Well, for starters, we need to agree on the definition of the word “genocide”.
I know that it’s boring to have to agree on a definition.
But, we are talking about a serious accusation here.
Would you want to appear in court to defend yourself, but not be able to get anyone to tell you PRECISELY what the charges against you were?
There was an author named Kafka who’s name actually represents cases such as that in which the defendant or prisoner never actually learns what the charges against him are.
For example, genocide involves large scale killing. Therefore, accusers must be able to catalog the specific events involved.
It is pretty ordinary for people to accuse the Catholic Church of non-specific crimes, but without specificity. That is part of the persecution that the Church has had to endure.
When I have asked people to provide specifics, they usually do two things: 1) they accuse me of being stupid because I didn’t KNOW what they were referring to; and, 2) they accuse me of being “divisive” [their word] and confrontational.
In other words, it is ok to be accused of heinous crimes, but not ok to ask for the details. The Catholic Church is supposed to stand there and accept guilt for unspecified crimes.
Sometimes, also, folks say that the accusation of “genocide” is already specific and that they don’t need to provide details.