Your condescent is not taken kindly nor is it accurate. You are well aware that Mary is the mother of God made incarnate. Jesus Christ our savior. She is not the mother of God the creator or God the sanctifier. Can you prove that to be untrue? I think not…
What “exactly” is Mary than? The Word became Flesh…and that Flesh was Marys Human Nature combined with Gods Divine Nature …called the Hypostatic Union. Thus Jesus Christ.
The Trinity is ONE PERSON not three which existed from before Jesus Christs birth as per scripture Right? So Christ dies on the Cross now the Human Nature enters into the equation of the Trinity…Right? So since in Luke, Mary is the MOTHER OF THE LORD who “is” GOD. And the Trinity is "ONE not three which only Christ shares a bond with Mary. Well you tell me how Mary is Not the Mother of God the Father? Because it seems we have a fundemantal issue here.
So first question is if Mary indeed conceived Jesus Christ with Sin, then the Trinity now has Sin? Without a doubt, and Christs purpose…“well Gods plan for mankind” would have been in vain. I don’t believe God made the same Adam and Eve error do you? I’m positive he conceived this plan shortly after Eve, and the plan was Jesus and Mary.
If Mary conceived with a nature of Sin what is the purpose of Jesus Christ on the Cross to redeem? Its a contradiction which cannot be true. It cannot nor ever was possible for God to Sin which are the very commandments he told YOU not to do. Are you thus saying God is a Hypocrite? So how could God be born into sin? Seems we are forgetting the Ark of the OT. Mary would be the Ark of the NT which cannot be in a state of Sin. Sorry but theory is lacking in theology and thought of from a pure human aspect without the spiritual aspect taking into consideration at all.
The baby Mary gave birth to was both fully God and fully man. The necessity of affirming this often misunderstood term is to protect the full deity and unified person of Christ. He was not a human that God made and then was indwelt by God’s Spirit, but Jesus was God from His conception, and thus was God when He was born.
It can be said that Mary gave birth to God because the deity and humanity of Christ were metaphysically unified, and thus the God-man was born out of Mary’s womb. The hypostatic union. Fully Divine, Fully Human.
It must be understood that the terms “Father” and “Son” in contradistinction to one another are first introduced in scripture in the context of the incarnation. Christ is God manifest in the flesh. He is fully God and fully man. He had a human body and a human mind, but the humanity of Christ was God’s humanity. God did not merely assume the form of man. He actually became man. He was born of a woman in space and time. Inserting at this point the concept of one person of the Trinity became man is an anachronism in that it argues back from the Greek philosophy of the Church Father’s to the scriptures. The scriptures never introduce the concept of the Trinity. The Trinity is read back into scriptures. And God could NOT be born of Sin.
Therefore, when in scripture Jesus refers to His Father, he is referring to God in his transcendence. When the scriptures speak of the Son, they are referring to God manifest in the flesh. We must believe that the Father refers to the One God of scripture in the same way that the Holy Spirit refers to the Spirit of the One God. Any backward interpretation of these words is to do injustice to the radical monotheism of Scripture and is the result of faulty hermeneutics.
Peace.
