman, but he and God had other plans…
When we visited the Oxford Oratory in September, they had a lovely relic chapel – oxfordoratory.org.uk/church-tour_3.php
It was a new collection because the old one had been cremated:
1970s & '80s - Loss
The 1970s and 1980s witnessed the saddest period in the chapel’s history. The cult of relics did not chine with the spirit of the age. Despite Grissell’s fastidiousness in ensuring that all his relics were authenticated by ecclesiastical authorities, the entire collection was declared to be ‘inauthentic’ and was dispatched to the local crematorium. The physical remains of St. Pacificus had survived the Roman persecutions of the church, but did not survive the twentieth-century. The top of the altar still bears the marks of an asiduous ‘recker’ who chiselled out a relic of St. Peter’s altar enshrined there. The other artefacts of Grissell’s collection were dispersed and the sacristry was turned into a public conveniance. The chapel stood empty and Mass was no longer said there. Thankfully, the image of Our Lady of Oxford survived in place above the altar.
newmansociety.blogspot.com/
take care,
amsjj
+++
Jesus, God and man,
imprisoned by love in Thy most holy Sacrament,
have mercy upon us.
– Blessed John Henry Newman, December 22, 1851
(LD, XIV, 511).
Of course, I agree. But I guess it can’t hurt if the OP tries. Even for a priest, there’s no guarantee with writing a letter will grant you guardianship of a relic.I have a sneaking suspicion that he would be somewhat more likely to obtain a relic because, as a priest, the assumption is he would be more aware of the necessity for careful and reverent storage and treatment of it.
I have not maligned the Church, what I said is true, I hope it was not a widespread practice however.Then you have to very careful about what you say. Maligning the Church is serious.
Again you are making wild assertions.I have not maligned the Church, what I said is true, I hope it was not a widespread practice however.
What would you consider proper documentation? I’ve heard these stories as well. Dumped, burned and the ashes scattered ect.Again you are making wild assertions.
You don’t have documentary evidence to back your claim. Saying friends rescued dumped relics is meaningless. Were you with them when they “rescued” the relics? How do you know they didn’t take them.
Assuming they were dumped, who dumped them? How do you know it was the Church? How do you know they were not put out by accident? How do you know they are real relics?
Its all hearsay.What would you consider proper documentation? I’ve heard these stories as well. Dumped, burned and the ashes scattered ect.
He said Parishes not The Church as a whole.Its all hearsay.
Does the Church have a stated policy of “dumping” relics? If they do then how is this evidenced?
I never believe the “I heard”, “they say” “somebody told me” stories.
If that is the extent of a claim then it is better that people keep their mouths shut.