How do I convince an Atheist that God exists?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holly3278
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, you think you have a substantial hold on truth, but a lasting serenity still doesn’t come with it.

Anger, impatience, rudeness. The truth should bring utter serenity. Something doesn’t quite fit well.
 
Charity is an irrelevant issue here. We’re discussing truth claims, and I am affording Charlemagne’s ridiculously contrived conclusion the derision that it deserves. Particularly In the context of the thread subject, it’s a hopelessly misplaced argument.

What have I got to be humble about, in this specific issue?

As for “what’s missing in [me]” - I guess the answer to that is “tolerance of bad arguments and misleading conclusions.”
Charity is not at all an irrelevant issue when voicing opinions which disagree with one another. Not only is it an essential requirement per the Forum’s rules, but it relates to civility in any discussion or debate.
 
You’ve got it completely the wrong way round. It is YOU, the theist, making the positive claim that God exists. The atheist, by definition, merely disbelieves this claim because it comes with no supporting evidence. To demand that atheists prove the non-existence of God not only demands the proving of a negative (you got that bit right, at least), and not only fails to understand what atheism (at least, dictionary atheism) is, but also completely ignores where the burden of proof lies.

Can you prove that Zeus doesn’t exist? I doubt it, but I also suspect you don’t believe in Zeus. Can you tell me why not?
Since no other holy book in the amount of evidence for their god or gods can hold a candle to the to Holy Bible in the amount of evidence for the God of “Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob,” and since the Bible says that only one God exists, then by default the gods of Zeus, Krishna, Thor, etc., do not exist, and cannot exist.
 
Since no other holy book in the amount of evidence for their god or gods can hold a candle to the to Holy Bible in the amount of evidence for the God of “Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob,” and since the Bible says that only one God exists, then by default the gods of Zeus, Krishna, Thor, etc., do not exist, and cannot exist.
I think that there are better arguments for God’s existence than this. A lot of atheists tend to take this proposition as a circular argument.

-Prophesy
 
I think that there are better arguments for God’s existence than this. A lot of atheists tend to take this proposition as a circular argument.

-Prophesy
I too take it as a circular argument. And I am a Catholic.
 
WOW! that’s a tall order.

IMHO I don’t believe you can change anyone. I think you could drive yourself crazy trying.

Lots of prayer for this person.
 
Theistic Evolution:
Evolution proceeds smoothly as divinely established by God to be a system that can self-propagate.
So God is not the loving Father who intervenes to create souls, heal the sick, give us the grace to resist temptation,to be present in the Holy Eucharist and other Sacraments, communicate with the saints, inspire poets, artists and musicians, answer our prayers, console the afflicted, prevent accidents and disasters, preserve life from extinction and ensure that development occurs in the face of overwhelming odds…
 
WOW! that’s a tall order.

IMHO I don’t believe you can change anyone. I think you could drive yourself crazy trying.

Lots of prayer for this person.
So true. I know of at least one person on this forum who was an atheist (not just agnostic!) who is now a full believer and devout Catholic. We should get him to tell us what did it for him. He must be one in a million though.
 
How do I convince an Atheist that God exists?

You begin the long and arduous process by persuading him to ask himself is he really wants God to exist. If he says He would like to believe God exists, then ask him what it would take to persuade him.

A miracle?

Why a miracle, when he would simply explain the miracle away as something natural that could not be explained at the present time.

Etc. Etc.

You see, he really doesn’t want to believe in God, so why bother to try to persuade him?

I have come to the conclusion that only the atheist can persuade himself that God exists.

A tall order indeed! 😃
 
Atheism, as it is usually defined is a “lack of belief”. It therefore follows that it is also a lack of knowledge. To “know something” in philosophy or to have “knowledge of” an object, in this case God, from an epistemological foundation, is to have a “justified, true, belief.”

One can deduce that Atheists do not have “knowledge” of God which implies that they lack justification and validation, since the only lacking implied in the definition of “atheism” is belief.

So they lack knowledge about God. The goal of the theist then logically would be to provide them with a “justified, true, belief”, or in other words, knowledge.

So in response to the question posed in this thread, “How do I convince an Atheist that God exists?” The answer: educate them.

Atheism is merely ignorance. The challenge for the theist is to not appear condescending, or injure the person’s pride, when attempting to educate someone about an obvious truth.

Keep in mind that Catholics have much more intellectual ammunition at their disposal. 2,000 years of thought. As opposed to “Atheism” which only really has since the enlightenment, maybe 300 years. We also have the gregorian calendar going for us. Which is universally accepted. The world has unknowingly decided to use the birth of Jesus Christ as a measure of the beginning of time. 😃
 
How do I convince an Atheist that God exists?

You begin the long and arduous process by persuading him to ask himself is he really wants God to exist. If he says He would like to believe God exists, then ask him what it would take to persuade him.

A miracle?

Why a miracle, when he would simply explain the miracle away as something natural that could not be explained at the present time.

Etc. Etc.

You see, he really doesn’t want to believe in God, so why bother to try to persuade him?

I have come to the conclusion that only the atheist can persuade himself that God exists.

A tall order indeed! 😃
Yes that’s what I think, only an atheist can persuade themselves. and yes i would ask for a miracle. if my dog came back to life there is no way for science to explain that since she’s been dead for months. so if i heard a noise at the door and there she was, scratching at the door to come in, i think i would attribute that to a higher power
 
Atheism, as it is usually defined is a “lack of belief”. It therefore follows that it is also a lack of knowledge. To “know something” in philosophy or to have “knowledge of” an object, in this case God, from an epistemological foundation, is to have a “justified, true, belief.”

