How can blobs of tissue become angels

[Smber2c]

Back when I was in college, I did a semester in Moorhead, MN. There was an abortion clinic across the boarder in Fargo that we used to go pray in front of. The people going in used to always leave with this little green bag and we wanted to know what was in it.
After a while we decided to just send a couple in to ask for information and they got one of the bags. The bag had all types of pamphlets talking about the safty of the procedure, the freedom of life afterward…then lastly there was a booklet of several women telling their story. Every story talked about 2 things: the woman’s life being better after the abortion and the dead blob of tissue being up in heaven or up as a star watching over their mother and blessing her for keeping them from suffering through a life that would have been so painful - waiting until mom can come join them up in peace.

Do people really swallow that? Probably nobody here, but would people honestly argue both sides of this? Claiming they aren’t fully human, but after being killed they become human and sit in heaven waiting for mom to come join them?

I hope this is just abortionist wishful thinking and no people really think that sort of stuff.

 

[bilop]

Angels are pure spirit. No human, born or pre-born can ever become one.

As for the destination of the souls of the unborn, and unbaptized babies, there have been many discussions on this site under the topic of limbo.

There is no definitive Catholic answer. Some believe limbo (the fringe of hell where there is no actual suffering b/c the children committed no actual sin), others think there is an extra-sacramental path the God allows these souls to reach heaven. It has not been revealed to us, so we cannot know.

God Bless

 

[rwoehmke]

It is propaganda and propaganda works when it is used on people who are needy and unknowing. That doesn’t make the propaganda true, just useful and believe me the pro-choice folks will use any straw that is useful, lie or not.

 

[lizaanne]

It is propaganda and propaganda works when it is used on people who are needy and unknowing. That doesn’t make the propaganda true, just useful and believe me the pro-choice folks will use any straw that is useful, lie or not.

Very well said!

~Liza

 

[catherine_m]

Unbelievable that anyone can accept this. But when you’ve done something you desperately want to justify - I suppose you’ll believe anything!

 

[Potato1]

Angels are pure spirit. No human, born or pre-born can ever become one.

As for the destination of the souls of the unborn, and unbaptized babies, there have been many discussions on this site under the topic of limbo.

There is no definitive Catholic answer. Some believe limbo (the fringe of hell where there is no actual suffering b/c the children committed no actual sin), others think there is an extra-sacramental path the God allows these souls to reach heaven. It has not been revealed to us, so we cannot know.

God Bless

If abortions result in this sort of idea that the baby goes to heaven either through a theologically ignorant idea of angels or even as some Catholics believe as you put it “extrasacramentally” then killing of babies is not only ok but in fact a duty to get souls to heaven. Kill them before they can sin. sick and wrong.

 

[pumpkinbeast]

If abortions result in this sort of idea that the baby goes to heaven either through a theologically ignorant idea of angels or even as some Catholics believe as you put it “extrasacramentally” then killing of babies is not only ok but in fact a duty to get souls to heaven. Kill them before they can sin. sick and wrong.

I, and I’m sure many others, disagree with that. Whereas God has NOT revealed what happens to unbaptized children to us, He HAS revealed that it is WRONG to KILL. No one is justifying abortion in saying that the souls of unbaptized children might be saved.

As for the OP’s original question, I can’t believe that the abortionists would use such nonsense as that. Saying that the aborted child waits in heaven for it’s mother is admitting that they are killing a living human being, whereas most pro-choicers I know argue that the baby is not yet alive… so, if it is not alive, and thus is not human, WHY would you say that it can go to heaven??? I think this reveals the true, albiet mostly unconscious, strings of justification that abortionists chase around their minds so they can feel comfortable with what they are doing… They need our prayers even more than the babies they kill and the mothers they hurt.

 

[bilop]

If abortions result in this sort of idea that the baby goes to heaven either through a theologically ignorant idea of angels or even as some Catholics believe as you put it “extrasacramentally” then killing of babies is not only ok but in fact a duty to get souls to heaven. Kill them before they can sin. sick and wrong.

I’m not saying I agree with it, in fact I believe in Limbo, but many others hold this view.

God Bless

 

[CCM08]

Dehumanizition is a common method for making killing easier. It’s futher combine with the notion that what was killed is better off dead anyway. Most people have grown up with a pet that became older and sick beyond our abilities to treat, and the act of putting the pet down, although sad, is in the end an act of mercy. So step one is to get the “mother” to consider the unborn child non-human, step two is to convince her that the child is better off dead. Yes, I’ve had several discussions, debates or whatever you want to call them, with women that had abortions. The one thing all of them had in common was the claim that their childern were better off dead. Of course when confronted with taking that ideology to its logical ends they became very upset, for instance suggesting that since people in Africa are mostly poor we should just kill them so they don’t have to suffer a difficult life. Or that a family going through difficult financial period should kill their children to make things eaiser on themselves.