How can people believe Peter is the rock but still not be Catholic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter catholic1seeks
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Apocrypha (obsecure, hidden books ) are 14 books that originated between the 1st to 3rd century B.C. and are mostley of uncertain authorship. these books were added to the septugant, a Greek translation of the Hebrew bible that was made during that period.
You seem to be repeating yourself, are you saying that the original Greek Septuagint did not contain those books?

If I remember correctly, at least one of those books was found with the dead sea scrolls which was written in Hebrew.
 
When and were did the deutercananocal books first appear in the bible? These books are not found in the Hebrew OT bible. They were written after OT prophecy, oracales, and direct revelation had ceased. And these books were never recognised by the Jews as part of the Hebrew Scriptures. Josephus rejected them as awhole.
Josephus also rejected Jesus as the Messiah.

Also, the Sadducee’s only accepted the Torah, not the prophets in their canon of scripture, which shows that there was not one standard canon accepted in the time of Christ.
 
The Apocrypha (obsecure, hidden books ) are 14 books that originated between the 1st to 3rd century B.C. and are mostley of uncertain authorship. these books were added to the septugant, a Greek translation of the Hebrew bible that was made during that period.
Repeating yourself is not an answer.
Your question to us was when the deuteros first appear in the Bible. Mercygate then asked you to tell us when they first appeared in the Bible.

The quote above was your answer. I am asking you if this is your answer to the question of when the Deuteros first appeared in “The Bible”. - That your answer is that the first Bible they appeared in was the Septuigent.

Can you answer that question?

Actually - In order to not derail this thread I invite you to take a look at These threads:
The Bible is Catholic
Missing Books

Peace
James
 
5pintLutheran,
It is really refreshing to read what you just wrote. We would never ask anyone to dislike their current faith, only to doubt the changes that brought about that faith. And, if they find those changes in error, to look to the truth provided by the Catholic Church and THEN come home to the Catholic Church. There are really wonderful qualities and beliefs and truly spiritual, God fearing people in all faiths in Protestantism. The differences of interpretation, teachings, and lack of authority guiding them to One Truth is the problem. As you can see, there is so much that is not taught about Martin Luther, the changes he made, the other Reformers and the changes they made for any Protestant to know the Truth. It has all been spun from straw to legitimize Protestantism. It was all done so long ago, that people today don’t even question it. Then man in the last 500 years has changed even more until there could be no real recognizable connection to the early Church - the Catholic Church.

“The whole Protestant movement was spearheaded by a man who suffered from deep anxiety and depression? I believe that there should never have been a reformation that resulted in sects breaking away from the Church, but the church at that time needed to be “cleaned up” if you will.”

That is exactly what happened in a nutshell!!! How is it that you finally came to this realization?

“God works in mysterious ways, and maybe the Reformation was the “injection” that the Church needed to bring it back where it needed to be.”

That is a good way of looking at it, I guess. Luther just wanted some reform, not to leave the Church. It just got so out of hand very quickly and the rest is history. It really didn’t take long for the RCC to make the corrections. It is just that the Protestants don’t know that. There was really no need for a Reformation. It is just that after 500 years of eroneous teachings, the Protestants don’t know that either.
"Even though Luther was brilliant in his theology, I just had to wonder if any of it was due to the psychological problems he suffered from. Luther lived an immoral and unprincipled life. In “Table Talks” Luther got drunk one night and told some of his drinking buddies that Jesus must have been an adulterer because even He could not resist temptations of the flesh. He went on to claim that Jesus had an affair with Mary Magdalene, Mary and Martha of Bethany, and the Samaritan woman at the well. In Luther’s own words in a “Spiritual Counseling” letter to Jerome Weimer: “[t]he whole Decalogue must go! … Sin strongly; believe more strongly.” --Arthur Sippo, MD, MPH

Reading this online, it makes you wonder if Martin Luther was really a “Hero” or a drunken manic depressive. Did alcohol influence his theology? Did his psychological disorder have any affect on it? If that’s the case… Then protestantism owes much of it’s theology to a drunkedness and manic depression, and that disturbs me greatly.:dts:
 
"Even though Luther was brilliant in his theology,{snip]
Reading this online, it makes you wonder if Martin Luther was really a “Hero” or a drunken manic depressive. Did alcohol influence his theology? Did his psychological disorder have any affect on it? If that’s the case… Then protestantism owes much of it’s theology to a drunkedness and manic depression, and that disturbs me greatly.:dts:
So why do you identify yourself as Lutheran? You sound AWE fully Catholic to me!👍
 
So why do you identify yourself as Lutheran? You sound AWE fully Catholic to me!👍
Yeah I know. 😊 I’m married to a Catholic and her whole family is Catholic, and I agreed to allow our children (none yet) to be raised Catholic. It would be irresponsible for me not to investigate the Catholic faith when all my inlaws are, as well as my wife.

