How do we know which books were inspired by the Holy Spirit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wilkerl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

wilkerl

Guest
40.png
wilkerl:
Hello, I joined this evening as I needed a question answered. I’m teaching a 7-8th grade CCD Class and thought this would be a good way to get help. I didn’t realize that this was a forum at first and thought it was an “authority” from Catholic Answers. However, I like the idea of a forum as most certainly there is an authority out there somewhere.

The question from my student was this. “How did we know which books were inspired by the Holy Spirit?” That’s always a difficult one to answer as the obvious is always that we must have faith in Jesus Christ, when he said, “Thou art Peter and upon this rock…”

Any suggestions will be most appreciated.

wilkerl
 
I’ve been doing research ever since my posting and have found the Apologetics Toolkit at www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/a/canon.html I had googled Development of the Biblical Canon; the Lateran Council and Council of Trent: Rules on Prohibited Books. Fascinating to read.

As usual the Catholic Church is so careful and deliberate to keep everything the way Jesus would want it to be. The Church had to deal with so many heresies after Jesus’ death until the 1500s as well. It has come through it all pristine as I would have guessed. The Holy Spirit guided every thought, of course.
 
Because the Church tells us so!, says St. Augustine, “For my part, I should not believe the gospel except as moved by the authority of the Catholic Church.”
 
Because the Church tells us so!, says St. Augustine, “For my part, I should not believe the gospel except as moved by the authority of the Catholic Church.”
But in “On Christian Doctrine” didn’t Augustine set forth a tiered approach for deciding what books to accept into the canon? And isn’t that the same thing as deciding which books were inspired by the HS? I can’t remember now the exact wording Augustine used, but I think it was (1) books accepted by everyone, then (2) books accepted by the majority, then (3) books accepted by a lot of people. Something like that. It was a hierarchy.

Then, very thankfully, he listed all the books that he himself accepted. That might be an acceptible answer to the students – “Here’s a list of books that have been accepted in the Church since at least the early 400s. Give me one reason to reject any one of them.”
 
40.png
wilkerl:
Catholics believe the books in their Bible are inspired because they were handed on by Christ’s apostles to the Church to be read in the liturgy as Sacred Scripture.

There have been times throughout Church history when the inspiration of certain books has come into question. At these times, the Magisterium of the Church (guided by the Holy Spirit) would come together and make a decision about the canon of Scripture. The Major Church Pronouncements on the Bible can be found here:
catholicapologetics.org/ap031100.htm

You should point out to your students the example set in Acts 15 when the Apostolic Church, guided by the Holy Spirit, settled the first major controversy in the Church. The same method the Apostles used then is still used today and was used to settle the canonicity of Scripture. The Holy Spirit revealed the inspiration of the books of the Bible through the direction of the Magisterium of the Church–the bishops in union with the bishop of Rome.

You might find this online book helpful:
Where We Got the Bible: Our Debt to the Catholic Church
by The Right Rev. HENRY G. GRAHAM,
catholicapologetics.info/apologetics/protestantism/wbible.htm

(This book is available in print as well.)

Many of the Council documents cited above (Council of Carthage, Florence, and Trent) are available online if you want to see the lists of which books the Church accepted.

Also, you can read the articles about the NT and OT canon in the Catholic Encyclopedia:
newadvent.org/cathen/03267a.htm
newadvent.org/cathen/03274a.htm
 
But in “On Christian Doctrine” didn’t Augustine set forth a tiered approach for deciding what books to accept into the canon? And isn’t that the same thing as deciding which books were inspired by the HS? I can’t remember now the exact wording Augustine used, but I think it was (1) books accepted by everyone, then (2) books accepted by the majority, then (3) books accepted by a lot of people. Something like that. It was a hierarchy.

Then, very thankfully, he listed all the books that he himself accepted. That might be an acceptible answer to the students – “Here’s a list of books that have been accepted in the Church since at least the early 400s. Give me one reason to reject any one of them.”
The problem with this explanation is that Catholics don’t accept which books are inspired based on the authority of Augustine’s list. They accept them because of the decision of the Church Magisterium guided by the Holy Spirit.

For example, during Augustine’s time, there was controversy over the deuterocanonical books (Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Baruch, Sirach, and I & II Maccabees.) Augustine thought these 7 books should be considered canonical; Jerome thought they shouldn’t. In the late 4th and early 5th century, the Church convoked the local African Councils of Hippo and Carthage to decide (among other things) which books were canonical or acceptable to read in Church. The documents from the Council of Carthage AD 419 were sent to the Bishop of Rome (Pope Boniface I) for approval, and he approved them. You can read these Council documents online, and Canon 24 addresses the issue of the canon of Scripture:
newadvent.org/fathers/3816.htm
Canon 24. (Greek xxvii.)
That nothing be read in church besides the Canonical Scripture
Item, that besides the Canonical Scriptures nothing be read in church under the name of divine Scripture.
But the Canonical Scriptures are as follows:
Genesis.
Exodus.
Leviticus.
Numbers.
Deuteronomy.
Joshua the Son of Nun.
The Judges.
Ruth.
The Kings, iv. books.
The Chronicles, ij. books.
Job.
The Psalter.
The Five books of Solomon.
The Twelve Books of the Prophets.
Isaiah.
Jeremiah.
Ezechiel.
Daniel.
Tobit.
Judith.
Esther.
Ezra, ij. books.
Macchabees, ij. books.
The New Testament.
The Gospels, iv. books.
The Acts of the Apostles, j. book.
The Epistles of Paul, xiv.
The Epistles of Peter, the Apostle, ij.
The Epistles of John the Apostle, iij.
The Epistles of James the Apostle, j.
The Epistle of Jude the Apostle, j.
The Revelation of John, j. book.
Let this be sent to our brother and fellow bishop, Boniface, and to the other bishops of those parts, that they may confirm this canon, for these are the things which we have received from our fathers to be read in church.
 