One can deduce that Atheists do not have “knowledge” of God which implies that they lack justification and validation, since the only lacking implied in the definition of “atheism” is belief.

So they lack knowledge about God. The goal of the theist then logically would be to provide them with a “justified, true, belief”, or in other words, knowledge.

So in response to the question posed in this thread, “How do I convince an Atheist that God exists?” The answer: educate them.

Atheism is merely ignorance. The challenge for the theist is to not appear condescending, or injure the person’s pride, when attempting to educate someone about an obvious truth.

Keep in mind that Catholics have much more intellectual ammunition at their disposal. 2,000 years of thought. As opposed to “Atheism” which only really has since the enlightenment, maybe 300 years. We also have the gregorian calendar going for us. Which is universally accepted. The world has unknowingly decided to use the birth of Jesus Christ as a measure of the beginning of time. 😃
I don’t see how atheism is only 300 years old. Surely there have always been people who don’t believe in deities! (I say god/gods is a human invention!) Maybe they just didn’t write about it bc they would have been persecuted or shunned or something. then again, science wasn’t as advanced then either, so maybe you’re right, maybe all people really did feel the need for religion to fill the gap in knowledge.
Tell me more about this atheism is ignorance thing. For instance, say there is an isolated society out on some island or deep in the rain forest. For all we know, (or for the sake of argument) that society has not invented the concept of God. Would that be considered being ignorant/lacking knowledge? They would not be rejecting anything, they just never had the idea put in their head before. What’s your take on that?
 
Yes that’s what I think, only an atheist can persuade themselves. and yes i would ask for a miracle. if my dog came back to life there is no way for science to explain that since she’s been dead for months. so if i heard a noise at the door and there she was, scratching at the door to come in, i think i would attribute that to a higher power
Unless of course you happen to have one of those spooky pet cemeteries in the woods behind your house.
 
Unless of course you happen to have one of those spooky pet cemeteries in the woods behind your house.
ah yes but they sent her body to a pathologist a few states away to determine her cause of death so she wouldve had a pretty miraculous journey to get here! 😉 Plus I think they cremated her!
 
samiam

**Yes that’s what I think, only an atheist can persuade themselves. and yes i would ask for a miracle. if my dog came back to life there is no way for science to explain that since she’s been dead for months. so if i heard a noise at the door and there she was, scratching at the door to come in, i think i would attribute that to a higher power **

That’s your idea of a miracle? 😃

Well, the apostles saw Jesus come back to life and appear among them and speak to them and console them. That was enough for them to become advocates and martyrs for Jesus. So your example is well taken … even if a dog only. But why not ask for a dead relative instead? :confused:

And if your dead relative didn’t come back, would that be proof to you that God does **not **exist?
 
samiam

**Yes that’s what I think, only an atheist can persuade themselves. and yes i would ask for a miracle. if my dog came back to life there is no way for science to explain that since she’s been dead for months. so if i heard a noise at the door and there she was, scratching at the door to come in, i think i would attribute that to a higher power **

That’s your idea of a miracle? 😃

Well, the apostles saw Jesus come back to life and appear among them and speak to them and console them. That was enough for them to become advocates and martyrs for Jesus. So your example is well taken … even if a dog only. But why not ask for a dead relative instead? :confused:

And if your dead relative didn’t come back, would that be proof to you that God does **not **exist?
i deleted that post but since you guys responded first i guess that was pointless. just in one of those moods today :sad_yes: i loved my dog more than anything in the whole world even my relatives (well actually I’ve only had one relative die anyway, she was very old and sick and we weren’t that close)
If a dead relative (or my dog) did not come back, it would not prove to me that God does not exist, no. I don’t think you can prove a negative really.
 
I’m an atheist. I read maybe half of the posts in response to the original question. I can tell you from my perspective that starting from the position that the atheist is just ignorant is a bad idea. In the U.S., where at least nominal belief is the norm (some 90 percent of Americans profess some sort of belief), the non-believer is more often than not someone who came out of a background of belief. One doesn’t just fall away, typically, and then call himself/herself an atheist. Instead, they typically grow critical, then objectively think about the evidence for the existence of a god, or the truth of the NT stories about Jesus, and the history of the church, they look at the so-called believers around them who profess that god is at work in their lives, and so on, and they conclude that it’s all unlikely to be true.

If you want to convince anyone of anything, you really need to start from a position of respect for that person. Be considerate of the fact that, just as you believe atheists lack some kind of knowledge and that that ignorance explains their atheism, your own religious beliefs are subject to exactly the same criticism (believers believe out of their ignorance).

At the end of the day, I find it inconceivable that a true atheist would be convinced by anything short of a true miracle that the individual could not explain away.
 
Atheism, as it is usually defined is a “lack of belief”. It therefore follows that it is also a lack of knowledge. To “know something” in philosophy or to have “knowledge of” an object, in this case God, from an epistemological foundation, is to have a “justified, true, belief.”
It seems to me that atheists who seriously oppose the existence of God and devoutly advance their atheist agenda are not doing so with a “lack of belief” in God (lack of spiritual knowledge and understanding, perhaps). I think that atheists through their own words and by their own actions show that they have a definite belief in their head that God does not exist.
 
So God is not the loving Father who intervenes to create souls, heal the sick, give us the grace to resist temptation,to be present in the Holy Eucharist and other Sacraments, communicate with the saints, inspire poets, artists and musicians, answer our prayers, console the afflicted, prevent accidents and disasters,
What does all this have to do with evolution?
preserve life from extinction and ensure that development occurs in the face of overwhelming odds…
Evolution takes care of that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top