O
Other_Eric
Guest
Michelle Arnold:
In theory, I have been led to believe, a layman could be elected pope. If such a thing were to happen, this hypothetical man would have to be ordained the Bishop of Rome. However, the only clergymen available to perform this ordination would be other bishops, and as pointed out in Michelle’s post, a bishop cannot ordain another bishop without the permission of the pope. However, in my scenario, there is no pope. It seems, therefore, a layman cannot be made pope because of this technicality. How, then, to resolve this apparent paradox?
).I’m confused. Perhaps someone can explain this to me.A deacon also cannot administer the anointing of the sick or confer confirmation. (A priest can confer confirmation if delegated by his bishop to do so.) Neither priests nor deacons can ordain. Only a bishop can confer ordination to deacons, priests, and bishops, although the bishop must have the permission of the pope to ordain a bishop (source
In theory, I have been led to believe, a layman could be elected pope. If such a thing were to happen, this hypothetical man would have to be ordained the Bishop of Rome. However, the only clergymen available to perform this ordination would be other bishops, and as pointed out in Michelle’s post, a bishop cannot ordain another bishop without the permission of the pope. However, in my scenario, there is no pope. It seems, therefore, a layman cannot be made pope because of this technicality. How, then, to resolve this apparent paradox?