Hi wilkerl,

The Church accepted those books of the New Testament which had been handed down to her as of apostolic origin. In other words, the supreme criterium of inspiration is apostolic origin, what the apostles taught as being from Jesus. Likewise the Old Testament is considered inspired because the apostles told us so, after being taught by Jesus.

Verbum
 
But in “On Christian Doctrine” didn’t Augustine set forth a tiered approach for deciding what books to accept into the canon? And isn’t that the same thing as deciding which books were inspired by the HS? I can’t remember now the exact wording Augustine used, but I think it was (1) books accepted by everyone, then (2) books accepted by the majority, then (3) books accepted by a lot of people. Something like that. It was a hierarchy.

Then, very thankfully, he listed all the books that he himself accepted. That might be an acceptible answer to the students – “Here’s a list of books that have been accepted in the Church since at least the early 400s. Give me one reason to reject any one of them.”
I think perhaps you are thinking of the early church which had books catagorized in three catagories.
  1. Accepted books i.e., the gospels
  2. Rejected books i.e., the gnostic gospels
  3. Disputed books ie., Revelation, Hebrews, 2, 3 John, 2 Peter, James
What is interesting is who did God allow to recognize and choose which books were inspired and which ones were not? The Catholic Magisterium is the answer…
home.inreach.com/bstanley/canon.htm
 
Thank you so much, everyone who answered my question and Joe Monahan for directing me to this thread. I’ve been away for a few days having given up on anyone responding and then out of curiosity, I came back. I think you’ve given me a year’s worth of study and research to keep me busy for awhile. So I’ve got a lot to do to get ready for the class. My husband and I are working on it together.

Truth is, there is no easy pat answer to anything in the 2,000 year old history of the Catholic Church, it appears. I think it was easier just worrying about getting to mass on Sundays and Holy Days, confession once a year, and not breaking the ten commandments. Now we have to be knowledgeable about apologetics; know the Bible’s prophecies and covenants; and walk the walk daily. Life has become 3-dimensional living the faith. It’s exciting really. Thank you again.
 
Catholics believe the books in their Bible are inspired because they were handed on by Christ’s apostles to the Church to be read in the liturgy as Sacred Scripture.

There have been times throughout Church history when the inspiration of certain books has come into question. At these times, the Magisterium of the Church (guided by the Holy Spirit) would come together and make a decision about the canon of Scripture. The Major Church Pronouncements on the Bible can be found here:
catholicapologetics.org/ap031100.htm

You should point out to your students the example set in Acts 15 when the Apostolic Church, guided by the Holy Spirit, settled the first major controversy in the Church. The same method the Apostles used then is still used today and was used to settle the canonicity of Scripture. The Holy Spirit revealed the inspiration of the books of the Bible through the direction of the Magisterium of the Church–the bishops in union with the bishop of Rome.

You might find this online book helpful:
Where We Got the Bible: Our Debt to the Catholic Church
by The Right Rev. HENRY G. GRAHAM,
catholicapologetics.info/apologetics/protestantism/wbible.htm

(This book is available in print as well.)

Many of the Council documents cited above (Council of Carthage, Florence, and Trent) are available online if you want to see the lists of which books the Church accepted.

Also, you can read the articles about the NT and OT canon in the Catholic Encyclopedia:
newadvent.org/cathen/03267a.htm
newadvent.org/cathen/03274a.htm
 
40.png
wilkerl:
Thank you so much, Janet S. This is the best book on the subject of where we got the Bible than anything I’ve ever read.

I’ll be busy reading for quite sometime.
wilkerl
 
Thank you so much, everyone who answered my question and Joe Monahan for directing me to this thread. I’ve been away for a few days having given up on anyone responding and then out of curiosity, I came back. I think you’ve given me a year’s worth of study and research to keep me busy for awhile. So I’ve got a lot to do to get ready for the class. My husband and I are working on it together.

Truth is, there is no easy pat answer to anything in the 2,000 year old history of the Catholic Church, it appears. I think it was easier just worrying about getting to mass on Sundays and Holy Days, confession once a year, and not breaking the ten commandments. Now we have to be knowledgeable about apologetics; know the Bible’s prophecies and covenants; and walk the walk daily. Life has become 3-dimensional living the faith. It’s exciting really. Thank you again.
I know you asked about which books are deemed ‘inspired’ and how that came to be, which is a pretty straightforward answer, the Magisterium. I think your question is really more about ‘canonicity,’ since guidance by the Holy Spirit is a fairly succinct answer and you probably knew that.

So, I really recommend getting or borrowing a copy of The New Jerome Biblical Commentary and in the introductory sections, before actually getting into the Biblical commentaries, there’s an excellent section on the idea of ‘canonicity’ and how that was arrived at, historical thinking, and contemporary thinking on that. It’s a little heavy for kids of course, so you’d want to read it yourself and digest it for them and build a lesson or two around it. Hope this helps.

The answers are are clear, and not really in dispute when one possesses all available information. It’s not chickenbones or lots how the Canon was codified.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top