S
steve_b
Guest
various Eastern Orthodox came back into union with the chair of Peter. They are the Eastern rite Catholics. Those who chose to stay in schism, that’s on THEM.You know Steve, the CC still has the Log of the Schism with the East. We are really not in very good position to be judging others and finding them wanting, since the Schism predated the Protestant Reformation by about 500 years.
g:
How long has disunity been around? If we don’t tell people the truth, how are they to know it? If we are squishy on the truth how is that going to attract them? I would suggest THAT enables disunity to continue.Steve your attitude is not one that attracts others to unity.
g:
And as I previously said,I am relieved that it is not up to you to get to decide who qualifies!
818 “However, one cannot charge with the sin of the separation those who at present are born into these communities [that resulted from such separation] and in them are brought up in the faith of Christ, and the Catholic Church accepts them with respect and affection as brothers. . . . All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church.”
Actually, it covers all those who have been born and raised in ecclesial communities that are brothers in Christ, joined to us by baptism and faith.
Complete innocent ignorance can be a safety blanket for those who are in it. HOWEVER, that’s not meant to be a permanent safety blanket. As the CCC points out
[846 (Catechism of the Catholic Church - Paragraph # 846) “… Hence they could not be saved who, **knowing **that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.”
Re: ignorance. i.e. lack of knowledge. Ignorance does NOT always remain innocent
[1791 (Catechism of the Catholic Church - Paragraph # 1791) “ignorance can often be imputed to personal responsibility. This is the case when a man “takes little trouble to find out what is true and good, or when conscience is by degrees almost blinded through the habit of committing sin.” In such cases, the person is culpable for the evil he commits.”
Do you see the point being made? And how are they to be educated in the truth if one won’t tell them the truth?
Once they are given the truth, their ignorance is no longer innocent. They are then guilty, in this case, of schism and heresy etc etc whichever the case, if they don’t act to correct what they WERE ignorant of.
And in all charity, we are NOT being charitable to anyone by allowing them to stay in ignorance when we can share with them the knowledge they need to have.
g:
You are coming across as demanding and somewhat condescending. How do you expect this approach to bear any good fruit?
- Galatians 5:19-21 . The Greek word διχοστασίαςdichostasia= division / dissension / factions /sedition. It’s the same word used Rom 16:17. Do you see the consequences for that sin if one remains in it (Gal 5:21) ? Do you see any expiration date to those warnings or the consequences? I sure don’t
I was talking about those who are “in” the Church vs those who aren’tThe visible Church, perhaps, but none of us can read the heart but God, and only He knows those who are His. You keep insisting on this point which is opposite to what your Catechism states. There is only one Church, and all who are members of Christ are members of His One Body.
.
Can a protestant walk off the street and go to confession in a Catholic Church? If they are “in” the Church they can do that…right? What’s the Church say about that?
· http://www.catholic.com/quickquesti...ed-on-the-lord-may-i-confess-my-sins-to-a-pri
iow they are not “in” the Church.
g:
As St James said (paraphrased)And as far as “protestant Catholics”, I think there are probably more of them than there are non-denoms. They are also called nominal Catholics or cafeteria Catholics. They protest the Teachings of the Church, defy the Code of Canon Law and yet, still lcain they are Catholic.
Don’t tell me who you are, show me by your actions.
If one stays a protestant, they are protestant NOT Catholic. They want to be Catholic? Then come into the Church and remain there.
g:
Then in return, I’m not sure what your goal is de emphasizing truth. What personal needs are you trying to meet , I’m not sure what it is.I am not sure what your goal is by continually emphasizing division. You seem to have a personal need to get met - not sure what it is.