I come out of a Presbyterian background (raised Pres for 26 years) and after I started dating my wife, I realized the beauty of the mass after I attended a couple of times with her.

It made me realize that Presbyterian worship is kind of like a “sermon sandwich.” A sermon sandwich is called that b/c it’s a sermon sandwiched between 2 hymns :dancing: hehe.

I converted to Lutheranism b/c I saw the beauty of liturgy but wanted to remain Protestant, and conservative at that. Lately, through reading some of the discussions on CA without my “Protestant glasses” on, has made some of my opinions about the Catholic faith change. So here I am, praying for guidance for the Lord to lead me wherever He may take me… Even into the RCC, if it be His will.:signofcross:
 
I have heard some stories here and there, but I know nothing to say I know anything in regards to Luther’s mental state. He did go off the deep end in about every way. He didn’t start off that way, but with his growing “power” and political support, he just changed. I guess the old saying is true, “Not everyone can handle the power they are given with grace.” (Something about handling power, so I just made that one up 😃 )

I am not that sure that Luther was that brilliant in his theology. He never seemed to be any more brilliant than anyone else in his time. It is just that he gained power and influence and everyone just thought he was “awesome”.

I haven’t read too much on Luther, but I was under the impression that early on, he was pretty “normal”. Again, it was later when his influence grew that he started living an immoral and unprincipled life.

“Table Talks” sounds interesting. How would Luther know any such thing about Jesus having affairs? Luther was mortal. He seemed to forget that he was merely mortal and Jesus was divine when he started comparing himself to Jesus.

I don’t believe Martin Luther was a hero. He began a revolt that over the last 500 years, has separated millions of people from Jesus’ One Church and Jesus’ One Truth. He was just a man who declared something. He must have been somewhat evangelical. Today, you see how evangelicals can draw you in. Back then, that must have been intriguing and he sold it very well.

You have to know that it was a combination of everything that he was, manic, alchololic, evangelical, powerful, knowledgable, that influenced everyone around him. I am sure his mental state and his alchololism influenced a lot in his life.

I don’t know, I just trust and believe that with my knowledge of my faith, the fact that Catholocism has NEVER changed over the last 2000 years, even in the face of adversity, continues to teach to this very day, Jesus’ teachings and following Jesus’ Sacred Tradition. It also give me great peace to know that the Catholic Church was the only Church in existance then and that it was baptized Catholics, guided by the Holy Spirit, who wrote the Bible. We knew then, we know now, the Truth.
 
5pint,
There are so may conversion stories out there. I have listened to many myself as to gain a better understanding to what specifically were the things that Protestants found out that made them realize that Catholocism was the True, One, Holy, Apostolic Church. My favorite is Scott Hahn. He is so much fun to listen to. You won’t want to turn his conversion story off. He was a Presbytarian Minister (rising fast in the ranks.) and his story will make you think. He also has several books that go into more depth, doctrine differences, etc… I am sure you will enjoy the read. Anyone else have any suggestions?
 
Yeah I know. 😊 I’m married to a Catholic and her whole family is Catholic, and I agreed to allow our children (none yet) to be raised Catholic. It would be irresponsible for me not to investigate the Catholic faith when all my inlaws are, as well as my wife.

I come out of a Presbyterian background (raised Pres for 26 years) and after I started dating my wife, I realized the beauty of the mass after I attended a couple of times with her.

It made me realize that Presbyterian worship is kind of like a “sermon sandwich.” A sermon sandwich is called that b/c it’s a sermon sandwiched between 2 hymns :dancing: hehe.

I converted to Lutheranism b/c I saw the beauty of liturgy but wanted to remain Protestant, and conservative at that. Lately, through reading some of the discussions on CA without my “Protestant glasses” on, has made some of my opinions about the Catholic faith change. So here I am, praying for guidance for the Lord to lead me wherever He may take me… Even into the RCC, if it be His will.:signofcross:
Whatever Luther’s personal problems/illnesses/struggles may have been, he WAS responding to serious abuses in the Church. And he WAS brilliant. His volatility and instability, his apparent OCD, were human flaws that cascaded into a catastrophe.

It is a classical example of sincere piety taken beyond the bounds of rational constraint. I thank God for “places” like the Lutheran and Episcopal Churches that enable people to climb slowly up the ladder of “catholicity” in small enough steps that they don’t die from altitude sickness on their way to the fullness of the faith.

