N
NovusAugustus
Guest
Have any of the above Churches begun dialogues with one another? Would any members of the above Churches ever commune with one another? Are relations friendly in cities like Alexandria where there is a Greek Orthodox Patriach/Pope and Coptic Orthodox Patriarch/Pope? Are the two in “competition”?
Also, some of the sources I have read about these communions indicate that the Christological disagreements that motivated the original schisms were not based so much in theology as they were in linguistics and nationalist factors. Would any current members substantiate this belief? In other words, to what degree are these communions rendered incompatible by the fact that the EO accepts Chalcedon, the OO is miaphysite, and the Church(es) of the East are Nestorian?
And finally, do these Churches have any position on the possibility of salvation in the other communions? Is there anything like Extra eclessiam nulla salus in these communions?
I apologize if any of the wording in this post is offensive or wrong–I don’t want to be insensitive.
Also, some of the sources I have read about these communions indicate that the Christological disagreements that motivated the original schisms were not based so much in theology as they were in linguistics and nationalist factors. Would any current members substantiate this belief? In other words, to what degree are these communions rendered incompatible by the fact that the EO accepts Chalcedon, the OO is miaphysite, and the Church(es) of the East are Nestorian?
And finally, do these Churches have any position on the possibility of salvation in the other communions? Is there anything like Extra eclessiam nulla salus in these communions?
I apologize if any of the wording in this post is offensive or wrong–I don’t want to be insensitive.