K
Karlw
Guest
If you’re an Anglican or Lutheran (or one of those “liturgical Presbyterians”), how do you feel about the new missal texts?
Well personally I think the problem is the other way around. Protestant churches imitating the post-Vatican II Catholic Church, and losing all of their traditional beauty in the process. But if we continue the imitation, and adopt some of the texts from your splendid new Mass translation, it will be a very welcome step backwards.It is of no concern to me what Protestants think about the Mass. :nope: Too much time has already been given to that, and we are worse off for it.
Just curious, how could a step backwards be welcome(d)??But if we continue the imitation, and adopt some of the texts from your splendid new Mass translation, it will be a very welcome step backwards.![]()
I think Bran means “A step forward, in continuity with the past.”Just curious, how could a step backwards be welcome(d)??
Backwards as in resembling how we used to worship. Protestant never said “and also with you” before Vatican II. We said “and with thy spirit”.Just curious, how could a step backwards be welcome(d)??
I think I see.Backwards as in resembling how we used to worship. Protestant never said “and also with you” before Vatican II. We said “and with thy spirit”.
Yup. All the Protestant liturgical churches jumped on the band-wagon to copy the NO liturgy, and abandoned perfectly beautiful and theologically full liturgies for what I will politely call something less beautiful and theologically full.Well personally I think the problem is the other way around. Protestant churches imitating the post-Vatican II Catholic Church, and losing all of their traditional beauty in the process. But if we continue the imitation, and adopt some of the texts from your splendid new Mass translation, it will be a very welcome step backwards.![]()