May God nourish, protect, guide and keep you in your continuing search.
 
Oh my,

I would pay for this!

This is why we all have to make donations every month, even if only $5.00 each month to keep the forums open.

This is too exciting for words. My heart is bursting with Joy and excitment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qui est ce
So why do you identify yourself as Lutheran? You sound AWE fully Catholic to me!
Posted by 5pint Lutheran:
Yeah I know. I’m married to a Catholic and her whole family is Catholic, and I agreed to allow our children (none yet) to be raised Catholic. It would be irresponsible for me not to investigate the Catholic faith when all my inlaws are, as well as my wife.
I come out of a Presbyterian background (raised Pres for 26 years) and after I started dating my wife, I realized the beauty of the mass after I attended a couple of times with her.
It made me realize that Presbyterian worship is kind of like a “sermon sandwich.” A sermon sandwich is called that b/c it’s a sermon sandwiched between 2 hymns hehe.
I converted to Lutheranism b/c I saw the beauty of liturgy but wanted to remain Protestant, and conservative at that. Lately, through reading some of the discussions on CA without my “Protestant glasses” on, has made some of my opinions about the Catholic faith change. So here I am, praying for guidance for the Lord to lead me wherever He may take me… Even into the RCC, if it be His will.
Just keep studying 5pint, with your willingness to follow the truth (Jesus) all the way (Jesus) to the light (the Word of God, Jesus) we will someday be welcoming you home. Your future children will be so blessed to be raised by a unified mom and dad. This studying you are doing is the best birthday present you will ever give them. I am so impressed. You da man!!!

Have you ever heard Lutheranism called “Catholic lite”? We call it Catholic lite becasue it has many of the trappings of the true church but one musn’t feel trapped by the hard teachings of Catholicism.

The hard teachings would be the teachings on confession/reconciliation, the embracing of suffering, the many obligations we have as Catholics, by pain of sin, things like that. Lutheranism is a lighter form of Catholicism because one is not bound by The Church. In other words you decide for yourself if you will confess your sins out loud to another, you decide for yourself if contraception is sinful, you decide for yourself if you will drag yourself out of bed on Sunday morning and go to services. For Catholics, we believe the power to bind and loose the conscience of man rests with the authority of the Church so we may not decide these things for ourselves. Under the pain of sin, we follow the churches teachings.

Does this make sense to you?
 
Posted by 5pintLuteran:
It made me realize that Presbyterian worship is kind of like a “sermon sandwich.” A sermon sandwich is called that b/c it’s a sermon sandwiched between 2 hymns hehe.
This is very funny. I play in the bell choir at the Presbyterian church down the street from the Catholic Church I attend. Honestly, the music is beautiful and my daughter’s best friend is Presbyterian and she first invited my daughter to play in the choir and after a couple of years and an out of state vacation with the Pastor and his wife and several of the other “ringers,” I joined the choir as well. The people are wonderful. Very kind, very loving, down to earth, just great people. And their service is like a sandwhich. Just like 5pint describes here.

The first thing we noticed was the use of two cute little kids dressed like altar servers, and they processed down the aisle and lit the candles. We thought it odd that there were altar servers, but no altar.

The next thing we noticed was that the emphasis of the whole service seemed to be on the music with a short service (which didn’t have anything to do with the Bible verse of the day) sandwhiched in between.

I so wish we could talk to our Presbyterian friends about religion, the way we all talk to each other on this forum. I wish they all had the truth found in Catholicism. It pains my heart that we are not unified in faith and I don’t understand how our seperated brethran can ignore the fact that the divisions in the Body of Christ also must pain Christ (our persisting in a sinful state is not pleasing to Christ, he commanded us to “go and sin no more” for a reason, His body is divided, that hurts) who prayed for unity in His church, on the night before He died.

5pint,

As a former Presbyterian, do you have any suggestion as to how we might broach the subject of the liturgy which is lacking there and which you found to be such a loss that you switched to Lutheranism to gain it?
 
