L
lil_flower_luv
Guest
To the OP: Never underestimate the power of prayer:thumbsup:
Can you please show me where we can find his homily in English?I appreciate your thinking and analysis of the situation. It is so Catholic - the kind of thinking to which I have always been exposed. Sure there were a couple of priests who have said things that have made me roll my eyes (nothing dramatic - just little things) but in the main the priests have been intelligent, highly educated, holy and dedicated men. I even know one from before he became a priest, then attended his ordination and then later when he left the priesthood to marry, employed him. He remains an honest and good person - exceptionally so.
When the abuse scandal was exposed the pain I felt was so intense and my first reaction was to defend (because of my experience…) Then I became angry and wanted to physically attack priests who might have abused. I KNOW that if I had been abused I would have been destroyed…and yet I had two incidences as a child when one man tried to fondle me while piggy-backing me - I wiggled away and ran - and another who exposed himself and I also ran - he was so handsome and I had idolised him but from that day I never went hear him. I have always been bold and cheeky and if a priest had done such a thing I would probably have shouted and screamed and told the world out loud but I realise some people would be too ashamed and timid. Now I want everything EXPOSED and a complete purge. I realise that the scandal will be with the Church for a long time and that perceptions will be extremely negative.
I would like a thread with people who have suffered abuse and how they handled it and how they came through it, if at all, and whether they are still Catholics.
I do firmly believe that there was a time when society believed that pedophiles could be counselled and cured. The realisation that pedophilia is incurable is recent.
I would also like to see the media more honest in their reporting. I saw the entire homily by Fr Cantelamessa and he said that he received a letter from a Jewish friend who went on to say that the persecution of the Church by the media was akin to anti-semitism. CNN reported (and the BBC) that Fr Cantelamessa had said that which is different from it coming from a Jew - in fact Fr Cantelamessa said that he got permission from the Jewish friend to speak about his letter. See the difference? Yet the media reports that it was Fr Cantelamessa’s opinion. It is a dishonest twist and it makes me wonder how many other twisted reports do we hear daily thinking that it is the truth. The media has a tremendously important role but when they rush to be the first to report without checking their facts then they really do us a disservice because they are reporting lies.
God bless you all
Cinette*
I found a translation and Fr. C said before the conclusions reached by his Jewish friend that in affect the Jews know of what they speak, so it does appear that Fr. C was using his friends letter not as a point to be pondered, but as a conclusion to be held.Can you please show me where we can find his homily in English?
Thanks,
Peace
I’m the father of 3 children, all sleeping while they wait for that rodent to show up in the middle of the night. I went to my garage downstairs and when I got back I must have scared him because he left a trail of potty and his tutu along with some books and video games. Next year I’m going to pull out my Remington 12 guage pump shotgun and hope for a new car.Do you now have children?
Cinette![]()
with 25 years experience that began in law enforcement and progressed too through criminal investigations, civil investigations and professional research, I have had the misfortune of being in the back room during off record bargaining and to experience the public embellishment of SOME lawyers to promote the sympathetic favoritism toward their clients in the pursuit of success in their settlement of cases. This at times has gone to a point of mixed truth and false accusations. I have also many times been the direct contact with some media representatives who outright acknowledged their need to attract ratings through maintaining the interest and repeated return reviewers through making the occasional story “more interesting”.I appreciate your thinking and analysis of the situation. It is so Catholic - the kind of thinking to which I have always been exposed. Sure there were a couple of priests who have said things that have made me roll my eyes (nothing dramatic - just little things) but in the main the priests have been intelligent, highly educated, holy and dedicated men. I even know one from before he became a priest, then attended his ordination and then later when he left the priesthood to marry, employed him. He remains an honest and good person - exceptionally so.
When the abuse scandal was exposed the pain I felt was so intense and my first reaction was to defend (because of my experience…) Then I became angry and wanted to physically attack priests who might have abused. I KNOW that if I had been abused I would have been destroyed…and yet I had two incidences as a child when one man tried to fondle me while piggy-backing me - I wiggled away and ran - and another who exposed himself and I also ran - he was so handsome and I had idolised him but from that day I never went hear him. I have always been bold and cheeky and if a priest had done such a thing I would probably have shouted and screamed and told the world out loud but I realise some people would be too ashamed and timid. Now I want everything EXPOSED and a complete purge. I realise that the scandal will be with the Church for a long time and that perceptions will be extremely negative.
I would like a thread with people who have suffered abuse and how they handled it and how they came through it, if at all, and whether they are still Catholics.
*I do firmly believe that there was a time when society believed that pedophiles could be counselled and cured. The realisation that pedophilia is incurable is recent. *
I would also like to see the media more honest in their reporting. I saw the entire homily by Fr Cantelamessa and he said that he received a letter from a Jewish friend who went on to say that the persecution of the Church by the media was akin to anti-semitism. CNN reported (and the BBC) that Fr Cantelamessa had said that which is different from it coming from a Jew - in fact Fr Cantelamessa said that he got permission from the Jewish friend to speak about his letter. See the difference? Yet the media reports that it was Fr Cantelamessa’s opinion. It is a dishonest twist and it makes me wonder how many other twisted reports do we hear daily thinking that it is the truth. The media has a tremendously important role but when they rush to be the first to report without checking their facts then they really do us a disservice because they are reporting lies.
