How do I respond to this commonly heard attacks on the old testament?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CHCL
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Studying the bible in a vacuum. If god were truly everywhere on Earth you would never be in a vacuum. It would not be so simple to interpret the OT passages so incorrectly. Killing innocent children would be understandable with or without some one explaining context in fact the truth of it should be self evident.
You massively underestimate free will and that certain things were written on our hearts from the beginning. Despite our darkened intellect from the fall, all men no matter how much sin they commit still enjoy doing good.
 
What exactly would be the timeline you deemed correct? And not for anything it took a few thousand years for the fulfillment of God’s covenant with man to be completed in the Church, He established, the Catholic Church has Apostolic succession which means we have been replacing the office of the Apostles for the past 2,000 years. We have 266 successors from Saint Peter who have been shepherds the people of God in the New Covenant. We even have Peter! His remains are directly under the altar of Saint Peter’s Basilica in Rome. We have seen Daniel 7:17-28 play itself out, guess which church is headquartered in Rome?
I would say god could have started a bit sooner instead of standing by watching from the heavens for 96,000 years of human development, watching as his humans lived and died with very short life spans and nomadically moving around dying from diseases that they could not understand. Then 4000 years ago he decides now is a good time to start. Then 2000 years ago we just hadn’t quite got the messages so he reveals himself in one of the least educated areas. Yes I say there was room for improvement.
 
I would say god could have started a bit sooner instead of standing by watching from the heavens for 96,000 years of human development, watching as his humans lived and died with very short life spans and nomadically moving around dying from diseases that they could not understand. Then 4000 years ago he decides now is a good time to start. Then 2000 years ago we just hadn’t quite got the messages so he reveals himself in one of the least educated areas. Yes I say there was room for improvement.
Your presumption is that this life is better than the one with God after death. I reject that. As far as not getting the message, I reject that as well the people get the message if you understand salvation history. The people of God had to include the gentiles or else a lot of things wouldn’t make sense, the Kingdom of God is for every human being on this earth. Remember “pride commeth before the fall”, thinking you know better than God is why Satan was kicked out of heaven. God shows His might by working through the humble, least educated and the poor. It’s why 12 normal guys who were fishermen and carpenters and who were not part of the extremely learned Levitical priesthood ushered in the earthly Kingdom of God and not the really educated who had distain for the poor and the sick, especially for the spiritually poor and sick sinners and they believed the gentiles defiled them. If you ever visit poverty stricken third world countries, despite the extreme poverty they are generally happier than most American are. Cardinal O’Malley tells a story of when he was on a mission trip and his Capuchin Friars were handing out food to an extremely poor community in the Philippines and there was a young girl around 12 who waited in line for hours and when she got to the distribution table all that was left was a banana, everyone felt terrible however she assured them the banana would be just fine and sincerely thanked them for helping her community. She then proceeded to walk over to three younger children who were sitting under a tree nearby and she split the banana into three portions and licked the inside of the banana peel for herself. She had no formal education and lived in extreme poverty but she understands the Kingdom of God better than most ever will. Blessed are the meek and humble
 
Your presumption is that this life is better than the one with God after death. I reject that. As far as not getting the message, I reject that as well the people get the message if you understand salvation history. The people of God had to include the gentiles or else a lot of things wouldn’t make sense, the Kingdom of God is for every human being on this earth. Remember “pride commeth before the fall”, thinking you know better than God is why Satan was kicked out of heaven. God shows His might by working through the humble, least educated and the poor. It’s why 12 normal guys who were fishermen and carpenters and who were not part of the extremely learned Levitical priesthood ushered in the earthly Kingdom of God and not the really educated who had distain for the poor and the sick, especially for the spiritually poor and sick sinners and they believed the gentiles defiled them. If you ever visit poverty stricken third world countries, despite the extreme poverty they are generally happier than most American are. Cardinal O’Malley tells a story of when he was on a mission trip and his Capuchin Friars were handing out food to an extremely poor community in the Philippines and there was a young girl around 12 who waited in line for hours and when she got to the distribution table all that was left was a banana, everyone felt terrible however she assured them the banana would be just fine and sincerely thanked them for helping her community. She then proceeded to walk over to three younger children who were sitting under a tree nearby and she split the banana into three portions and licked the inside of the banana peel for herself. She had no formal education and lived in extreme poverty but she understands the Kingdom of God better than most ever will. Blessed are the meek and humble
You are mistaken. I never said life was better now. I believe that life right now in the present is.
 
