A
april32010
Guest
what?Do you suppose your great-grandmother was aware of what could happen if she had sex, ie pregnancy?
what?Do you suppose your great-grandmother was aware of what could happen if she had sex, ie pregnancy?
no,it isn’tit is also proven in Freakonomics that abortion reduces crime.
Murder is a much different word from kill. As you know, there are times when killing is sanctioned in human society.THOU SHALT NOT DO MURDER a bit vague for you, is it?
Through medical advances abortions can be made safer than ever, negating the “Temple” argument. Also, “Be fruitful and multiply” was a command given to non-human species.If it was just their own body it wouldn’t be as heinous, it’s the body of another living creature inside them, their bodies are not their own but Temples of the Holy Spirit from a Catholic Christian perspective…" be fruitful & multiply " not be fruitful, satisfying the lust of flesh & then refuse to let life that they began continue…
First Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Corinthians 3:16 Know you not, that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? [17] But if any man violate the temple of God, him shall God destroy. For the temple of God is holy, which you are.
You’re opposing abortion on moral grounds. Does the visual grotesqueness of something affect its morality? No, so it’s irrelevant. This is just a pro-life scare tactic, and it’s offensive.Why are they grotesque? They are grotesque because they were killed violently. However, they are NOT irrelevant. It is a picture of of a life that didn’t get the right to choose what happens to THEIR body.
Regarding the “temple” argument, abortion can be made safer through medical advances. And if you really care about Temple of the Holy Spirit, why don’t I see Catholics on the forefront of veganism, nutritional labeling, tobacco and alcohol prohibition, and public health and safety legislation?Oh ! and what about our bodies being the Temple of the Holy Spirit and if we defile our bodies God will destroy us ?
And what about the words of Jesus, " let the little children come to me, if anyone harms them, let them tie a milestone around their necks and cast it into the depths of the sea " ?
The Holy Spirit most certainly does not compel you to murder babies in their wombs. Abortion is killing a child whom God loves and whose life remains precious to Him. That life does not belong to you.Murder is a much different word from kill. As you know, there are times when killing is sanctioned in human society.
Through medical advances abortions can be made safer than ever, negating the “Temple” argument. Also, “Be fruitful and multiply” was a command given to non-human species.
You’re opposing abortion on moral grounds. Does the visual grotesqueness of something affect its morality? No, so it’s irrelevant. This is just a pro-life scare tactic, and it’s offensive.
As it stands today, fetuses don’t have rights. You might not like it, but that’s just the way it is, and the law is settled on the issue. The 14th Amendment begins, “All persons born in the United States…” Therefore, one has to be born to have rights.
And because the Holy Spirit has compelled me to have compassion for women, my desire not to have them be victims of unwanted pregnancies, the rights of women already alive take precedence over the rights of the unborn.
I just can’t imagine Jesus telling women that they have to suffer from unwanted pregnancy and child-rearing. I just can’t imagine Jesus blocking human rights. Though I can imagine Benedict telling women that they have to suffer…
Regarding the “temple” argument, abortion can be made safer through medical advances. And if you really care about Temple of the Holy Spirit, why don’t I see Catholics on the forefront of veganism, nutritional labeling, tobacco and alcohol prohibition, and public health and safety legislation?
Finally, considering the historical context, it’s doubtful that Jesus was referring to the unborn in this verse.
You’re trying to rationalize murder. You seriously are trying to tell me that murder is a much different word than kill? It may be a different “word”, but it has the same meaning. Killing may be sanctioned in society, but who necessarily says that it’s right to take the life of another?Murder is a much different word from kill. As you know, there are times when killing is sanctioned in human society.
Through medical advances abortions can be made safer than ever, negating the “Temple” argument. Also, “Be fruitful and multiply” was a command given to non-human species.
You’re opposing abortion on moral grounds. Does the visual grotesqueness of something affect its morality? No, so it’s irrelevant. This is just a pro-life scare tactic, and it’s offensive.
