P
PeteZaHut
Guest
How could God allow slavery in the Old Testament?
He didn’t IMO that was another reason for the ban. Joshua failed to enforce it The consequence was an enemy population within the tribes that had to be denied freedom.How could God allow slavery in the Old Testament?
It could be similar to the case of divorce.I still don’t understand how God could say “be good to your slaves” - isn’t this condoning slavery? isn’t he bending morals to fit the customs of the times? just because there were slaves back then doesn’t mean it was right. isn’t this moral relativity?
With their hardness of heart, demanding this level of perfection would have caused more harm than good. The same condition likely applied to slavery."Moses permitted him to write a bill of divorce and dismiss her."5 But Jesus told them, "Because of the hardness of your hearts he wrote you this commandment. (Mark (NAB) 10)
Does this imply we are less hard-hearted today back then since slavery is not accepted now?It could be similar to the case of divorce.
With their hardness of heart, demanding this level of perfection would have caused more harm than good. The same condition likely applied to slavery.
We don’t know. It’s not the case that God allowed it to bring some greater good. The same question could be asked today…why does God allow people to commit abortion?How could God allow slavery in the Old Testament?
What good did God bring from slavery? Where in Scripture is this good referenced? Thanks.God allows evil to bring a greater good out of it.
Well if God didn’t allow it, why did it exist? Even the New Testament doesn’t teach against slavery.He didn’t IMO that was another reason for the ban. Joshua failed to enforce it The consequence was an enemy population within the tribes that had to be denied freedom.
No, minimum-wage earners can quite and find a new job. They would not be hunted down and imprisoned, tortured, or returned to slavery if they left their job.Why not? People today have a knee-jerk reaction to the word slavery because it carries deeply racial connotations. But isn’t the slavery of the OT really just a cleaning lady or a butler who are guaranteed room and board? Don’t minimum-wage earners today have it actually far worse off?
“Social arrangement”?! Wow, if I were a slave, I’d certainly balk at that downplay of the total enslavement of one man by another!Slavery is a social arrangement. It’s not intrinsically evil. What’s immoral is treating people as if they were not people. It’s in the catechism.
Where in the Catechism? Thanks!Slavery is a social arrangement. It’s not intrinsically evil. What’s immoral is treating people as if they were not people. It’s in the catechism.
So are you saying slavery is ok according to Catholic Church teaching or not?Slavery is a social arrangement. It’s not intrinsically evil. What’s immoral is treating people as if they were not people. It’s in the catechism.
The word slave is too broad to think of it in black and white terms. Sometimes it means something that is sinfull and other times it means something that isn’t. Depends on whether or not the state being described abuses the dignity of the person. In the past it was a way to pay a debt or deal with an enemy population. Both of those states preserved life in that the alternatives were much worse. PeaceSo are you saying slavery is ok according to Catholic Church teaching or not?