L
lynnvinc
Guest
While there is debate raging on in the non-scientific community about whether anthropogenic global warming is a reality, popes and bishops have called us to take the prudent course of mitigating it, even if we personally are not convinced it is happening.
I’d like this thread to address sensible ways we can mitigate global warming – reduce our greenhouse gases – and not as a place to discuss whether or not AGW is happening (there are plenty of threads on CAF addressing that).
For starters I’d propose ways in which we can become more energy/ resource conservative/efficient and go on alt energy when feasible. Things like “reduce, reuse, recycle, etc.” My own experience tells me we can reduce substantially without lowering living standards or productivity. My husband and I have done so over the last 22 years, reducing perhaps over 60% of our GHGs from our 1990 levels cost-effectively, while actually increasing our living standards a bit.
Already someone on another thread has informed us that the “check engine” light in our cars may indicate gasoline is not burning efficiently, causing local pollution problems and contributing to AGW. Another person on another blog mentioned how shaking out clothes before putting them in the dryer shortens drying time and reduced energy use. There are a myriad of sensible solutions that if practiced wide-scale could make some difference. It is not necessary to do everything, only the things that suit the personal situation of the person, including their recreations (which we all need to avoid going berzerk).
Also, I think many solutions not only reduce GHG emissions, but reduce other environmental pollutants and problems (such as non-renewable resource depletion), and many save money – so it becomes a win-win-win-win situation.
There are also “downsides” to many solutions, so it is good to try and figure out if on balance they do more good than harm, or if there could be solutions to the problems the solutions raise.
BTW, I am against food-to-fuel biofuels, Cap & Trade (mainly bec it would be ineffective), and many ill-conceived geo-engineering schemes. I’m not opposed to larger GHG reduction schemes in general, but tend to prefer volunatry personal/family measures, which in the final analysis will be the main way we solve this problem, if we decide to solve it.
On a final note, I think it is within Catholicism to live a more simple, detached life, focused more fully on God, than on not-God things. As a lay Carmelite (OCDS), this is a position dear to my heart – even though my life is cluttered with not-God things, and I have a long way to go on my spiritual journey.
Bless you for any suggestions or debate over various solutions.
I’d like this thread to address sensible ways we can mitigate global warming – reduce our greenhouse gases – and not as a place to discuss whether or not AGW is happening (there are plenty of threads on CAF addressing that).
For starters I’d propose ways in which we can become more energy/ resource conservative/efficient and go on alt energy when feasible. Things like “reduce, reuse, recycle, etc.” My own experience tells me we can reduce substantially without lowering living standards or productivity. My husband and I have done so over the last 22 years, reducing perhaps over 60% of our GHGs from our 1990 levels cost-effectively, while actually increasing our living standards a bit.
Already someone on another thread has informed us that the “check engine” light in our cars may indicate gasoline is not burning efficiently, causing local pollution problems and contributing to AGW. Another person on another blog mentioned how shaking out clothes before putting them in the dryer shortens drying time and reduced energy use. There are a myriad of sensible solutions that if practiced wide-scale could make some difference. It is not necessary to do everything, only the things that suit the personal situation of the person, including their recreations (which we all need to avoid going berzerk).
Also, I think many solutions not only reduce GHG emissions, but reduce other environmental pollutants and problems (such as non-renewable resource depletion), and many save money – so it becomes a win-win-win-win situation.
There are also “downsides” to many solutions, so it is good to try and figure out if on balance they do more good than harm, or if there could be solutions to the problems the solutions raise.
BTW, I am against food-to-fuel biofuels, Cap & Trade (mainly bec it would be ineffective), and many ill-conceived geo-engineering schemes. I’m not opposed to larger GHG reduction schemes in general, but tend to prefer volunatry personal/family measures, which in the final analysis will be the main way we solve this problem, if we decide to solve it.
On a final note, I think it is within Catholicism to live a more simple, detached life, focused more fully on God, than on not-God things. As a lay Carmelite (OCDS), this is a position dear to my heart – even though my life is cluttered with not-God things, and I have a long way to go on my spiritual journey.
Bless you for any suggestions or debate over various solutions.