As it stands today, fetuses don’t have rights. You might not like it, but that’s just the way it is, and the law is settled on the issue. The 14th Amendment begins, “All persons born in the United States…” Therefore, one has to be born to have rights.
And because the Holy Spirit has compelled me to have compassion for women, my desire not to have them be victims of unwanted pregnancies, the rights of women already alive take precedence over the rights of the unborn.
I just can’t imagine Jesus telling women that they have to suffer from unwanted pregnancy and child-rearing. I just can’t imagine Jesus blocking human rights. Though I can imagine Benedict telling women that they have to suffer…
Regarding the “temple” argument, abortion can be made safer through medical advances. And if you really care about Temple of the Holy Spirit, why don’t I see Catholics on the forefront of veganism, nutritional labeling, tobacco and alcohol prohibition, and public health and safety legislation?
Finally, considering the historical context, it’s doubtful that Jesus was referring to the unborn in this verse.
Nothing in the Bible that call for banning abortion? How about thou shalt not kill?For me, the answer is simple. There are no Bible verses on point that call for banning abortion.
Although there’s the verse that God knew us when we were in the womb, that does not say that we have to ban abortion.
Such a leap in thinking is akin to the leap in thinking that Protestants use to justify Sola Scriptura in 2 Tim. 3:16.
Also, as a Christian I feel compelled to show compassion for my neighbor, that includes women. Because of my compassion, I don’t want women to suffer the brunt of the consequences of an accidental pregnancy. The connection between pregnancy out of wedlock, and poverty, is clear.
It is also a fact that natural resources are being taxed, and it is also proven in Freakonomics that abortion reduces crime. Should we, as Christians, just sit there and let these problems go unfixed? Contrary to popular belief, economics is important to God…the Bible mentions money in several hundred verses, much more than hell.
Women feel victimized by the possibility of accidental pregnancies, because they know they have to bear the brunt of the consequences. This is why polls show that most unmarried women are pro-choice. To deny women the civil right to choose what to do with their own bodies, would victimize them even more.
Yes, the fetus is being killed, and that is tragic. However, accidental pregnancies are most likely the result of sin anyway. What is more tragic is to see women suffering.
Because the Bible says nothing on point, and because I have compassion for women, I am pro-choice.
’Human life is sacred’’ because from its beginning it involves the creative action of God and it remains for ever in a special relationship with the Creator, who is its sole end. God alone is the Lord of life from its beginning until its end: no one can under any circumstance claim for himself the right directly to destroy an innocent human being… The deliberate murder of an innocent person is gravely contrary to the dignity of the human being, to the golden rule, and to the holiness of the Creator. The law forbidding it is universally valid: it obliges each and everyone, always and everywhere… The fifth commandment forbids direct and intentional killing as gravely sinful. The murderer and those who cooperate voluntarily in murder commit a sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance.
There are indeed reasons, one might abort a child if through doing so, one person might live where two would otherwise certainly die, you might avoid orphaning other children etc. - let’s not go down that road though, it is not oversimplification of other people’s moral decisions I seek here.Murder is a much different word from kill. As you know, there are times when killing is sanctioned in human society.
My point was unless you’re deaf, dumb and blind, then you know what might happen if you have sex.what?![]()
Indeed, it’s quite popular in Belgium amongst adults, and soon kids can join in too!Murder is a much different word from kill. As you know, there are times when killing is sanctioned in human society.
Eh? What? Huh?Through medical advances abortions can be made safer than ever, negating the “Temple” argument.
Also, “Be fruitful and multiply” was a command given to non-human species.
Technically, you are right, because murder is defined as the unlawful killing of a person, and since abortion is currently legal, it isn’t murder, but it should be, because I’m sure that it is in God’s eyes.Murder is a much different word from kill. As you know, there are times when killing is sanctioned in human society.
Abortion will never be safe as long as half of those involved die.Through medical advances abortions can be made safer than ever, negating the “Temple” argument.
Also, you don’t know your bibleAlso, “Be fruitful and multiply” was a command given to non-human species.