PC Master posted:
Moreover, even if Matthew 16:18 was speaking specifically to Peter about Peter, the context (the rest of the gospels, Paul’s writings, Peter’s own writings) simply doesn’t allow for a hierarchal church to be established, nor for the concept that Christ intended any man to be head over the faithful.
I disagree. Can you tell us what other gospel passage dispels the establishment of a hierarchal church? What passages in either the old or new testament negates the concept that christ intended any man to be head over the faithful?
Do you believe that God placed Noah over the faithful?
Did God place Abraham over the faithful?
What about Moses? Did God place Moses over the faithful?
Was King David over the people in the Kingdom?
Did king David have a primeminister who possessed the authority of the King?
Have you ever told us on this thread how you reconcile Matt 16:18 and Isaiah 22:22 with your personal, private interpretation of the Gospels as a whole?
PC Master posted:
The pope calls himself the “servant of the servants of God”, but I think about Christ’s own example – he washed feet. The apostles argued over who the greatest was, and yet Christ said nothing about Peter? No, it just doesn’t fit. Context, context, context./
It’s like the President coming out for a speech and saying, “my fellow americans.” At the same time he is one of us, even charged to serve us as the president, he is also over us in possession of certain authority that the rest of us don’t have. The president has the authority to nominate Supreme Court Justices for example. He has the authority to declare war, for example. American citizens do not have this authority.

The word vicar means, one serving as a substitute or agent. The Pope is the Vicar of Christ. Christ was, at the same time, servant and King. Why can’t the Pope be both servant and Primeminister?
 
PC Master states:
If Christ intended to build his church on Peter, that doesn’t necessarily put Peter in a position of authority.
PC Master, you are correct. Surprised?

Christ building his church on Peter doesn’t necessarily put Peter in a position of authority.

Christ giving Peter the Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven, and the power to bind and to loose the conscience of mankind, does, very much, and most definitively, give Peter a position of authority.

If I own my car then I have authority to decide who gets into it and where it may be driven, right? If I give my car keys to someone else, then I am giving that person my authority and as long as they have my keys then they have my authority to decide who gets in my car and where it goes, right?

Why is this any different for the Kingdom which is at hand?
 
Oh my,

I would pay for this!

This is why we all have to make donations every month, even if only $5.00 each month to keep the forums open.

This is too exciting for words. My heart is bursting with Joy and excitment.

Just keep studying 5pint, with your willingness to follow the truth (Jesus) all the way (Jesus) to the light (the Word of God, Jesus) we will someday be welcoming you home. Your future children will be so blessed to be raised by a unified mom and dad. This studying you are doing is the best birthday present you will ever give them. I am so impressed. You da man!!!

Have you ever heard Lutheranism called “Catholic lite”? We call it Catholic lite becasue it has many of the trappings of the true church but one musn’t feel trapped by the hard teachings of Catholicism.

The hard teachings would be the teachings on confession/reconciliation, the embracing of suffering, the many obligations we have as Catholics, by pain of sin, things like that. Lutheranism is a lighter form of Catholicism because one is not bound by The Church. In other words you decide for yourself if you will confess your sins out loud to another, you decide for yourself if contraception is sinful, you decide for yourself if you will drag yourself out of bed on Sunday morning and go to services. For Catholics, we believe the power to bind and loose the conscience of man rests with the authority of the Church so we may not decide these things for ourselves. Under the pain of sin, we follow the churches teachings.

Does this make sense to you?
Yes it somewhat does. What’s startling to know is that when I first entered the Lutheran church… I absorbed all it taught, as well as the Liturgy and sacraments (I counted 3, to be exact). I’ve been to private confession before with our pastor, but it lacked the “personal” aspect of confession I thought it would have.
During confession, I walked in and sat waiting for the pastor to get ready, and then he hands me the Lutheran Service Hymnal.
I asked what it was for, and he said that we had to read out of it for confession, which I didn’t like. I thought confession was going to be me pouring out my soul to the pastor, so he could give me comfort in the words of absolution “my son… your sins are forgiven.” It felt very vain, and afterward I still felt the despair I had before I walked in with.

We hold: Baptism, the Holy Eucharist, and confession/absolution, in the LCMS. Even saying all this, the LCMS is bracing itself for another “schism.” On one side, you have people who want a more contemporary service (praise band, casual pastor, etc…) and others, like me, who desire a more traditional service (genuflection, confession/absolution, Holy Eucharist, etc…). I’m thinking really hard about jumping ship with the whole Lutheranism thing.🤷
 
Yes it somewhat does. What’s startling to know is that when I first entered the Lutheran church… I absorbed all it taught, as well as the Liturgy and sacraments (I counted 3, to be exact). I’ve been to private confession before with our pastor, but it lacked the “personal” aspect of confession I thought it would have.
During confession, I walked in and sat waiting for the pastor to get ready, and then he hands me the Lutheran Service Hymnal.
I asked what it was for, and he said that we had to read out of it for confession, which I didn’t like. I thought confession was going to be me pouring out my soul to the pastor, so he could give me comfort in the words of absolution “my son… your sins are forgiven.” It felt very vain, and afterward I still felt the despair I had before I walked in with.

