J
JesuXPIPassio
Guest
Could someone help shed some light on this for me? I’m very confused on this.
This page from EWTN ewtn.com/expert/answers/catholic_rites_and_churches.htm classifies a Church as being an assembly of the faithful with a hierarchial order. Yet this page on wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Byzantine_Catholic_Church
I really hate using wikipedia as a source, but presuming that the article is true, how can a sui juris Church have no Bishops? Who does the necessary governance? As you all know, there are things done by Bishops that just can’t be done by priests. I’d guess the Russian Catholics could just ask the Congregation for Oriental Churches for assistance when they need it, but I’d imagine it would be extremely impractical for Eastern Europeans to have to contact Western Europeans for every little thing, and the Congregation already has 21 other Churches to worry about, plus concerns with ecumenical talks and dealing with the volatile homeland situations that a gigantic portion of Eastern Catholics have to endure. As I understand it, Byzantine priests need an antimension consecrated by their Bishop to be able to celebrate the Divine Liturgy; to whom are those priests in Churches without Bishops supposed to turn?
Or do those Russian Catholic Churches somehow fall under the jurisdiction of another Church that governs the territory?
Also, since the Russian Catholic Church is supposed to be Sui Juris, under normal circumstances, do their Bishops get appointed by Rome, or would their bishops just need to be selected within their own hierarchy? If the latter case is true, am I right in guessing that Rome simply would need to step in and appoint and consecrate new Bishops as there are no native bishops to do the selection?
This page from EWTN ewtn.com/expert/answers/catholic_rites_and_churches.htm classifies a Church as being an assembly of the faithful with a hierarchial order. Yet this page on wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Byzantine_Catholic_Church
I really hate using wikipedia as a source, but presuming that the article is true, how can a sui juris Church have no Bishops? Who does the necessary governance? As you all know, there are things done by Bishops that just can’t be done by priests. I’d guess the Russian Catholics could just ask the Congregation for Oriental Churches for assistance when they need it, but I’d imagine it would be extremely impractical for Eastern Europeans to have to contact Western Europeans for every little thing, and the Congregation already has 21 other Churches to worry about, plus concerns with ecumenical talks and dealing with the volatile homeland situations that a gigantic portion of Eastern Catholics have to endure. As I understand it, Byzantine priests need an antimension consecrated by their Bishop to be able to celebrate the Divine Liturgy; to whom are those priests in Churches without Bishops supposed to turn?
Or do those Russian Catholic Churches somehow fall under the jurisdiction of another Church that governs the territory?
Also, since the Russian Catholic Church is supposed to be Sui Juris, under normal circumstances, do their Bishops get appointed by Rome, or would their bishops just need to be selected within their own hierarchy? If the latter case is true, am I right in guessing that Rome simply would need to step in and appoint and consecrate new Bishops as there are no native bishops to do the selection?