You are mistaken. I never said life was better now. I believe that life right now in the present is.
Did you not state that God just sat around and watched humans live short lives and permitted them to be nomadic and die of diseases? To me that is emphasizing the temporal existence not the transcendent existence of man.
 
Did you not state that God just sat around and watched humans live short lives and permitted them to be nomadic and die of diseases? To me that is emphasizing the temporal existence not the transcendent existence of man.
Well he would have sat and watched for 96,000 years and billions before that. More i would be emphasizing the ridiculousness of the statement of how important the churches 2000 year history is compared to the history of man. Also the story of the girl sharing food is very inspiring and showing the innate attribute of caring for other humans.
 
Well he would have sat and watched for 96,000 years and billions before that. More i would be emphasizing the ridiculousness of the statement of how important the churches 2000 year history is compared to the history of man. Also the story of the girl sharing food is very inspiring and showing the innate attribute of caring for other humans.
2 Peter 3:8 8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.
 
I constantly hear that the old testament is the story of an evil god by agnostics and atheists. I know they are wrong but I am not so knowledgeable about the old testament in general (BTW, I just started reading about the faith more often, but have never gotten an answer) , and don’t want to spread any falsehood.
Greetings in our Lord,

Augustine goes through a number of the Manichaean objections to the Old Testament in , Bk. 22Against Faustus.

For prophetic pronouncements against nations, we can answer this most simply by noting the use of hyperbolic language, and God’s own explanation given in Jeremiah 18:7-10 and elsewhere. These are general answers to general objections. To answer the specific concern of the person raising the objection, we would have to be more exact in our answer.

The following thought from Augustine is helpful when dealing with objections to the violence of the Old Testament and its seeming to be in contradiction with God’s character as revealed in the New Testament:

“If one considers with a believing mind, as one should, deaths of this kind by which souls are sent to hell, he will regard as quite insignificant that slaughter, however great it might be, and those rivers of blood from mortal bodies that were eventually going to die sooner or later. This fellow exaggerates those killings and describes them with rhetorical foolishness in order to blaspheme against God who afflicted with such deaths those for whom such terror was beneficial. He arouses horror in mortal minds and supposes that he is doing something by kicking against the goad. As a result, while he accuses the providence of God for the death of the flesh, he is being sent to hell by the death of the heart. What person of either sex would not prefer to be slain by the sword, even in the way Phinehas the priest slayed the fornicators in the very embrace of their wicked pleasure, when he made them a terrifying example of vengeance against detestable lust? In so doing he greatly pleased God. Who, I say, would not prefer to be killed by that sort of death, who would not prefer to be consumed by fire or to have his private parts torn away by the bites of wild beasts than to be sent into the eternal fire of hell? Why then would the God of the Christians punish sinners with such deaths that, after the passing destruction of the body, there follows punishment without end in hell, unless he is the one God of the two Testaments? After all, the Jews could say in answer to this man’s impiety—no matter how much he exaggerates the wars, the slaughters, the wounds, the deaths, and the blood—that, by far, their God acts with an incomparably greater gentleness than our God, since their God punishes in a far more gentle way by the passing deaths of the body than by the everlasting flames of hell” (Answer to an Enemy of the Law and the Prophets, Bk. 1, 29—in Arianism and Other Heresies, pp. 373-374).

With love in Christ,
Pete
 
2 Peter 3:8 8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.
This makes it no better actually it would aid in the indifference of it all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top