We hold: Baptism, the Holy Eucharist, and confession/absolution, in the LCMS. Even saying all this, the LCMS is bracing itself for another “schism.” On one side, you have people who want a more contemporary service (praise band, casual pastor, etc…) and others, like me, who desire a more traditional service (genuflection, confession/absolution, Holy Eucharist, etc…). I’m thinking really hard about jumping ship with the whole Lutheranism thing.🤷
Do you think you might want to start RCIA to see how catholicism fits?

Peace
James
 
Yes it somewhat does. What’s startling to know is that when I first entered the Lutheran church… I absorbed all it taught, as well as the Liturgy and sacraments (I counted 3, to be exact). I’ve been to private confession before with our pastor, but it lacked the “personal” aspect of confession I thought it would have.
During confession, I walked in and sat waiting for the pastor to get ready, and then he hands me the Lutheran Service Hymnal.
I asked what it was for, and he said that we had to read out of it for confession, which I didn’t like. I thought confession was going to be me pouring out my soul to the pastor, so he could give me comfort in the words of absolution “my son… your sins are forgiven.” It felt very vain, and afterward I still felt the despair I had before I walked in with.

We hold: Baptism, the Holy Eucharist, and confession/absolution, in the LCMS. Even saying all this, the LCMS is bracing itself for another “schism.” On one side, you have people who want a more contemporary service (praise band, casual pastor, etc…) and others, like me, who desire a more traditional service (genuflection, confession/absolution, Holy Eucharist, etc…). I’m thinking really hard about jumping ship with the whole Lutheranism thing.🤷
Are your really that comfortable with the Mary, Papacy, Purgatory issues?

Have you ever heard the clear explanation of the Gospel from a reformed protestant perspective?
 
This is very funny. I play in the bell choir at the Presbyterian church down the street from the Catholic Church I attend. Honestly, the music is beautiful and my daughter’s best friend is Presbyterian and she first invited my daughter to play in the choir and after a couple of years and an out of state vacation with the Pastor and his wife and several of the other “ringers,” I joined the choir as well. The people are wonderful. Very kind, very loving, down to earth, just great people. And their service is like a sandwhich. Just like 5pint describes here.

The first thing we noticed was the use of two cute little kids dressed like altar servers, and they processed down the aisle and lit the candles. We thought it odd that there were altar servers, but no altar.

The next thing we noticed was that the emphasis of the whole service seemed to be on the music with a short service (which didn’t have anything to do with the Bible verse of the day) sandwhiched in between.

I so wish we could talk to our Presbyterian friends about religion, the way we all talk to each other on this forum. I wish they all had the truth found in Catholicism. It pains my heart that we are not unified in faith and I don’t understand how our seperated brethran can ignore the fact that the divisions in the Body of Christ also must pain Christ (our persisting in a sinful state is not pleasing to Christ, he commanded us to “go and sin no more” for a reason, His body is divided, that hurts) who prayed for unity in His church, on the night before He died.

5pint,

As a former Presbyterian, do you have any suggestion as to how we might broach the subject of the liturgy which is lacking there and which you found to be such a loss that you switched to Lutheranism to gain it?
Well, I still have a decent relationship with my parents, unless you talk theology with them. My father is strictly a 5 point Calvinist, which I don’t agree with, which is one of the reasons why I left (I used to be a 5 point Calvinist, then I became a 5 PINT Lutheran, :dancing: lol!).

I try to talk liturgy with my father every now and then, but every time I bring it up, he ends up saying something like: “Vestments, ritual… Where is that in the Bible? You guys act like a bunch of Catholics.” Sooo… As you can see, he’s not very fond of a liturgical service. I make him mad when I tell him that we (as Lutherans) participate in the service (bowing, kneeling, standing, kinda like a Catholic service) instead of the “sit and be lectured” structure of a Presbyterian service.
Everytime I go to church with my parents, I get stir crazy… It feels void of meaning! The sermon is good, of course, in a Calvinist way, but the liturgy (if any!) feels dead to me!

Since joining the Lutheran church, I’ve gained a greater appreciation for worship. But since our synod is bracing itself for another schism, I’m losing faith in it.
 
Whoa! :bigyikes:

What is making this thread popular?
I didn’t know my question would lead to this
many posts!
Neither did I know there would be this many
answers.

If someone could go through all of this and
create a post with a summary of all the answers -
that would be great! :rotfl: - - - like a conclusion:coffeeread: - - -
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top