The point is Baptists did not convene a general assembly to form or condone the KKK. Baptists are not an organization like the CC.
I fail to see how that makes a difference in what they did. But they did condone the KKK if not all at once then in separate actions. In a way that makes it even worse because Baptists can’t lay the blame at the feet of one man but distribute it over the entire denomination. Suffice to say the Klan was thoroughly Baptist organization by membership and by leadership.
So you’re telling me the church has not ever done anything wrong or made any mistakes? I do not hate the church I disagree with its man made rules and man made doctrines. That’s why we can discuss them here so we both can educate ourselves
What is it with you protestants? Do you not know the difference between impeccability and infallibility? The promise that Christ made to his church was that it would never teach error. He did not say that its members would not sin nor did He say that church people will never do anything wrong. After all the very first pope selected by Christ Himself denied Jesus three times. By the way the church is sinless. People commit sins. Sins are personable Churches, countries, denominations, groups, etc. cannot commit sin. The people in them can and do.
Now about those alleged man made rules. Who said they were man made? Can you imagine some Jew saying that to Moses? Can you imagine some first century christian telling that to an Apostle? Read the books of Acts and ask yourself this question, Did the early church have authority? Did they have authority to replace Judas? Did they have authority to create deacons, Did they have authority to ordain Priests [presbuteros] or Bishops [Episcopoi]? Did they, in Acts 15, have authority to dictate to the Church in Antioch what they should do without referring to scripture but claiming a direct revelation from the Holy Spirit? The answer is a unqualified yes. The church had authority. Now was that authority passed down when the Apostles died? Again the scriptures say yes. Matthias replaced Judas. Now does your church have authority? Does your church claim to have authority? The Catholic Church has authority. We have it because our bishops stand in a direct line of succession going back to one of the Apostles. Go to any Catholic diocese in the world [Orthodox and Coptic also] and ask to see their line of succession and they will show it to you. Can your denomination do that? Is that important? The early church thought so. Note the words of Irenaeus in the second century:
“It is possible, then, for everyone in every church, who may wish to know the truth, to contemplate the tradition of the apostles which has been made known to us throughout the whole world. And we are in a position to enumerate those who were instituted bishops by the apostles and their successors down to our own times, men who neither knew nor taught anything like what these heretics rave about” (Against Heresies 3:3:1 [A.D. 189]).
He would also write:
“*t is incumbent to obey the presbyters who are in the Church—those who, as I have shown, possess the succession from the apostles; those who, together with the succession of the episcopate, have received the infallible charism of truth, according to the good pleasure of the Father. But [it is also incumbent] to hold in suspicion others who depart from the primitive succession, and assemble themselves together in any place whatsoever, either as heretics of perverse minds, or as schismatics puffed up and self-pleasing, or again as hypocrites, acting thus for the sake of lucre and vainglory. For all these have fallen from the truth” (ibid., 4:26:2).
For Irenaeus, a second century christian, your denomination would be considered to be heretical because you have departed from the line of succession.*