M
MartinJordan
Guest
This would mean that the Torah waa never corrupted. Hasantas of course may claim otherwise.Neither has the Torah, from which many teachings found in the Qur’an derive.
MJ
This would mean that the Torah waa never corrupted. Hasantas of course may claim otherwise.Neither has the Torah, from which many teachings found in the Qur’an derive.
I see. And the Church has probably done no in depth research on the religion of Islam.I believe what the church teaches about the Catholic faith to be true.
What the Catholic church teaches about the Islamic faith is flawed, and untrue, because in-depth research on this faith, proves this to be the case.
I see. And the Church has probably done no in depth research on the religion of Islam.I see. And the Church has probably done no in depth research on the religion of Islam.
Maybe you could give the Vatican a call and help them out.
Mark 14:60-64What I don’t get is why he posted multiple Bible passages. Did Hasantas read through the Bible and find those specific verses that he didn’t understand? Or was it a copy/paste thing?
My question remains. Hasantas posted Mark 14:61 but not verse 62. I want to know why, and what point he was making by posting verse 61.
I feel as if Hasantas just copied and pasted without actually knowing what he was talking about.
Be sure Church is aware of everything even such thing that will make you very surprise when you hear.I believe what the church teaches about the Catholic faith to be true.
What the Catholic church teaches about the Islamic faith is flawed, and untrue, because in-depth research on this faith, proves this to be the case.
If they have, it’s not reflected in their statements about it.I see. And the Church has probably done no in depth research on the religion of Islam.
Maybe you could give the Vatican a call and help them out.
Where is the evidence to support your claim?Be sure Church is aware of everything even such thing that will make you very surprise when you hear.
The high priest at Jesus’s trial knew very well what Jesus meant, hence the reason for the death penalty to be applied.Actually ı have answered your question. I have stated that ıf the word of Son would be changed with prophet or messenger of God then the problem is solved. Example “Are you the Christ, the Messenger(Son) of the Blessed One”. And also what does that mean “ Son of man seated at the right hand of the Power”. Who is Son of man?
They may do, but it does not alter the fact that the Islamic god Allah was the “creator” god worshipped by Mohammed, which became the god of Islam.Also Allah as a term was in use by Christians before Mohammad’s lifetime and is in use by millions of them now
Good question. However, since you brought it up and changed its meaning I’m going to test you. What does this mean?:Mark 14:60-64
60 The high priest then rose before the whole assembly and put this question to Jesus, ‘Have you no answer to that? What is this evidence these men are bringing against you?’
61 But he was silent and made no answer at all. The high priest put a second question to him saying, ‘Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?’
62 ‘I am,’ said Jesus, ‘and you will see the Son of man seated at the right hand of the Power and coming with the clouds of heaven.’
63 The high priest tore his robes and said, ‘What need of witnesses have we now?
64 You heard the blasphemy. What is your finding?’ Their verdict was unanimous: he deserved to die.
Sorry dronald! Candidly ı did not understand what you asked but now ı do. Actually ı have answered your question. I have stated that ıf the word of Son would be changed with prophet or messenger of God then the problem is solved. Example “Are you the Christ, the Messenger(Son) of the Blessed One”. And also what does that mean “ Son of man seated at the right hand of the Power”. Who is Son of man?
He’ll get back after some youtube videos.Good question. However, since you brought it up and changed its meaning I’m going to test you
";… he has no love for unbelievers (3:32); and he is the “best of deceivers” (3:54; 8:30).
Ofcourse a Christian would interpret this verse that Jesus emphasize the human nature of Himself. As ı mentioned previously it is said that “Son of God did that or said that” but when a statement come out directly from mouth of Jesus then Jesus does not say ı am Son of God but son of man. I think they forgot to change this statement.Good question. However, since you brought it up and changed its meaning I’m going to test you. What does this mean?:
62 And Jesus said, "I am, and you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven. "
What is Jesus speaking of? Why did He say those exact words?
Because a man, Adam, brought sin into the world, it would take the “Son of Man” to make reparation. That is why the emphasis on “Son of Man”.Ofcourse a Christian would interpret this verse that Jesus emphasize the human nature of Himself. As ı mentioned previously it is said that “Son of God did that or said that” but when a statement come out directly from mouth of Jesus then Jesus does not say ı am Son of God but son of man. I think they forgot to change this statement.
What’s “right hand of power, coming in the clouds of Heaven”. Why did Jesus say exactly that?Ofcourse a Christian would interpret this verse that Jesus emphasize the human nature of Himself. As ı mentioned previously it is said that “Son of God did that or said that” but when a statement come out directly from mouth of Jesus then Jesus does not say ı am Son of God but son of man. I think they forgot to change this statement.
Might not be proper to say. Jesus said"…let not your left hand know what your Right hand does."What’s “right hand of power, coming in the clouds of Heaven”. Why did Jesus say exactly that?
What do you mean?Might not be proper to say. Jesus said"…let not your left hand know what your Right hand does."
The church doesn’t know it’s the left hand that takes care of the sheep and babes.
![]()
Because a man, Adam, brought sin into the world, it would take the “Son of Man” to make reparation. That is why the emphasis on “Son of Man”.