M
Mikaele
Guest
How are there no parts to the Holy Trinity if there are 3 distinct Persons?
The God of Judaism is defined as a pure spirit, which I’d guess is kind of an analog entity, existing as a continuum of spirit-stuff. That God has no parts.How are there no parts to the Holy Trinity if there are 3 distinct Persons?
Tony,We know from our own experience even on earth that a person cannot be divided into parts. Either you’re a person or you’re not. The whole point about the three Persons in the Blessed Trinity is that they are perfectly united by love so that they are One Being and distinguishable only by different activities. We cannot hope to explain this mystery fully because it concerns the nature of our Creator, the Supreme Being without Whom nothing would exist. But we do know that the greater the love we have the more we identify ourselves with the persons we love. And conversely it is lack of love which leads to conflict and the greatest atrocities against others…
I have to disagree that Christianity defines God as three distinct entities. It defines God as only one entity, i.e. one being. Person is an expression of nature (the entity or being), not a distinct part.The God of Judaism is defined as a pure spirit, which I’d guess is kind of an analog entity, existing as a continuum of spirit-stuff. That God has no parts.
The God of Christianity is defined as three distinct entities, and therefore has at least three distinct parts. Despite its protestations, Christianity is not a monotheistic belief system.
There is supposedly some particular value in being able to call your religion, “monotheistic,” but I do not see it. I’d appreciate Christianity the more if its practitioners knew how to count better, e.g. 1+1+1=3.
Personally I see no particular value in monotheism, and prefer the notion that the immense labor of universe building and critter design was a group effort. So the evidence implies.
I’d not bother to discuss this, except that you claim to be a Catholic. The Church teaches that there are three Gods, two of them spirits, plus another who took the form of a regular matter/energy based human being who ate material food and presumably disposed of it like other humans, who enjoyed wine, appreciated having his feet washed, bled, suffered physical pain, and died a victim of excruciating torture.God is not material. His nature is spirit, not matter and energy. Spiritual beings cannot be divided into parts. Person is an expression of nature, not a distinct part. (In the same way your own person is not distinct from your nature–you are one human being, not two.)
All you are doing here is dragging words around and placing them wherever they are convenient to your beliefs. You seem to believe that 1+1+1=1. That’s not my fault, and I can’t fix your strange programming with a million logical arguments, because your beliefs are not based upon logic. You should be arguing your beliefs with another religionist, playing the “my prophets are older than yours,” or “my God is better than yours” game.I have to disagree that Christianity defines God as three distinct entities. It defines God as only one entity, i.e. one being. Person is an expression of nature (the entity or being), not a distinct part.
For humans, each distinct entity, each human being, is expressed as one person–again, not a distinct entity from our nature but an expression of our nature. With God, one entity is expressed as three persons.
(If we were counting person and nature as ‘parts’, that would be 4 parts, not 3, but person is not a part.) See F.J. Sheed’s Theology for Beginners, for a more complete discussion of the Trinity.
That characterization of Catholic belief is not correct. Catholics believe the God is one. One non-material (spirit) entity. We don’t claim that in God there are three natures, but that the one nature of God is expressed in three Persons.I’d not bother to discuss this, except that you claim to be a Catholic. The Church teaches that there are three Gods, two of them spirits, plus another who took the form of a regular matter/energy based human being who ate material food and presumably disposed of it like other humans, who enjoyed wine, appreciated having his feet washed, bled, suffered physical pain, and died a victim of excruciating torture.
Carrying a censer for the Stations of the Cross was an emotionally painful experience, because I believed exactly what the Church had taught about the physicality of Christ and his pain, as real as that of the ordinary humans who preceded and followed him on torture racks of human design. Evidently you believe otherwise.
As for the “one human being” malarkey, you might want to study the psychology literature on schizophrenia and multiple personalities, and the Church literature on exorcisms.
Yeah, exactly. I might also add: each Person of God shares the nature of Godhood, of being God. Monotheism. All three Persons in unity with the oneness of …God.John 1:1-2, 14 : In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God.; And the Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us, and we saw his glory, the glory as of the Father’s only Son, full of grace and truth.
Doesn’t get anymore plain than that that the Father and Son are both God. If the Father and Son are both God, but separate persons, why is it a stretch that the Holy Spirit is another person but in unity with God?
It would be easier to explain to a blind man what the sunrise looks like than to explain God in the Holy Trinity. God is infinite and, by definition, cannot be contained in words or our mind.
Its an impossible hypothesis since the Father is NOT the Son and the Son is NOT the Holy Spirit, etc. These three hypostases are distinct from one another make them three parts. The fact that Trinitarian doctrine states that these three persons are also one being does not change the fact that these three are necessarily three parts of one whole.How are there no parts to the Holy Trinity if there are 3 distinct Persons?
They are distinct persons, not distinct entities. “Person” in the philosophical sense, is an expression of one’s nature, not a distinct nature in itself.Its an impossible hypothesis since the Father is NOT the Son and the Son is NOT the Holy Spirit, etc. These three hypostases are distinct from one another make them three parts. The fact that Trinitarian doctrine states that these three persons are also one being does not change the fact that these three are necessarily three parts of one whole.