M
MiserereMeiDei
Guest
I’ve heard…but I like to assume better of Catholic nursing homes.
Last edited:
This is so, so sad!! So many sheep ignorant because their shepherds are deliberately looking the other way! Lord, save your people!!I can’t speak for parishioners, but I was talking to my priest a couple of days ago and he told me that the previous archbishop (1970’s to 90’s) had ordered the priests to never speak about contraception and if it came up in confession to either ignore it or say it wasn’t an issue and move on.
I would think that’s because surgery has its own risks. But I agree - it does seem wrong!If you get permanent contraception you confess once and get a “free ride” the rest of your life. If you use temporary contraception you have sin over and over and have to confess each time. Something seems wrong.
We have quite a few churches in the area only offering confessions for 15 or 30 minutes one day a week. It seems rare to find a diocesan church that offers confessions more than that, though we have a few that offer them every day before mass. I’m sure the parishioners can arrange a confession outside that time slot, but that’s a horse of a different color.And I don’t know what you’re talking about with Confessions being less offered and less practiced. I hear confessions every single day.
If you get permanent contraception you confess once and get a “free ride” the rest of your life. If you use temporary contraception you have sin over and over and have to confess each time. Something seems wrong.
(emphasis mine)If you are sterilized, and you repent of having been sterilized, and you confess to it, then you are forgiven. And you are not morally obligated to reverse the sterilization.
If the individual knows that contraception is sinful, and still refuses to go, the individual will be in the situation where their heart will be hardened, leading the door to other grave sins.
- Or just not go? Possibly for several years?
If the individual does not know that contraception is sinful, and has doubt, they must investigate the matter immediately.
If the individual does not know that contraception is sinful, and doesn’t care, that does grave harm to ones soul. Learning about the faith and what the Church teaches is a continuous pursuit.
In all these cases, plus the ones you mentioned, it is unwise to receive the Holy Eucharist
As far as I am aware, the Church has no magisterial teaching on what couples are supposed to do if one or both of them has been deliberately sterilized with contraceptive intent (as opposed to a hysterectomy, removal of the gonads, or surgery that has otherwise rendered them involuntarily sterile). There is no teaching that they must have it surgically reversed. For the woman, it would be invasive surgery within the core of the body to go back in and join the Fallopian tubes back together. For the man, it would not be as invasive, if only the vasa deferentia had to be spliced back together. But in either case it could be too costly, not certain to work, and could have health risks. Each case is different.If you get permanent contraception you confess once and get a “free ride” the rest of your life. If you use temporary contraception you have sin over and over and have to confess each time. Something seems wrong.
I have a very hard time understanding how it is desirable to leave people in good conscience when they shouldn’t be. It sounds like a case of “the tail wagging the dog”, i.e., the penitent being allowed to continue sinning, because otherwise they’ll get discouraged and abandon the sacraments or leave the Church altogether.I am sure that priests are in many cases instructed to not ask questions on private topics like this to the penitents…To not make them move away from confession and the Church.
I would have to defer to a priest on this — @edward_george1, could you help us out here? — but my understanding is that if the contracepting spouse insists upon using an artificial method of birth control themselves (e.g., the wife taking BC pills or the husband wearing a condom), and the non-contracepting spouse does not encourage, condone, or will this in any way, the NC spouse has not sinned. Am I correct?This is a personal anecdote. When I started going to confession on a regular basis about a year ago, the priest I confessed contraception use to told me if I do not want to use contraception to tell my husband I refuse. I didn’t like it, but my husband was imposing it on me. The priest said if my husband wants to do that, he should take responsibility for his own sin. A lot of priests know there’s a spouse pushing the issue, and the spouse who adheres to the Church’s teaching should put their foot down. We are all responsible for our own sins.
What I was speaking of is of some priests who may not ask a penitent. If the penitent accuse himself of this sin, of course the priest would absolve him without deny the sinful nature of the act.I have a very hard time understanding how it is desirable to leave people in good conscience when they shouldn’t be. It sounds like a case of “the tail wagging the dog”, i.e., the penitent being allowed to continue sinning, because otherwise they’ll get discouraged and abandon the sacraments or leave the Church altogether.
Why not? Good idea.I’d like to see “examination of conscience cards”, perhaps laminated flyers, be readily available in pews and confessional
I hear this argument a lot but can’t see it in practice. Most of it’s on the woman - charting, temperatures, etc. And if you’re curious about that “periodic abstinence” part, do a search on those ever-fun “marital duty” threads on CAF.For what it’s worth, NFP requires cooperation and equal sharing of responsibility.