Gen 1:27-28 said:27 God created mankind in his image; in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.
28 God blessed them and God said to them: Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it. Have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and all the living things that crawl on the earth.
It is relevantYou’re opposing abortion on moral grounds. Does the visual grotesqueness of something affect its morality? No, so it’s irrelevant. This is just a pro-life scare tactic, and it’s offensive.
Maybe not legally on earth, but Christians are to believe that every human life is sacred, and when you kill, you are destroying a sacred creature created by God that was born to fulfill His will. And by killing the child, you are opposing His will.As it stands today, fetuses don’t have rights. You might not like it, but that’s just the way it is, and the law is settled on the issue. The 14th Amendment begins, “All persons born in the United States…” Therefore, one has to be born to have rights.
And then there’s this:And because the Holy Spirit has compelled me to have compassion for women, my desire not to have them be victims of unwanted pregnancies, the rights of women already alive take precedence over the rights of the unborn.
I just can’t imagine Jesus telling women that they have to suffer from unwanted pregnancy and child-rearing. I just can’t imagine Jesus blocking human rights. Though I can imagine Benedict telling women that they have to suffer…
2 Cor 12:7-10 said:7 …Therefore, that I might not become too elated,* a thorn in the flesh was given to me, an angel of Satan, to beat me, to keep me from being too elated.
8 Three times* I begged the Lord about this, that it might leave me,
9 but he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for power is made perfect in weakness.” I will rather boast most gladly of my weaknesses, in order that the power of Christ may dwell with me.
10 Therefore, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and constraints, for the sake of Christ; for when I am weak, then I am strong.
As I said before, as long as someone dies, abortion cannot be considered safe. When something is considered safe, it means that none involved die. When is a medical drug considered safe? When those involved in the trials don’t die. Abortion will never be “safe”.Regarding the “temple” argument, abortion can be made safer through medical advances. And if you really care about Temple of the Holy Spirit, why don’t I see Catholics on the forefront of veganism, nutritional labeling, tobacco and alcohol prohibition, and public health and safety legislation?
This same point would have applied to the victims of the holocaust, the millions killed by communism, and black slaves in the United States in their respective legal environments.As it stands today, fetuses don’t have rights. You might not like it, but that’s just the way it is, and the law is settled on the issue.
Excellent point!This same point would have applied to the victims of the holocaust, the millions killed by communism, and black slaves in the United States in their respective legal environments.
As it happens even ignoring what the current law may be, the moral justification for the holocaust, slavery etc. was “we do not consider them to be human beings”, so I will be requiring some other reason to be convinced that it’s alright.
Respectfully, I think everybody should need reject we do not consider them to be human as moral justification for anything that would otherwise be murder, etc…
But it’s not about the woman, it’s about someone else’s life, a poor, defenceless, innocent child. It’s not about not judging the woman either. We shouldn’t judge any sinner, but that doesn’t mean we should legally permit the sin. Would we permit murder because it’s not our place to judge the sinner?i felt a woman should have a right to choose (in certain situations such as rape or incest). my reasoning was that their sins werent my problem to judge (cast the first stone).
I am also pro-choice, and I am Christian - for the same reasons you discussed. I personally would hope that any woman facing this decision - for what ever reason: rape, incest, health issues of mother or child, age, socio-economic status - would have all the information provided in a supportive, non-biased environment. I hope they choose to have the baby and give it up for adoption if they cannot raise the child themselves. I pray for all people to have the love and support they need in order to get through this life, but the sad fact is, not everybody has this.I am pro choice. I converted to this position when I was 14, when my mother told me her grandmother died of a self-induced, illegal abortion in 1909 when she couldn’t face having a 7th child. I thought this was awful and still do. Because she died, her husband put their youngest two (including my grandfather) in an orphanage for a while; there my grandfather contracted an eye disease that affected his vision for life.
I do support adoption as an alternative to abortion. However, I think abortions should be safe, legal, and rare as women will always seek them.
