How are beings sustained?

[Lee1]

What is the question?

 

[Wesrock]

See post# 10.

 

[1ke]

You said:

the knowledge of a decision is needed to sustain the individual at the moment he acts.

So I asked you, “who says?”

In other words, where did you get this idea. You haven’t given any reason or proof, just unfounded assertions.

 

[STT]

Which was not what I asked you to prove, so please go back to the previous post and read again.

I said: Because the knowledge of a decision is needed to sustain the individual at the moment he acts.
You said: Why would this need to be true?
And I answered: Because we are not God.

There’s no reason why it couldn’t, but I already explained that in your other topic.

Explained?

 

[STT]

In other words, where did you get this idea. You haven’t given any reason or proof, just unfounded assertions.

That is a part of Catholic belief. God is existence and only He is so. He therefore does not need a creator or sustainer.

 

[1ke]

That is a part of Catholic belief. God is existence and only He is so. He therefore does not need a creator or sustainer.

Your assertion that “knowledge of a decision is needed to sustain the individual at the moment he acts” does not follow from that fact.

Furthermore, God is outside time.

Frankly you are not making any sense.

 

[STT]

Your assertion that “knowledge of a decision is needed to sustain the individual at the moment he acts” does not follow from that fact.

It does. I said that God is existence and only He is so. I put only to stress the fact that we are not existence. It then follows that we are created and need a sustainer.

Furthermore, God is outside time.

I know that. I have a challenge for that as it is expressed in OP.

Frankly you are not making any sense.

What I said will make sense.