How Best & How Long to Engage in Apologetics in This Case?

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_phoenix
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

the_phoenix

Guest
For a couple of years now, there’s been a friendly Baptist with whom I’ve exchanged messages on a photography website. Most of the messages have mutually consisted of things like, “I LOVEEEEE your pictureeeeee!” or a simple “I’ll pray for you” when one or the other of us is feeling ill. Once in a while we’d write each other longer polite messages inquiring about each other’s families, weekend plans, or photo-taking excursions.

Very recently, this Baptist has expressed an interest in “sharing about Jesus, since we are both sisters in Christ.” She explained her position as being that of an ex-Catholic who had never been encouraged to read the Bible nor have a Personal Relationship with Christ. She launched into a handful of Bible verses which led to her “getting saved” and described how her parents, while still Catholic, greatly relieved her mind by attending Baptist services and presenting themselves at altar call to confess Jesus with their lips as Lord and Savior.

Here’s the sticky part about my dealing with this woman in particular. We both grew up and lived for many years in Niagara County, New York. I am guessing we both experienced the lukewarm liberalism in Catholic parishes in the same diocese. However, we turned out very differently, the main difference seeming to be that … I had strong parents loyal to the Pope who taught me quite well what the Catholic Church teaches. My mother many years ago had this to say about altar call, “I would never go up for altar call, because that would be like saying that I was still unfulfilled and seeking Jesus, when in reality I already have everything I need for salvation within the Catholic Church.” So how can I avoid seeming holier-than-thou? I did give witness to the fact about my dad wheeling himself at lightning speed in his wheelchair up to receive Communion from a priest at Mass on one memorable and touching occasion, and that being similar to an altar call, but that was before I knew about her parents.

Also, since this Baptist and I have only discussed friendly pleasantries up until now, the minute she started launching Scripture at me with her warning that she was an ex-Catholic who already knew what the Church taught, thank you very much, I responded like this (names replaced by “your husband” and “your son”):
I know that you are a former Catholic who is now a Baptist. Since you have started bringing up your Baptist beliefs to me in e-mail along with Bible verses, I am doing the same with my Catholic beliefs … Fair is fair. 🙂

Also, please know that if you try to convert me to become a Baptist, I will respond by PRAYING THE ROSARY so that you will come home to Rome and return to the Catholic Church, bringing your husband and your son along with you. 🙂
At which point, she claimed she wasn’t trying to convert me, but then plowed right on ahead by continuing to try and convert me! I’ve called her on it, and now she is BLATANTLY trying to convert me. I’ve let her know that tomorrow, Monday, my Rosary intention will therefore be for her conversion.

We’ve just begun exchanging Scripture quotes and interpretations on the topic of salvation and she is already wanting to complicate things by adding more areas of disagreement to the mix all at once rather than addressing them one at a time … which I know enough not to get drawn into a huge mish-mash of topics all at once.

The thing is, if the conversation is already starting out in what I’ve already sensed is going to be a deceitful manner and prejudice against a Church that has been rejected, how long will it be productive for me to continue with a serious discussion of apologetics?

Any suggestions on the best way to proceed from here?

~~ the phoenix
 
I once heard this which might help on how to keep a perspective on this.

Many non-catholics see discussions of the faith in a casual manner in regards to truth. Kinda like when people negotiate salaries, they really don’t mean what they say until they get to a sticking point, in addition to that usually they are kinda flexible on beliefs in order to try and win a discussion.

The difference is Catholics believe that truth exists and is knowable so we come with a different perspective. So while it doesn’t matter too much to a non-catholic if you prove a point wrong on their part, since they don’t hold truth as absolute, Catholics are a fixed point in which they can stage guerilla attacks. Not seeking truth but trying to make enough attacks to prove Catholicism wrong.

Truth is not necessary, just an acceptance that Catholicism is wrong so that you can have substitute. I wouldn’t get offended that the non-catholic seems dishonest or try’s the same attack that you refuted last time you talked. There is no blatant deceit meant, it is just the way beliefs are expressed with Sola Scriptura.

This is hard for many people to ignore and not get frustrated with as usually the non-catholic wont even notice. What you really need to do is get down to basics, such as…

Does truth matter to Christians?
Can we know truth with certainty?
Who determines what is necessary for Salvation? (not us by our own interpretation, but God)
Authority, where does the buck stop.

God Bless
Scylla
 
Dear scylla:

Wow. Thank you for teaching me a new perspective on apologetics that I hadn’t realized before. About how absolutes are negotiable to non-Catholics. That just boggles the mind.

It also Does help me to understand, because I was wondering how such a nice person as this Baptist could apparently totally flip-flop overnight into a seemingly different kind of person which was very surprising to me.

Your list of basics is very good. Well, to MY mind anyways. Authority seems to be the main issue.

The Baptist has already answered your third item, “Who determines what is necessary for Salvation? (not us by our own interpretation, but God)” by pretty much claiming that God’s words and her Baptist interpretation of them is one and the same thing.

I am reading your post as encouragement to continue my e-mail apologetics. Thank you for your view that this is indeed worth proceeding with.

~~ the phoenix
 
Hey Phoenix! Check out this link to John Martignoni’s FREE apologetics Bible studies. He’s got some of the best material out there. Also his 2 Minute Apologetics is available on CD, MP3, and on his site.
Pax tecum,
 
Thank you for the resource, Church Militant,

I of course am open to this information, and if you’re suggesting I look into it, well sure!

As for the Baptist … she’s already suggested that I check out a Protestant resource.

As for whether she would be willing to look into a Catholic resource in exchange for my looking at her Protestant resource, I’m not sure she’d be so inclined.

Hopefully, the Rosary will also help me to overcome what I would otherwise be unable to on my own.

~~ the phoenix
 
I agree, go to the core questions. Why do we believe Christianity, and where did we get those beliefs. If the Catholic Church was corrupted early, why do Baptists accept her listing of the New Testament? And why do Baptists believe key Catholic doctrine such as the nature of the Trinity and the dual natures of Christ united in His Divine Personhood? Those doctrines were only hammered out in Church councils. How did a corrupt Church get such fundamental issues right?

Another issue I like to discuss is why Christ’s Church was without error only for the life of the Apostles (according to their belief). For they do not believe the Church, any Church, continues to teach the faith of the Apostles without error. So Christ’s Church flowered and faded within one generation in that view. Whereas Catholics believe that once the faith was gifted to the Apostles, the Church has taught it without error ever since. Which position makes more sense? That the Holy Spirit could only protect the truth for one generation, or that the Holy Spirit could protect the truth forever?

And you could also ask her where you can read 2nd century Baptists (in theology, not by name) who clearly reject Catholic teaching. And 3rd, and 4th, and 5th, etc. Ask her to show you any Early Church Father who rejects fundamental Catholic teaching.
 
Dear VociMike:

Thank you for adding your good suggestions to the others. It’s very helpful to hear from you. I’d been thinking in general earlier today about the early church fathers, so it’s really nice to see your specifics, especially as it seems you have some experience in dealing with Baptists on an indepth level. Knowing one’s own Faith is definitely easier than knowing how it compares with so many others. 🙂

~~ the phoenix
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top