G
Gorgias
Guest
Google “Aristotle on time” or “Aquinas on time”. They’re their arguments, not mine. “We stand on the shoulders of giants”, remember?And where is your argument?
Google “Aristotle on time” or “Aquinas on time”. They’re their arguments, not mine. “We stand on the shoulders of giants”, remember?And where is your argument?
But the only way we measure time is via the motion of something. It’s a comparison of how much things change position relative to each other. We compare the motion of a quartz crystal to the motion of whatever it is we are observing for instance. We accept one as a standard, but the standard is simply the change in position of something compared to something else, and we compare things to that agreed upon rate.They are separable. You could have a variable, like position, and a change in the variable. Speed is
the ration of change over time elapsed. Therefore time is needed as a separable variable for calculation of speed.
How is length an entity?OTOH, I think time actually is an entity, a dimension like length and width.
I have no idea what the bold faced means. Are you copying the description of particles in quantum theory?Consider a change in a system, S->S’. These states should be in different point related to a variable otherwise state of affair is ill-defined. You however need a duration between two points otherwise change does not take place. This variable is therefore time.
We of course experience duration of events. It is called psychological time. From googling: " time perception refers to the subjective experience of the passage of time , or the perceived duration of events, which can differ significantly between different individuals and/or in different circumstances."My sense is that time is perceived rather than felt. I have never felt time but I perceive it in such a way that I experience events as happening in serial, one thing after the other, but that’s not necessarily how things really are. It’s just what we perceive.
All the best
No, I perceive change.So you haven’t in your entire life perceived change?
Yes, that is true. That is how we measure time. But time as an entity exist. We can think of fabric of space-time. It curves and oscillate, gravitational wave. http://space.mit.edu/LIGO/more.htmlBut the only way we measure time is via the motion of something. It’s a comparison of how much things change position relative to each other. We compare the motion of a quartz crystal to the motion of whatever it is we are observing for instance. We accept one as a standard, but the standard is simply the change in position of something compared to something else, and we compare things to that agreed upon rate.
I mean that a system cannot be in S and S’ states at the same point. State of system is ill-defined in this case.I have no idea what the bold faced means. Are you copying the description of particles in quantum theory?
“Change” suggests that there is a duration between S and S’. This duration is called time; it is a variable for measuring or describing the change. It is descriptive, not a separate entity. Like length.
So what do you mean when you say time is an entity? Your example says it is a description, not that it is an entity?
We can think of time in any way we like, but we cannot separate it from motion. Time is a human name for a concept not an entity. Space-time is not the same as time on its own. Time does not exist on its own.We can think of fabric of space-time. It curves and oscillate, gravitational wave. http://space.mit.edu/LIGO/more.html
Conceptually, yes, in reality no. We can’t even conceive of no motion in any meaningful way because everything is always changing position relative to everything else. Our thoughts are the result of motion. The Universe is always in motion, time, in and of itself cannot exist without motion. Time describes motion.We can have time but no motion.