Most of the non-Catholic and a good number of Catholic Christians I know are pro-choice.Has anyone ever met a pro choice Christian I did recently an episcopal priest when I heard them talk it seemed so strange to hear about how they love christ and the about how they are for abortion rights. The only pro choice people I have ever met where athiest it seemed so strange. Has anyone ever met pro abortion “Christians” before
Abortions made safer than everThrough medical advances abortions can be made safer than ever, negating the “Temple” argument. Also, “Be fruitful and multiply” was a command given to non-human species.
Yeah the Holy Spirit would really do this ? it’s the great adversary of God that has blinded you with your twisted sick thinking…that would be satan and his minions…And because the Holy Spirit has compelled me to have compassion for women, my desire not to have them be victims of unwanted pregnancies, the rights of women already alive take precedence over the rights of the unborn.
Well keep on imagining, because you imagine wrong, Jesus would never agree to the termination of a childs life.I just can’t imagine Jesus telling women that they have to suffer from unwanted pregnancy and child-rearing. I just can’t imagine Jesus blocking human rights. Though I can imagine Benedict telling women that they have to suffer…
Hardly on the same level as murdering children…Regarding the “temple” argument, abortion can be made safer through medical advances. And if you really care about Temple of the Holy Spirit, why don’t I see Catholics on the forefront of veganism, nutritional labeling, tobacco and alcohol prohibition, and public health and safety legislation?
Yes I hope they’re so safe the child is allowed to be born ! I don’t know how anyone supporting abortion isn’t purchasing a one-way ticket to hell for this un-repented sin !I do support adoption as an alternative to abortion. However, I think abortions should be safe, legal, and rare as women will always seek them.
Yes, “kill” is a very different word from “murder”. We kill animals for food. We fight wars–heck, God personally killed his enemies in the OT. Police can shoot suspects if they are in danger of being killed. The Catholic Church killed nonbelievers in the Inquisition.You’re trying to rationalize murder. You seriously are trying to tell me that murder is a much different word than kill? It may be a different “word”, but it has the same meaning. Killing may be sanctioned in society, but who necessarily says that it’s right to take the life of another?
This is a very one-sided view of what abortion really is. I personally know women who have gone through abortion. It was very safe for them, they do not regret it, and their lives are better for it.One final thing: A baby is not a punishment. It isn’t a death sentence for the mother. A pregnancy lasts 9 months and it’s over. I know that the abortion business likes to push that down our throats, but at the end of the day abortion brings in good money, and it isn’t about the women at all. If she really doesn’t want the baby, give it to someone else and everybody wins! … Does your compassion extend to the women who have been left infertile by the act of abortion? Does your compassion extend to the poor woman who died a few months ago from internal bleeding after undergoing an abortion? … Please get off your pro-woman platform. Abortion hurts women. We’re there for them when their world comes crashing down afterwards.
Abortion will never be safe as long as half of those involved die.
Come on, safe for the WOMAN, okay?? Let’s not be so square here.Abortions made safer than ever what kind of twisted logic is this ? oh it’s a bit like asking a person on death row, " errr would you like the needle,the chair, the rope, whichever is safer it’s your choice " ? A CHILD DIES AT THE END OF IT, abortions made safer, OMG !
There are many articles showing that this verse doesn’t just mean to multiply numerically. Here’s one: catholicnewsagency.com/column.php?n=2266Also, you don’t know your bible
Everyone keeps calling abortion murder. Murder murder murder. That’s a very one-sided view of what abortion is.Hardly on the same level as murdering children…
You call yourself Christian seeker…
The Holocaust and slavery argument is not analogous, because in those cases, we are referring to people already born. Again, one must be born to have rights in the USA. Furthermore, from a scientific perspective, a fetus is a parasite. Why? Because the woman’s health is being compromised during pregnancy by the growth of the fetus. Look at any pregnant animal and this is evident. There are studies showing that male babies are weaker at birth because the female body attacks the XY chromosomes as foreign bodies.This same point would have applied to the victims of the holocaust, the millions killed by communism, and black slaves in the United States in their respective legal environments.