H
Herculees
Guest
Not all diocese’s permit intinction!
i.e. The Archdiocese of Boston does not permit it!
i.e. The Archdiocese of Boston does not permit it!
Probably… still maintaining use of leavened bread at that.How would CITH work in the Byzantine Rite? Administering the Body only?
Page 4 would indicate otherwise?Not all diocese’s permit intinction!
i.e. The Archdiocese of Boston does not permit it!
Not the same thing, but the last sentence reminded me of one of my all-time favorite SF short stories. “The Cold Equations” by Tom Godwin.This can totally overwhelm even the best health care system. Cold hard, heartless math.
In response to many questions and concerns from Parishioners: world experts in immunology state that the risk of contagion is certainly no greater receiving Holy Communion on the tongue than in the hand.
Contrary to some opinion, scientific, medical, and practical experience demonstrate that Communion on the tongue is safer, and more hygienic, than receiving in the hand (which has touched multiple surfaces, and caries much bacteria). It is almost unavoidable to touch the Communicant’s hand when putting the Host into a hand, whereas, properly ministered, there is no contact between the tongue and a Priest’s finger when giving Communion on the tongue.
The Church’s Canon Law is specific that Communion on the tongue is the universal norm, and that Communicants can never be denied their choice to receive kneeling and on the tongue, which is the most hygienic and safest means of receiving Our Lord.
They don’t cite specific “world experts”. The fact is that one of the main vectors for transmission is aerosolized particles which originate in the mouth and nose. This would suggest that in fact saliva is especially risky.You can find the newsletter here dated 15th March.
All I can say is, in over thirty years of being an EMHC, I have received saliva or warm breath on my fingers when distributing on the tongue several times but I have never received it when distributing in the hand.There is really no evidence that Communion on the Tongue is more dangerous. Father Z explains it here.
And the Diocease of Portland asked two doctors, one an immunologist, who also said there is no difference. Let’s face it, COTT bans are not a rational but rather a reactionary measure.
Yes but the principle vector for spread of the virus is through aerosolized particles coming from the nose and mouth. Why do you think people are wearing face masks?And people’s hands are generally rather dirty unless they have just washed them. By Communion time, even if they washed their hands just before Mass (unlikely), a person would have touched the pew, missal/hymn book, money for the collection…