God bless you all
Cinette![]()
It was a homily not a thesis. The purpose of a sermon is to reflect on how the Gospel applies in our daily lives. Fr.C raised this as an issue for consideration.I found a translation and Fr. C said before the conclusions reached by his Jewish friend that in affect the Jews know of what they speak, so it does appear that Fr. C was using his friends letter not as a point to be pondered, but as a conclusion to be held.
Agreed. Except that the secular media misquoted him as if they were simply his own thoughts. For example, the BBC News headline was: “Outrage at anti-Semitism comparison by Pope preacher”. As others have noted, this was inaccurate and misleading reporting. Fr C has since apologized for any misunderstanding or offence that occurred. Have any of the secular media done the same?So there is really no issue with characterizing it as something Fr. C said, since he actually did say it, and he made notice that he gave some authority to what he was to read. It would have been better to give some attribution as well.
Yes, the press, during the rise of the Third Reich, largely turned a blind eye to what they were doing. At the same time, the Nazis undertook a major propaganda campaign to increase the circulation of their 'news’papers through increasing the coverage given to scandals involving Jewish people. For example, they accused a Jewish-owned clothes company of failing to pay income taxes and investing money in Switzerland. This story dominated the Nazi press for several weeks. These scandals were hyped up by the Nazi press in order to increase prejudice against Jewish people, laying the groundwork for persecution. It is this parallell that seems to have struck Fr. C’s friend, when he wrote:The ironic thing about that is that the German people pretended that they didn’t notice the strange smell from the ovens or the mass graves or the slave laborers. In the case of the Nazi’s the press was silent, in the case of abuse, the press is not silent, so the anti-semitism claims of Fr. C and his friend are probably misplaced.
The use of stereotypes and the passing from personal responsibility and guilt to a collective guilt remind me of the more shameful aspects of anti-Semitism
Something the “Catholic Church” has been guilty of for centuries…The shameful aspects of anti-Semitism<<----------:tsktsk:
“The use of stereotypes and the passing from personal responsibility and guilt to a collective guilt remind me of the more shameful aspects of anti-Semitism”
:ballspin:The shameful aspects of anti-Semitism<<----------:tsktsk:
PM me your email address and I will gladly forward you Fr Cantalamessa’s homily.Can you please show me where we can find his homily in English?
Thanks,
Peace
The press has propagated the lies about Pius XII for years. Fortunately there are Jews who have written books to expose the truth of Pius XII role in saving the lives of hundreds of thousands of Jews.I found a translation and Fr. C said before the conclusions reached by his Jewish friend that in affect the Jews know of what they speak, so it does appear that Fr. C was using his friends letter not as a point to be pondered, but as a conclusion to be held.
So there is really no issue with characterizing it as something Fr. C said, since he actually did say it, and he made notice that he gave some authority to what he was to read. It would have been better to give some attribution as well.
But it doesn’t distort the fact that fr. c was trying to emphasize that the church was being prosecuted in the media. The ironic thing about that is that the German people pretended that they didn’t notice the strange smell from the ovens or the mass graves or the slave laborers. In the case of the Nazi’s the press was silent, in the case of abuse, the press is not silent, so the anti-semitism claims of Fr. C and his friend are probably misplaced.
Peace
Here is the latest on Fr Cantalamessa:Father Cantalamessa Clarifies His Reference to JewsPM me your email address and I will gladly forward you Fr Cantalamessa’s homily.
Happy Easter - Jesus is risen - ALLELUIA!
Cinette![]()
Here’s a little question for everyone.Having said this I do not put the blame on the Church of God/Christ but on the people who profess to be HIS followers.THE CHURCH,has mutated into an institution,more concernd with keeping up apearences,than keeping it’s self accountable to the “institution” Christ intalled.
Here’s a little question for everyone.
I am not saying that decisions taken were right. I myself would have preferred that they were removed from office and de-frocked.You’re right. I would be reluctant to throw the family garbage out in the street for all to see. I would take great pains to foster an environment of healing. Like the Bishops 50 years ago my judgement might have bent to the secular wind and I might have thought a little therapy would purge my son of that unnatural desire. But for the life of me if he pleaded to return to the field that gave that desire opportunity for satisfaction I would not believe he had repented. If he pleaded with me to never let him go near again to those he might endanger, to not let him be exposed to near occassions of this sin, I would rejoice for his contrite heart and for not having to force him to do what ought to be done.
A spin has to be put on the analogy, what was happening was a web of disorder that spun all the way up to the Shephards of souls. Pedophilia wasn’t the disorder that caused this scandal. Same sex attraction caused this scandal. That desire found rich soil to plant roots and had become a tall tree in the garden of our Priests. The gardener isn’t focused on weeding out candidates to the Priesthood who suffer with a disordered sexual desire for children. Same sex attraction is the gardeners target.
The analogy would require that the father be afflicted with the sickness of the son. Perhaps having more or less control over it. Nevertheless, the analogy would require that the sin of the son be clouding the judgement of the father. That the father be not just reluctant to go to the police but be fearfull that the spotlight on his son might cast his own disfigured shadow on the neighborhood street.
It got that bad.
We are all part of the one Body of Christ. When the toe is blistering and infected the whole Body is in pain.I don’t hold the entire church responsible, just the 1-4% of priests who abused and all the bishops and cardinals and popes, except those that did all they could to not condone abuse with inaction.